Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I am a retired panel beater, who spent most of my life stripping down and repairing various things for friends and family.  Family name - Mr. Fixit !

I took up watch repairs a couple of years ago and thoroughly enjoyed it, usually buying old broken watches and stripping them down to gain some experience.

My brother in law recently asked me to have a look at his  Rolex Oysterdate 1959 model, as it was losing time when he wore it. I put it on my timegrapher and it was all over the place.

When I put the watch on its side, with the winder upwards it actually stopped working. I removed the balance wheel and had a look through my microscope at the jewel on the main plate, I discovered the balance wheel lower pivot had cut a grove to the left side of the jewel and had gone right through to the other side, I would think this took a good number of years to happen.

Any ideas if this is repairable or would I require a new main plate?

Kind regards Tancho.

IMG_1646.jpeg

IMG_1645.jpeg

Posted (edited)

 The chaton is replaceable and this one MUST BE REPLACED with a new one, cuz the groove in which shock spring locks is ruined, therefor might lets capstone  sit unlevel in the setting thus pushes balance pivot to rub on Chaton's hole.

Check balance pivot under high magnification for wear,  where it rubbed on chaton hole, as well as the pivot's cone .

Good luck.

 

Edited by Nucejoe
Typo
  • Like 1
Posted

Hi,

Thank you for your replies,

The chaton, staff jewel, and shock spring were all in place, and don’t appear to be damaged.
The staff seems to have worn a grove to the side of the the chaton, I don’t know how it could have happened.

IMG_1648.jpeg

Posted
3 minutes ago, RichardHarris123 said:

The chaton doesn't seem to be damaged but the staff has worn a hole in it?  I'm confused. 

I read this as: the chaton is fine, but a groove has been worn into the pivot hole beneath the chaton, in the metal part of the upper block

  • Like 1
Posted

The pivots look ok. The hole is in the main plate only it hasn’t reached the chaton it is just about to come through the main plate. I don’t know how this was possible you would think it would be easier for the shank to go through the hole and into the jewel. 

Posted
On 9/9/2024 at 11:19 PM, Tancho said:

The staff seems to have worn a grove to the side of the the chaton, I don’t know how it could have happened.

Pivot should go through the jewels hole without rubbing on anything. In your watch pivot has rubbed on the side of the hole in chaton housing, which point to, 

1- Loose shock spring, which lets  balance jewel move about loosely inside the chaton housing.

2- Cap stone sitting unlevel which pushes the pivot to the side and rub on chaton housing  hole.

 Rubbing pivots eat amplitude ,  ruins itself & other stuff it rubs on, it must be replaced with a new one.

There might be cheap chatons of other calibs that  interchange. 

 

 

 

 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Agreed, this is puzzling. Can you ask questions or inspect the lots before bidding? My Boley & Leinen Reform face plate is dia. 95mm exactly. It's possible that 4 inches is a slightly too large approximation, but why then make the distinction to 3 11/16 for the sake of 8mm? If the larger ones are truly 4" then they will clash with the bed, but then I have no idea which 8mm lathe would take them. All 8mm lathes have spindle height 50mm or less, as far as I know. The spindle height is, as you say, standard 50mm for W.W.
    • I have only been a member for six years & I have found this a very friendly forum although I don’t have anything to do with watches not because I don’t like watches but because I have gout in both hands so my dexterity isn’t very good, I restore torsion clocks & occasionally other antique clocks also at 72 my eyes are not what they used to be, that is why I only post on the clock forum & the lathe forum mostly . As others have said Mark it is much appreciated that  you are willing & able to do this. very many Thanks Dell
    • Ah, this is brilliant, thank you very much!
    • A local machinery auction this week is liquidating some watchmaker's equipment. Actually a truly absurd amount of it, from a machine collector's estate, making me wish I had waited a couple of months to buy my lathe because there are so many options at low prices. Anyway - there are a handful of faceplates on 8mm collet mounts up for sale and I think I can probably get one. Having never had one in hand, they seem kind of large as described though - all are listed at either 4in (101mm) or 3 11/16in (93.7mm) diameter. As I understand it, WW lathes are 50mm from spindle center to bed so it seems like the 4 inch faceplates would not have enough clearance. Could I expect the 3 11/16in to fit with a WW headstock and bed? What is a typical diameter for a faceplate? Also possible the description of "4 inches" is only a rough estimate by the auction house and not actually accurate. Example the 3 11/16": I may have answered part of this - a lot of the listings on ebay from typical American lathe tool makers are specify about 3.75 inch diameters. Still I don't see any that specify 4 inches, but I am still guessing that is an overestimate by the auction broker.
    • Buying a specific jewel for a specific movement is difficult if not impossible in most cases. cousinsuk/jewels
×
×
  • Create New...