Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Hi all. Please be gentle I'm an old boy and this is my first post.
I am looking for some help with an Omega (1332 movement late 70's - early 80's) I Purchased last year via ebay.
As soon as I removed the case back I met with the common problem of  battery leakage, although it doesn't appear too bad.  Having tested the electric module in-situ apart from the coil everything testable appears dead. So first I needed a replacement module. But, if you know the 1332, you will have already guessed I can't find a module anywhere.
The actual circuit board looks salvageable so I'd hoped I could find and solder new replacement components and refurb the old module. A simple enough job I thought. 
The coil has continuity so that can stay - 
I have not a clue where I'd source a replacement IC (integrated circuit) which I call the CHIP (I am told these were produced by Fujitsu). Any ideas about sourcing the right Chip would be good, otherwise that will have to stay in place. The component giving the biggest grief is the little black in-line cylinder shape(please see the photos where an arrow shows this component positioned in 3 or 4 Omega module of that era). I did ask three Omega repairers what it was. One said - a capacitor, one said - a resistor and the last  said - a condenser. My question is, can anyone shed any light on what this in-line component actually is and what strength/rating would that obscure component have. Many thanks - Look forward to your replies.

Om1322.JPG

Om1337.jpg

Om1340.jpg

Om1342.jpg

Posted

Thanks Richard - It might be helpful to know that the IC has the following code -

Top Line MB13

Bot Line 0101Y

Cheers

Posted

Hi AndyGSi - Yes I've got a multimeter. I used it to test when the module was inside the movement and I also purchased and used a quartz watch tester using the sensor pad. Thanks for your interest BobH.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Hi Mike I did a ships clock a long while ago, not a Hermle though and without getting the beast in my hands to refresh my memory I can’t recall the timing.  This doesn’t help I know but will start the grey matter turning.
    • Of course it will continue Richard.
    • I have stripped and cleaned a Hermle ships clock. It was just oily, no major faults, and I reassembled it, following my photos in reverse order. The time train is fine but the strike train will not play the ships bell strike for half-past. Ships bells play a four hour sequence for the 'watches' and play double 'ding' for the hour and the double dings plus one for the half past (eg half past the second hour is 'ding-ding' 'ding-ding' 'ding'). Sounds complicated but it isn't really. The strike wheel consists of pairs of bumps (for the ding-ding) and no single bumps. There must me some mechanism on the half-past that lifts the strike lever over one of the bumps so only one ding is played. When I get to a half past, it still plays double ding. I have a feeling it is to do with the lever in front of the rack (there is a sprung attachment  on it) and the position of the wheel (to the right) with the two pins that lets that lever fall, but no matter where I place that wheel I cannot get a single ding at half past! Please can someone help with advice on positioning so I can fix this? BTW Happy Easter 🐣 
    • No it's not 52. I had looked at the Pocket Watch lift angles thread, which lists Elgin 6s as something really high like 62° but visually that is not at all what this watch is doing. I think 42° is more correct and that's where my machine is setup. The watch has a million problems but I have made solid progress. Impulse jewel replaced. Hairspring didn't match the balance (which also doesn't match the serial) but I got it down into range this weekend with 8 or 10 huge timing washers. Replaced the mainspring, balance and train are nice and free. At this point it is running consistently and in beat at about 160°, the third wheel has a bend that sends the timegrapher on a little roller coaster every 8 minutes or so. Remaining amplitude problems may be down to the escapement. The banking pins were way out and it didn't run at all before I started. It has one of the old brass escape wheels rather than steel, and I assume the faces its teeth are probably worn or scored in a way I can't yet fix (or see without a microscope). I know this watch is not going to run above 250° but I am going to keep trying to get above 200. But the best part about this watch? Some unscrupulous person stamped "21 JEWELS" on the train bridge sometime in the past, right on top of the Damascening. It's a 15 jewel movement.
    • I think it would rather be the blast of high current drain that would do the damage. But if used occasionally to maybe fix a mainspring or do dial feet it might be worth trying especially if the mainspring or a replacement couldn’t be found.    Tom
×
×
  • Create New...