Jump to content

Seiko 7005n loosing lots of time + problem with hairspring terminal curve


Recommended Posts

Hi,

Patient - Seiko 7005n after motorcycle crash, overall in pretty good condition internally but not running.

After closer inspection it turned out roller jewel was missing.

PXL_20250112_155258337.thumb.jpg.897c9cb7fd443fdcd9d81e75b38d0d20.jpg

After searching it turned out new balance complete is cheaper than roller table - so to make work faster and avoid posing problems, ordered part 0310020.

PXL_20250129_1636037112.thumb.jpg.ec56f629036c5df1dded6562c3d3dcf0.jpg

After installing it turned out that terminal curve is way off, see 

PXL_20250131_1825026142.thumb.jpg.93dd50449651e078ec65dde72476fa06.jpg

My own conclusions (pretty obvious):

 - overall spring shape looks okay except for terminal curve

 - terminal curve looks ok near regulator pins (at position when taking a photo) but gets worse and worse closer to the stud

 

Timegrapher results show that watch is loosing lots of time

PXL_20250131_184118603.thumb.jpg.ff24fbf3a3f45e79abd88d06d94ce17e.jpg

 

So I guess there are 2 questions:

 - where exactly should I slightly bend hairspring to fix terminal curve shape? Near stud?

 - does this kind of terminal curve shape could cause that this timing problems or do I need to look into more places?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

the best way to do this would be to remove the balance wheel from the bridge. Then you Both balance wheels side-by-side and figure out where the bands need to be so that they both match each other.

Then the next probably have is they look nice outside of the watch but how do they look in the watch? Often times people centering hairsprings out of the watch do not realize the hairspring has to be flat and it can't be touching the balance itself or the bridge. This is a maximum loss of amplitude when the hairspring is not flat and it's rubbing on things. Only seen when the balance wheel and bridge or in the watch.

then you do have the right part number but did it come in the original brand-new package? I'm wondering because the shape of the balance wheels a little bit different and the material it's made up of is definitely different

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, JohnR725 said:

then you do have the right part number but did it come in the original brand-new package? I'm wondering because the shape of the balance wheels a little bit different and the material it's made up of is definitely different

Int came in packaging which looks proper but no way for me to really verify that 🙂

PXL_20250129_1635032382.thumb.jpg.470431f92e3f0143087fd28593867d98.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, AndyGSi said:

Have you tried rotating the stud?

Unfortunately that's not possible. Stud has v-shaped cut so once screw is tightened it self positions itself to that cut

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If and when the balance is mounted on the main plate and everything is flat and parallel and the only issue is a deformed terminal curve, you could adjust that in situ.. But the hairspring seems to be rubbing against something.

So the tried, tested and thorough method is to take the balance wheel and hairspring off the cock and check if the hairspring is flat and parallel to the wheel. After checking that, remove de hairspring from the balance wheel, correct any obvious bends (and out of flat issues), and mount it on the balance cock so you can check if the hairspring stays properly centered while going through the terminal curve and adjust if needed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

See, the truth is that it is easy to shape the terminal curve as needed, bu it will not help to make watch go faster. You best option now is to use the roller table from the new balance and put it on the old one.

There is small possibility that I am wrong, so you better try first to shape the curve.

The end 'Z' that ends with the stud mus be opened as shown with green. The sprint will get out of center. Then the angle pointed with red mus be opened a little as to the spring to get centered again

PXL_20250131_1825026142.thumb.jpg.93dd50449651e078ec65dde72476fa06.thumb.jpg.e40506c0a14aa7296922d371f8dbeea1.jpg

Edited by nevenbekriev
Link to comment
Share on other sites

As I lost trust to this new balance, decided to take a different route.

Removed roller jewel from new roller, made liquid shellac, installed new jewel into old roller with liquid shellac, heated by touching soldering iron to other side of roller.

Works just fine, no rate or regulation problems.

  • Like 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The post below contains the link. If you don't already have a discord account it will take you to the registration screen.  Registration is free.   https://www.watchrepairtalk.com/topic/31653-mark/?do=findComment&comment=279066
    • HWGIKE#57 Valex FEF 190 15 jewels Swiss lever full service and repair This one was waiting for a balance staff replacement in my cabinet parts and case cleaned up with a new balance staff and a 4th wheel as the original 4th wheel had a broken pivot for the off center second hand. I never attempted a balance staff replacement before however I received a Bergeon Molfres (i was hunting it for about 2 years) and with the help of it I managed to remove the old staff and riveted the new one in. It also received a new MS, crystal and the hole for the MS arbor was also tightened. With the new MS now it has an acceptable performance meaning that the amplitude goes up to 280 fully wound, has an acceptable beat error and I have the two nice lines but only dial up, dial down is not as nice and I could not figure out as why. I have the two lines but the amplitude is dropping to around 230 and the lines are a bit hairy. Both dial up and dial down the lines just go up and down without seemingly any pattern. I cleaned the movement two times, and then a 3rd time pegged out the main plate and train bridge holes but made no change. Both the HS collet and the roller table was too lose on the new staff... I did not count how many times I took the balance cock off to sort out the HS collet, the roller table and the beat error, somebody before me also shortened the HS by pushing it out a bit and it seems every time somebody is messing with the end of the HS the protruding bit is most of the time twisted bent etc. This one was probably one of the most challenging repair and service. I might take the new MS out and clean it lubricate it as I just pushed the new one in to the barrel from the retaining ring. Plus started to re-read the theory of the escapement and how to analyse the graph on the timing machine: Greiner Chronografic Record manual. I am also thinking to put the watch on a 24 hour long run with the eTimer SW it once helped me to figure out what was wrong with a watch. There is an interesting part of the Greiner record manual talking about the pallets and the end shake of the balance and pallet staff. Maybe this is my issue? Who could that possibly identify? After a few years now I am still without a clue how could watchmakers make parts I can only see with my microscope or how could/can they carry out complicated services impossible to do.. real magic..... .... ..... before I sent this post while the pics were uploading I had an idea, i was browsing the possible outcomes on the timing machine I had one for magnetism..... so I demagnetized the movement and it is not hairy now.... two really nice lines 0.2 ms beat error still a bit wavy, but a lot lot better..... argh....  
    • Hi there, welcome here.  
    • yes the advertising revenue should generate money. The question is how much money? Then as far as the cost of the website goes that's relatively easy to determine? all you would have to do to grasp costs and profitability would be to go to the link below and you can actually get a website for free try it out for free I believe you get no advertising initially. They also talk about that they'll help you out they have marketing tools and some sort of paid subscription or something. So I guess were shopping for a whatever just ask them what would a maybe could use this one as an example in other words it's going to look basically identical to this is going to have advertising a paid subscriptions what's it going to cost? After all they want to sell or give us a message board like this they should bill answer the questions as they're the people who did the software for this. Yes they really said you can have a free discussion group at least to start. https://invisioncommunity.com/ I was curious about the monthly supporter thing where exactly do we find that on this message board? A quick search I'm not finding it so obviously I'm not looking in the right place?
    • Help me out here, but with all the advertising on this site (which I don't mind) wouldn't it pay for itself or even make money for the owner ???
×
×
  • Create New...