Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

As you can hopefully see from the photo, I have removed two cracked jewels from their settings and have preserved a nice sleeve of brass to rub in new ones. The problem I have is that, as is common with cracked jewels, both jewels disintegrated when I pushed them out. I have already worked out the pivot holes from a belt and braces pivot measurement and jewel hole measurement using jewel gauges, before I removed them. The problem I have now is I don't want to start jamming a vernier calliper in the hole to check the jewel size and risk damaging that nice brass lip on each setting and then not be able to rub the jewels back in.  I was thinking of using a pusher to check from the underside and then take the next one up (and so on) from the topside until I find the right fit but was wondering if there is a safer method of measuring or if anyone had any other suggestions, maybe measuring the underside and then adding a tenth or two?

IMG_2849.jpeg

Edited by ScrewDropper
Posted
1 hour ago, AndyGSi said:

What's the movement and what pivots are they as there are some lists showing jewel details for certain movements.

This is one of those English pocket watches from around 1890-1910. Utilising, from what I can tell, from some geneic parts and hand made. Virtually nothing matches from one movement to another . You get a lot of them on eBay and non have a listed manufacturer. I’m deliberately pushing myself by working with something where I can’t just get parts and have to rebuild anything that is broken but cheap enough that I can ford to fail. I’ve already (nearly, just need to hone the pivots) made a new balance shaft and remade a 3rd wheel staff from another that was too long. It’s a long but enjoyable process 

1 hour ago, eccentric59 said:

If it were me, I'd (gently) slide a smoothing broach into the hole and measure the point where it where it stops. That should get you close.

I can get the hole measurement easily enough by using a pusher from my jeweling set but using it to measure the bed risks damaging the brass lip that I need to rub the new jewel in. There’s some rules of thumb around things like pivot holes being the pivot diameter plus .02mm and I was wondering if there was a similar rule of thrum for the jewel bed

Posted

The rule is that the jewel must get in the bed without resistance and (almost) without free play. So using the pushers is correct idea. Just find the one that will get in as described and see it's size. Be aware that modern levels intended for press fit are not good for rubbing in. They can be used, but after reshaping the outer part like in the old stones

  • Like 1
Posted
1 hour ago, nevenbekriev said:

The rule is that the jewel must get in the bed without resistance and (almost) without free play. So using the pushers is correct idea. Just find the one that will get in as described and see it's size. Be aware that modern levels intended for press fit are not good for rubbing in. They can be used, but after reshaping the outer part like in the old stones

This is good advice, thanks. I’m hoping to get hold of some older NoS jewels but I may have to deal with modern(ish) press fit but I’m not familiar with the process of reshaping. Do you have a link to further information?

Posted

Sorry for the delay,

I can say what i do. I turn on the lathe flat the face of a brass rod with a little bit larger or same diameter as the stone.Then glue the stone on the face with shellac and center it while turning the spindle. Then I use diamond file or disk grit 800-1000 by hand to reshape the stone as it turns. Reshape - I mean rounding ор beveling at least on the side where  rubbing will be. Shaping the other side will change the height position of the stone. Reducing the diameter is possible, but not to much as hand filing on lathe sometimes makes things excentric

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Similar Content

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I’ve been playing with a NH35 movement that which has the classic Etachron regulation system and a few balance assemblies as practice. What I’m trying to do is get comfortable with the effect both the stud and regulator pin positions have on rate and positional error. When I install a new balance assembly I install it with the assembly in place  on the cock and cock is attached to base plate. I use the back of the tweezers to push the stud into place and feel the click. However, I noticed that the angle of the stud can be adjusted and what I also noticed is that some movements have the stud carrier arm bent down a little and that changes the angle of the hairspring leaving the stud. This angle effects how the spring goes through the regulator pins and also the spacing of the coils opposite the stud. What I thought I was supposed to do is set the regulator block in the middle of the curve, open the pins, and use the stud angle to center the spring.  Then the stud is set.  Now on all the new NH movements I have seen the angle of the regulator block is about 60 degrees counter clockwise from full open. I watched a video where the author used the regulator pin adjust to adjust rate and position error. When I close down the pins I do notice that the rate increases but also the amplitude drops, the coil spacing changes and hairspring appears slight straighter between the stud and the regulator block. If I open the pins the amplitude comes back, the spring breathes a bit more between the stud and the regulator block and the rate slows.  So, a long post I know but I would really appreciate any advice on how to correctly adjust the etachron system for rate, amplitude and positional error.   
    • Aw come on Andy, it was just a comparison between spending 30 quid and tackling a tricky piece of work. You appeared to be volunteering,  i volunteer for stuff all the time it gets me into all kinds of trouble.
    • It's not really shown here , but the blade flips over, so it faces the other way. The knob and threaded case holder then pushes the caseback seam into the blade. Once the blade starts to penetrate into it, the lever and blade are lifted , which should hopefully pop the back off. A lot of fashion style cases have very tight seams and need a sharp blade to start separating them.  Don't buy the cheaper plastic versions of this tool, the posts with the pins through for blade holder break easily if the apply extra force to blade. 
    • You will still be looking for a balance complete I’m afraid, this is the balance staff, balance wheel and hairspring in one package. Hairspring and the balance wheel are matched in the factory. Whilst we can change a balance staff the hairspring and balance wheel stay together.   Tom
    • The hairspring end has come adrift from the small terminal barrel.  I have tried to remove the taper pin to relocate it, but the task is beyond my skill set, eyes, hands and being in my 70s, probably beyond my life expectancy.  It is not too badly mangled on the end.  On the ebay offer, that really is a bit on the rich side.  I'll keep looking, maybe a good hairspring will turn up with a shot balance staff. As for time spent on knees.  I made up one of these from 3M magnetic tape and a piece of wood.  It works well for magnetic parts. Other things I have suffered with.  I found lubricants so very expensive that I bought some very small syringes and tiny needles.  I just decant a drop into my oiling pots when I start a movement and the remainder keeps really well in the syringes. Finally identifying the correct screw for the part led me to make up the board in the final pic.   Thanks for the info. Kind regards   Chris  
×
×
  • Create New...