Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

The roller with impulse jewel sits a little loose on the new balance staff, even if I ordered a staff for exact same calibre. Can I do anything about it? 

IMG_20250114_211658088.jpg

Posted (edited)
48 minutes ago, Khan said:

The roller with impulse jewel sits a little loose on the new balance staff, even if I ordered a staff for exact same calibre. Can I do anything about it? 

35 minutes ago, Khan said:

I hope so.

I ordered this one. My calibre is a Pierce 103 without incabloc. 

https://www.ebay.com/itm/192680125499

Screenshot_20250114-213201.png

 

Do you have .43mm for the roller ?

Edited by Neverenoughwatches
Posted (edited)

I use this tool to measure, might not be the most precise. What tool should I measure with by the way? 

But it says 0,40 for the new staff and 0,405-0,410 for the old when I measure the thickness of the staff where the roller should be fitted. 

I see now the arbor is also too slim to fit in the balance wheel hole. So its totally wrong and useless. 

IMG_20250114_222431000.jpg

Edited by Khan
Posted (edited)

0.1mm per division is far too inaccurate for watchmaking. You'd at least need a 0,01 accuracy. A feintaster would be nice, but they are often very expensive. A thickness gauge (analogue or digital) with a 0,01 accuracy is a low cost alternative.

You could use a screw type micrometer as well, but care should be taken not to damage your part.

Screenshot_20250114_225720_Amazon Shopping.jpg

Edited by caseback
  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted

So from what you've said it would appear you haven't got a pierce 103 so photos of the movement may help confirm this.

You need to be using at least a pair of digital calipers to get some sort of accuracy.

  • Like 2
Posted

You can use some thread locker to fix the roller table in place, if this is the main problem.

How the balance fits on the seat? It is clearly seen that the old staff is just punched out, and that the rivet on it is spread a lot. Now expected that the hole is too large and will wobble on the seat. 

  • Sad 2
Posted
6 hours ago, Khan said:

Thats the movement. Pierce 103, it has this extra wheel on top so not a basic 103. It looks to also be called 103cld

IMG_20250105_203113002_HDR.jpg

Thats just the drive wheel for the sweep pinion

The caliber is also listed as a moon phase triple calendar 

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

Yeah my bad that I used staking tool to punch out the old staff. I dont have a platax tool unfortunately. 

Yes, its a moonphase calender watch. 

I see its better to replace the whole balance. Do you guys think this one will fit on page 12? 

https://www.ebay.com/itm/275331810162

My picture attached is my balance wheel from before. 

IMG_20250105_203556307.jpg

Edited by Khan
Posted

Punching out the staff always has that chance of deforming the hole, widening the hole. Using a Platax is just a safer way of punching out the staff, from what I understand of the tool it's more to do with not bending the balance arms, the hole is still at the same risk. Punching a tight fitting riveted piece of steel through a non steel hole....surely has consequences...maybe not first time but subsequent multiple times. 

  • Like 3
  • 2 weeks later...
Posted (edited)

It works with the new nos balance! 

I though had to turn the hairspring in position to fit the bridge. The beat error is very high (roller jewel a bit off from the centre of balance "wings" but amplitude fine. How important is it to align the roller table? If so, I guess I have to diassemble the hairspring before taking off the roller table and personally dont want to mess too much with it. 

IMG_20250124_233652582_HDR.jpg

IMG_20250124_233547723.jpg

IMG_20250124_215922634.jpg

Edited by Khan
Posted

Do you know how to adjust the beat error on a watch like this? It doesn't involve touching the roller, only turning the hairspring collet. See this excellent video (but don't worry about the first bit where he gets the impulse jewel in roughly the right position as yours is already there; just do the adjustment he shows in the second part of the video after putting the spring back in place):

BTW, you're not trying to do all this with the watch in its case, are you?

  • Like 2
Posted (edited)

Yes I already did kind of what he does in end of the video. I first placed the balance (without the bridge of course) so it was aligned with the pallet fork. Then marked on the balance where the stud should be and then turned the hairspring.  My impulse jewel is just not exactly perpendicular to the wings of the balance, is that okay like that? 

Edited by Khan

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...