Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I know the term "frankenwatch" is used as a bad term to describe changing watch parts with others to maybe fool a future buyer.

It usually is a bad thing, right?

On the other hand, if I change the bezel, it's called "modding" 🤨

In my particular case, I'll be using a standard Seiko 6309, beautiful case, sporty with a classy, very comfy stock bracelet. Everything original.

Now, I have a spare 6349 movement that works pretty well. By exchanging the movements, I'll turn the watch into something unique, but, in the eyes of many, also a frankenwatch.

To be fair, I'll upgrade a stock watch into something, theorically, better.

People do this all the time in cars, for example, why is this a problem for some when it comes to watches?

Posted

On a personal note it's something I would avoid at all cost but I only see this as a real problem when someone is trying to pass something off that it isn't.

I presume you don't have the original 6309 to repair as a lot of the parts are interchangeable with the 6349.

 

Posted

Many will want in your case a genuine Seiko. If you go about doing what you want that is entirely up to you, but Seiko collectors will only go for the rear genuine ones from Seiko catalogues. 

Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, BFernandes said:

People do this all the time in cars, for example, why is this a problem for some when it comes to watches?

Not people who collect classic cars. My boss collects, among other models, Chevy Corvettes. The wrong set of wheels or tailpipe on an otherwise original $250,000.00 car can make it worth less than half that to a collector. Tires, brakes, belts, etc. are all considered replaceable. 

Same with your Seiko. You can replace the gaskets, crystal* and mainspring without issue, but a barrel or balance could raise an eyebrow while the entire movement would clearly be a cardinal sin.

If your intention is to have a better functioning timepiece, the go for it. If you want a collectible, the change as little as possible. It would probably be worth more in a non-running condition with original parts than if it was running with a better movement. 

The "why" part I'll leave to philosophers and sages.  

 

 

* as long as the crystal is NOS from Seiko.

Edited by eccentric59
Posted
3 hours ago, BFernandes said:

I know the term "frankenwatch" is used as a bad term to describe changing watch parts with others to maybe fool a future buyer.

It usually is a bad thing, right?

On the other hand, if I change the bezel, it's called "modding" 🤨

In my particular case, I'll be using a standard Seiko 6309, beautiful case, sporty with a classy, very comfy stock bracelet. Everything original.

Now, I have a spare 6349 movement that works pretty well. By exchanging the movements, I'll turn the watch into something unique, but, in the eyes of many, also a frankenwatch.

To be fair, I'll upgrade a stock watch into something, theorically, better.

People do this all the time in cars, for example, why is this a problem for some when it comes to watches?

You are comparing unique to original, there are collectors that enjoy both ends of the scale but generally a collector wants to have something exactly as it was made at the factory. I prefer originality and everyone is different, its what makes you happy that counts, i dont buy into what makes other folk happy.

Posted (edited)

There's debate about what a frankenwatch is- I've seen professionals call certain factory original Rolex watches Frankens because they have unique Rolex movements (I'd have to go look up which ref they are). Mods are mods, but if you swap out for a different  movement and like it, congrats Dr. Frankenstein...

...I have no issue with Seiko frankens. Original parts are such crap or crap expensive its the only way to keep some of these classics alive. My first and possibly last foray in to Seiko taught me the expensive way...

The nieces and nephews and their SOs in my family will all be receiving a rehajm restored vintage watch for their birth day this year. the first goes out in a couple weeks, which is a Seiko Full Franken...

IMG_1951.thumb.jpeg.ea4b74e38d393e1276fc9662c1fe10ee.jpeg

The nephew is a large fellow what enjoys a a few pints so this is perfect- indestructible and not a huge loss if it isn't. He will be recieving an education on what a Frankenwatch is and instructions to speak with uncle rehajm if he needs liquidity and wants to sell...

Edited by rehajm
  • Like 2
Posted

Franken? To me. Not.

My personal thought on a Franken watch, of which I have quite few, due to my lack of purchase price. 

Parts missing, wrong parts, broken parts, wrong screws, incorrect backs, wrong crown. All these I have. I'm working my way through them with replacement donors. If, when I get them running, they will have been Franken, but will then be part of my collection of 'watches'.

Different views for different people.

  • Like 3

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I’ve been playing with a NH35 movement that which has the classic Etachron regulation system and a few balance assemblies as practice. What I’m trying to do is get comfortable with the effect both the stud and regulator pin positions have on rate and positional error. When I install a new balance assembly I install it with the assembly in place  on the cock and cock is attached to base plate. I use the back of the tweezers to push the stud into place and feel the click. However, I noticed that the angle of the stud can be adjusted and what I also noticed is that some movements have the stud carrier arm bent down a little and that changes the angle of the hairspring leaving the stud. This angle effects how the spring goes through the regulator pins and also the spacing of the coils opposite the stud. What I thought I was supposed to do is set the regulator block in the middle of the curve, open the pins, and use the stud angle to center the spring.  Then the stud is set.  Now on all the new NH movements I have seen the angle of the regulator block is about 60 degrees counter clockwise from full open. I watched a video where the author used the regulator pin adjust to adjust rate and position error. When I close down the pins I do notice that the rate increases but also the amplitude drops, the coil spacing changes and hairspring appears slight straighter between the stud and the regulator block. If I open the pins the amplitude comes back, the spring breathes a bit more between the stud and the regulator block and the rate slows.  So, a long post I know but I would really appreciate any advice on how to correctly adjust the etachron system for rate, amplitude and positional error.   
    • Aw come on Andy, it was just a comparison between spending 30 quid and tackling a tricky piece of work. You appeared to be volunteering,  i volunteer for stuff all the time it gets me into all kinds of trouble.
    • It's not really shown here , but the blade flips over, so it faces the other way. The knob and threaded case holder then pushes the caseback seam into the blade. Once the blade starts to penetrate into it, the lever and blade are lifted , which should hopefully pop the back off. A lot of fashion style cases have very tight seams and need a sharp blade to start separating them.  Don't buy the cheaper plastic versions of this tool, the posts with the pins through for blade holder break easily if the apply extra force to blade. 
    • You will still be looking for a balance complete I’m afraid, this is the balance staff, balance wheel and hairspring in one package. Hairspring and the balance wheel are matched in the factory. Whilst we can change a balance staff the hairspring and balance wheel stay together.   Tom
    • The hairspring end has come adrift from the small terminal barrel.  I have tried to remove the taper pin to relocate it, but the task is beyond my skill set, eyes, hands and being in my 70s, probably beyond my life expectancy.  It is not too badly mangled on the end.  On the ebay offer, that really is a bit on the rich side.  I'll keep looking, maybe a good hairspring will turn up with a shot balance staff. As for time spent on knees.  I made up one of these from 3M magnetic tape and a piece of wood.  It works well for magnetic parts. Other things I have suffered with.  I found lubricants so very expensive that I bought some very small syringes and tiny needles.  I just decant a drop into my oiling pots when I start a movement and the remainder keeps really well in the syringes. Finally identifying the correct screw for the part led me to make up the board in the final pic.   Thanks for the info. Kind regards   Chris  
×
×
  • Create New...