Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
On 10/4/2024 at 4:32 PM, Nucejoe said:

George Daniels is right, I thought him that. 🤣 lol 

On serious side, he is my favourite legend, Ok must  confes ,like bereguet too. 

Did George say third of  (diameter or of barrel bottom surface area? ).

 

1/3 of the barrel bottom. The internal diameter of the barrel.

Posted

Seems even native English speaking guys are confused by the …banking issue 😀.

Berner‘s lexicon says:

IMG_4892.thumb.jpeg.c05afc229d9b0ccae7c8c3a079dcf2c6.jpeg

Rebanking he calls „knocking“ which avoids all confusion and was already proposed by Klassiker.

I found only one big fault in Daniels‘ book and that is the claim of 1/3 barrel diameter for the correct mainspring. This is wrong. The arbor uses 1/3, the remaining 2/3 make a free area in which a correct mainspring takes 1/2 (area). Of course then the relaxed mainspring will use less then 1/3 diameter, the wound mainspring more than 1/3.

Frank

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted
10 minutes ago, praezis said:

Seems even native English speaking guys are confused by the …banking issue 😀.

Berner‘s lexicon says:

IMG_4892.thumb.jpeg.c05afc229d9b0ccae7c8c3a079dcf2c6.jpeg

Rebanking he calls „knocking“ which avoids all confusion and was already proposed by Klassiker.

I found only one big fault in Daniels‘ book and that is the claim of 1/3 barrel diameter for the correct mainspring. This is wrong. The arbor uses 1/3, the remaining 2/3 make a free area in which a correct mainspring takes 1/2 (area). Of course then the relaxed mainspring will use less then 1/3 diameter, the wound mainspring more than 1/3.

Frank

I see the diagram visually represents both a rebanking and overbanking situation with the directional pull of the hairspring unidentified .

  • Like 1
  • Sad 1
Posted
Just now, praezis said:

That is true. You have to read the text and the picture should be a video 😀

Great explanation Frank, i wonder do other areas of the world use the 2 terms interchangeably,  Kalle used what we would consider the incorrect term.

Posted (edited)
3 minutes ago, Neverenoughwatches said:

i wonder do other areas of the world use the 2 terms interchangeably

I would suspect geography less than just repeating whatever term mentors used. I did see something somewhere blaming "Americans" (e.g. me) for mixing up the two. There are plenty of things you can blame us for besides that.

Edited by mbwatch
  • Like 1
Posted
1 minute ago, mbwatch said:

I would suspect geography less than just repeating whatever term mentors used. I did see something somewhere blaming "Americans" (e.g. me) for mixing up the two. There are plenty of things you can blame us for besides 

 

Screenshot_20241007-174806_Google.jpg

  • Haha 1
Posted (edited)
On 10/4/2024 at 4:38 PM, nevenbekriev said:

See, The idea to take balance out to check and look at is wrong. Actually, You need the balance and the pallet fork IN the movement to do the checks needed.  It is better to put ONLY the balance and the pallet fork (with their cocks) on the main plate. Then You need to turn the balance in some direction and try to force the pallet fork to the other side. You should try this in different manners, like balance up - fork down and vise versa. Then You should repeat the same when balance is turned to the other direction. Generally, the fork must NOT be able to go to the other side. This should be the same as to lock a drawer so fast that to throw the key inside before it is fully closed. And, if the fork is able to go to the other side, then investigate how, when and why this happens. Generally, it happens if the guard pin is short and passes thru the roller or it passes above or under the roller. Or, the roller doesn't rotate true and there is certain balance position where the roller gets far enough from the pin and lets it pass. The other reason for rebanking is that the impulse jewel is short or it stays up and in certain situation can pass above the fork's horns

So I checked it following the method you outlined and the pallet fork held (ie everything was fine).

so I swapped out the mainspring with one I picked up on eBay from a salvage movement. In fact it is the whole barrel assembly and I decided just to use it as is (I didn’t want to risk opening the barrel up just to measure the spring).
The amplitude is much lower, 250-260 (vs +300 plus before). I’m going to run the movement in multiple positions over a couple of days at full wind to see if this solves the problem.  
 

thanks to all for helping out.

Edited by Levine98
Posted
On 10/4/2024 at 10:44 PM, nevenbekriev said:

If we talk about the situation when the watch has stopped with the impulse jewel outside the fork notch in zero position and it is needed to take the balance out and put it back correctly for making the watch work again, then it has nothing to do with the mainspring. The strong mainspring may be provoking the fault more frequently, but if it is able to happen, then it will happen again and again, until the real reason is rectified. And, the real reason is that the guard mechanism of the balance, which consists of the guard roller and the guard pin, for some reason and in some situation, doesn't work.

I am lazy to write it again, so just quoted myself

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, nevenbekriev said:

I am lazy to write it again, so just quoted myself

I get your point, but in order to find the root cause I need to be able to replicate the issue. So if a slightly weaker mainspring masks the issue, not sure what else I can do at this point? I checked end shake and tested with just the pallet fork and balance complete in place but couldn’t replicate.  If you think there are other things to check please advise. Or maybe it will fail later today but as of now, 2 hours in, under multiple positions, it’s running fine.

thanks again, Jay
 

Edited by Levine98
Posted

Hi Jay,

Actually, it is like a cat which is in a cage. If the cat has once found a way out of the cage, then the cage for sure is not in order. The reverse is not always true: if the cat is still in the cage, then it doesn't mean the cage is in order. May be the cat is lazy, not smart enough or not hungry...

As You cat has proven to be able to get out of the cage, then no point to doubt if it will get out again.

The overbanking may not happen when the watch works on the table. But, start to use it as a watch - put it on the wrist, then forget about it and do You normal activities. Shaking and sudden position changes will provoke overbanking, and if it is able to happen, then it, sooner or later, will happen again.

  • Like 3
  • Thanks 1
Posted
1 hour ago, nevenbekriev said:

Hi Jay,

Actually, it is like a cat which is in a cage. If the cat has once found a way out of the cage, then the cage for sure is not in order. The reverse is not always true: if the cat is still in the cage, then it doesn't mean the cage is in order. May be the cat is lazy, not smart enough or not hungry...

As You cat has proven to be able to get out of the cage, then no point to doubt if it will get out again.

The overbanking may not happen when the watch works on the table. But, start to use it as a watch - put it on the wrist, then forget about it and do You normal activities. Shaking and sudden position changes will provoke overbanking, and if it is able to happen, then it, sooner or later, will happen again.

Nevenbekriev, I fully take your point, thanks again. It was locking up (overbanking) even just on the bench before. I’ll bounce it about after re-casing to see if I can provoke it 

  • 2 months later...
Posted
On 10/12/2024 at 2:33 PM, Levine98 said:

Nevenbekriev, I fully take your point, thanks again. It was locking up (overbanking) even just on the bench before. I’ll bounce it about after re-casing to see if I can provoke it 

Well I’ve been struggling with this movement for some time. It was still locking up today after firing it up for the first time in a couple of weeks. Decided to check the end shake of the pallet fork and it did seem a tad to much, which seemed to me a reasonable possibility. So I adjusted a smidgen (actually two smidgens at first, but that was too tight, so backed off a smidgen), and am testing now. Will re-case tomorrow and wear for couple of days to see if i have finally licked this devil. If not, thinking might be time for me to sell as salvage.  

  • Like 1
  • 2 weeks later...
Posted
On 10/7/2024 at 6:44 PM, praezis said:

Not surprising to me 😎

I can't help but admire his confidence though! 😆

On 10/7/2024 at 7:03 PM, Neverenoughwatches said:

I didn't need Tarantino to come to my own conclusions about the healthiest food on the planet 😅

Speaking of healthy food, we all know a varied diet is the best. That’s why I like to alternate between McDonald's, Burger King, and Wendy's.

  • Haha 2

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • If at all possible, find a service guide for the automatic movements your work on, because the lubrication procedures may have different requirements or rely on oils you would not use in a manual wind train (in addition to the braking grease you mentioned). Some autos like older Seikos do not have a manual wind option, so the procedure of letting down the mainspring without being able to use the crown may require a screwdriver in the ratchet wheel screw and great care. Do you have an auto movement you were planning to start with?
    • I am an amateur, so there's that. I do not get fixated on amplitude, lift angles, and beat error. However, 4.8ms would bug me if it were my watch. But you must judge your own skills to appreciate the possibility of going backward. I suggest, that you button it up let your friend enjoy the watch for now. As your skills progress, come back to it and correct it. I assume that this watch has a fixed hairspring pin. Some modern watches have an adjustable pin along with adjustable regulator. These are trivial to get in beat. I own a valjoux 726 my dad gave me on my 18th birthday (a looooong time ago). I broke the ratchet wheel with an aggressive wind 4 yrs ago. I have been waiting for my skills to progress before doing a service. I am close. Your advice is well placed and I will apply it.
    • I didn’t find any anomaly to the left of the red mark…reflection? this is the balance in its pivot in the inverted assembly. i can’t see any obvious kinks  and the spring is flat as far as I can see. Either the stud screw is missing, or it’s glued in… I don’t know. I’m loathe to fiddle with it. Any further insights? Thanks!
    • Update!  I've dismantled it, cleaned all the glue off, and rebuilt and lubricated the base movement. I'll leave the chrono part for another day. It's running well - great amplitude and keeping time, but it's got a beat error of 4.8ms.    How important is it to correct this? I'm worried that the potential for making things worse having to take the hairspring off and on repeatedly to adjust this. Would anyone here accept it at that?
    • Since I've been banned from the previous discussion, apparently my language was inappropriate...for small boys. I will start another thread and act in a more decent manner for the girls and ladies of the group.  Please what will happen if the forum can't be managed by the administrator, are there provisions in place to preserve the achived member's questions and answers over the years. Please if I may ask these important questions that are important to the members please.
×
×
  • Create New...