Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

As "factory" faceplates are ridiculously expensive these days, I decided to make one myself. I have the plate on the watchmakers lathe now and there's no runout, so now it's time to make some clamps. My question is this: I have seen several designs. They all have a seperate setting screw between top and bottom part to tilt the upper part. They differ however on the way the upper and lower parts are clamped. Some have a seperate screw for fixing the bottom part and another for tightening the upper part. Others have 1 single screw for tightening both the upper and lower part in one go. Are there any pro's and cons you guys are aware of?

 

20241206_151117.jpg

20241206_180809.jpg

20241221_145948.jpg

20241222_112732.jpg

20241223_162331.jpg

Edited by caseback
  • Like 3
Posted (edited)

Have you looked at the machining involved with the clamps? Have you looked at enough to see there's a general theme? These old guys weren't dumb. That the flat part where the part registers is within fractions of a hundredth of a mm in height? The plate is (relatively) simple, if you have a lathe that can face straight over 100mm. But the clamps? Yeah 3d print them and kind of do ok work and wonder what all the fuss was when folks made stuff out of metal. But Hardinge and Levin and Derbyshire and Lorch and Boley and Boley Leinen and a dozen more knew what they were doing, and even at current Ebay prices are worth every penny.

 

If you want to machine the clamps out of (any) metal, obviously time is of no essence, and so you can do them correctly, using granité plates to verify their trueness, even hand scraping to get them true.

My advice, if you want to actually use a faceplate, is find a Hardinge or Levin and buy it and start faceplating. If you just want to make one then knock yourself out.

Edited by nickelsilver
  • Like 2
Posted
1 hour ago, nickelsilver said:

Have you looked at the machining involved with the clamps?

Thnx for the warning, but yes I have.

I don't "need" a faceplate at the moment, but earlier I already had a project where it would have been nice to actually have one. So this seems like a nice project. This is strictly a hobby for me and I like (love!) making and fixing stuff and bringing home stray machines that I can fix/improve. My wife eventually stopped asking me what I will be using any "new" bit of machinery for, because the usual answer is "I don't know yet. Probably making more tools" 😉

The clamps will probably be machined from ground flat stock to skip some steps, but I could use coarser stock as well as I have the tools needed to do the grinding myself (surface grinder, granite plate)🙃.

What clamp type does you faceplate have (1 or 2 screws?). Have you used the other type as well? Do you have any preferences?

  • Like 3
Posted (edited)
9 hours ago, caseback said:

What clamp type does you faceplate have (1 or 2 screws?). Have you used the other type as well? Do you have any preferences?

All the clamps I have used have been a variation of some sort of this one in the photo (two clamps there, one assembled one apart). The jack screw is to allow the clamp to contact the part parallel, which increases the clamping area and also reduces the chance of dinging the part. 

 

I do do quite a lot of faceplate work, and many years ago figured out that I prefer the setup in the third pic. The part is glued to a brass support (second pic), which is centered on the plate optically and held with simple clamps. I can glue and unglue newly made and delicately finished parts with no damage, and also handy for small or odd parts (I think that's a LeCoultre 409 mainplate on the support).

 

 

20241224_134205.jpg

 

 

20241224_135108.jpg

IMG_0036.JPG

Edited by nickelsilver
  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
Posted
2 hours ago, nickelsilver said:

All the clamps I have used have been a variation of some sort of this one in the photo (two clamps there, one assembled one apart). The jack screw is to allow the clamp to contact the part parallel, which increases the clamping area and also reduces the chance of dinging the part. 

 

I do do quite a lot of faceplate work, and many years ago figured out that I prefer the setup in the third pic. The part is glued to a brass support (second pic), which is centered on the plate optically and held with simple clamps. I can glue and unglue newly made and delicately finished parts with no damage, and also handy for small or odd parts (I think that's a LeCoultre 409 mainplate on the support).

 

 

20241224_134205.jpg

 

 

20241224_135108.jpg

IMG_0036.JPG

Is there an advantage with this set-up compared to just a big brass wax chuck ?

Posted
3 minutes ago, Neverenoughwatches said:

Is there an advantage with this set-up compared to just a big brass wax chuck ?

Well, it's essentially a big-ass (haha) wax chuck. The advantage is being able to glue parts on conveniently; I use super glue (Loctite 480), then the brass block goes in acetone and a few minutes later the part is off and clean. Since I knock around the block to get it true on the faceplate the part is never at risk.

 

I used to do a perpetual calendar where every hole for a jewel in every bridge got "uprighted" in the faceplate. 11 on the movement side, about that many on the dial side. Mainplate I would screw down to a similar brass block that was purpose-made (I did a lot of these); I could do all the holes in a couple of hours.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 2
Posted
30 minutes ago, nickelsilver said:

Well, it's essentially a big-ass (haha) wax chuck.

I imagine the grid-pattern on these help with both hardening and softening the glue. Did you put it there yourself (if so: how?) or is it a ready bought product?

Posted (edited)
2 hours ago, caseback said:

I imagine the grid-pattern on these help with both hardening and softening the glue. Did you put it there yourself (if so: how?) or is it a ready bought product?

Yes to both, and most importantly the part glues super flat. The grooves are done with a checkering file, and the top of the block gets a skim cut on the faceplate so the surface is really parallel to the bottom. Part sits on the block, drop of glue on a piece of brass or whatever, then I pick up and feed some in with an oiler here and there around the part. It wicks in to the grooves, which also provide "tooth" for holding.

 

For something with a decent amount of surface area, putting glue on that surface then the part onto a smooth holder can result in significant out-of-flat (hydraulics).

Edited by nickelsilver
  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
  • 3 weeks later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Web sites are cheap. Message board are easy. Hosting both is less than 100 usd a year and small advertising would cover most of that.  In the discord group we did some 15 min poc and threw up a couple of different message boards on a domain i host.   The real value is the data / information / hive mind While I'm a rank amateur in watch repair the information and assistance on this board is invaluable. The members on here are friendly, entertaining and a wealth of knowledge This is what needs to be preserved  --Jeff
    • The post below contains the link. If you don't already have a discord account it will take you to the registration screen.  Registration is free.   https://www.watchrepairtalk.com/topic/31653-mark/?do=findComment&comment=279066
    • HWGIKE#57 Valex FEF 190 15 jewels Swiss lever full service and repair This one was waiting for a balance staff replacement in my cabinet parts and case cleaned up with a new balance staff and a 4th wheel as the original 4th wheel had a broken pivot for the off center second hand. I never attempted a balance staff replacement before however I received a Bergeon Molfres (i was hunting it for about 2 years) and with the help of it I managed to remove the old staff and riveted the new one in. It also received a new MS, crystal and the hole for the MS arbor was also tightened. With the new MS now it has an acceptable performance meaning that the amplitude goes up to 280 fully wound, has an acceptable beat error and I have the two nice lines but only dial up, dial down is not as nice and I could not figure out as why. I have the two lines but the amplitude is dropping to around 230 and the lines are a bit hairy. Both dial up and dial down the lines just go up and down without seemingly any pattern. I cleaned the movement two times, and then a 3rd time pegged out the main plate and train bridge holes but made no change. Both the HS collet and the roller table was too lose on the new staff... I did not count how many times I took the balance cock off to sort out the HS collet, the roller table and the beat error, somebody before me also shortened the HS by pushing it out a bit and it seems every time somebody is messing with the end of the HS the protruding bit is most of the time twisted bent etc. This one was probably one of the most challenging repair and service. I might take the new MS out and clean it lubricate it as I just pushed the new one in to the barrel from the retaining ring. Plus started to re-read the theory of the escapement and how to analyse the graph on the timing machine: Greiner Chronografic Record manual. I am also thinking to put the watch on a 24 hour long run with the eTimer SW it once helped me to figure out what was wrong with a watch. There is an interesting part of the Greiner record manual talking about the pallets and the end shake of the balance and pallet staff. Maybe this is my issue? Who could that possibly identify? After a few years now I am still without a clue how could watchmakers make parts I can only see with my microscope or how could/can they carry out complicated services impossible to do.. real magic..... .... ..... before I sent this post while the pics were uploading I had an idea, i was browsing the possible outcomes on the timing machine I had one for magnetism..... so I demagnetized the movement and it is not hairy now.... two really nice lines 0.2 ms beat error still a bit wavy, but a lot lot better..... argh....  
    • Hi there, welcome here.  
    • yes the advertising revenue should generate money. The question is how much money? Then as far as the cost of the website goes that's relatively easy to determine? all you would have to do to grasp costs and profitability would be to go to the link below and you can actually get a website for free try it out for free I believe you get no advertising initially. They also talk about that they'll help you out they have marketing tools and some sort of paid subscription or something. So I guess were shopping for a whatever just ask them what would a maybe could use this one as an example in other words it's going to look basically identical to this is going to have advertising a paid subscriptions what's it going to cost? After all they want to sell or give us a message board like this they should bill answer the questions as they're the people who did the software for this. Yes they really said you can have a free discussion group at least to start. https://invisioncommunity.com/ I was curious about the monthly supporter thing where exactly do we find that on this message board? A quick search I'm not finding it so obviously I'm not looking in the right place?
×
×
  • Create New...