Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

Hi,

presently struggling to remove the glass on my Doxa Sub 5000T Seaconqueror Sharkhunter.

(Nothing like giving the same thing loads of names to make it sound important)

 

I have removed Bezel, Click spring, Glass retainer, o-ring shim and top o-ring.

The o-ring broke due to old age whilst cleaning with a tissue.

Just cracked; Brittle after 10+yrs.

So it was time for a service.

 

There is a second gasket, around the base of the stepped glass, but i am struggling to remove this.

It is perished i think, and is coming out in pieces.

 

Any ideas, as i dont want to damage anything if there is a 'Trick'.

 

Thanks in advance.

 

Edited by Freebase
wrong model number, should have been 5000T
Posted

Hi, thanks for the reply.

(Photos attached)

You may be right, ref removal.

The first thing to confirm (for me).

Is the glass front mounted?

A few years ago the watch had a whack, and the 6 o'clock decal got dislodged.

I had to take the glass off to remove the decal with tweezers before it damaged the movement.

I had no trouble removing the glass then (as i recall)

But struggling now.

A few years on (and i still havn't put the decal back on)...

And the glass is now proving difficult to remove, with last seal.

It may have been damaged with Acetone, and rotted/perished into the space.

(I was rebuilding the hull of a GRP Fibreglass boat at the time)

So, a press from the rear, even if the glass is front mounted may be required.

Is that what you are suggesting.

Remove case back +movement, and press out from the rear.

Thank you.

 

 

IMG_1375.jpg

IMG_1376.jpg

IMG_1377.jpg

IMG_1378.jpg

IMG_1379.jpg

IMG_1380.jpg

The seal in question is the white ring visible as you move out from the second markers...

I believe it sits on the front face of the step of the glass.

 

Posted
2 hours ago, Freebase said:

So, a press from the rear, even if the glass is front mounted may be required.

Is that what you are suggesting.

Remove case back +movement, and press out from the rear.

Yes, that's the normal way to remove a lens.

The problem then becomes getting new gaskets if the old one is perished.

What's the reason for removing it?

Posted

Thanks, OK understood.

Guess i was just lucky the first time.

I think Cousins have gaskets, once i know what i'm looking for exactly.

If not ill contact Doxa (Hit and miss whether you get a result ot not)

In my own experience.

 

Reason was to service the gaskets.

I took the back off to check the rotor bearing (perfect)

And the rear case o-ring is no longer an o-ring.

It is flattened and hardened. 12 years old now.

Dont think it was sealing much to be honest.

So i thought i'd check the front, and it literally cracked apart.

Did not want to wait until the watch got water in it.

Caught this issue just in time by the looks of it.

Watch now out of service with damaged seals until i get it fully apart and can work out what i need as replacements.

Will also try Gleave & Co this time i think.

Never changed a glass/gasket set before, so again, thanks for the input.

It is appreciated.

Decided this year to do all my own watch work.

And to pro-actively maintain rather than just be reactive after a fault.

I am going to have to get more watches...

  • 1 month later...
Posted

@AndyGSi

You were correct, it is necessary to (remove all front parts; Bezel, retaining ring, "seal"Washer", and then remove rear case, crown, movement and then press glass out from the rear towards the front. As it turned out, The seal was brittle and cracked. Not sealing anything. It is now my held opinion, that all seals on a watch of this type should be replaced regularly. Or one or all will eventually fail without warning. (If they are actually used at sea and get submerged)

Just need to source a replacement glass and seal kit now...

Posted

The minute i posted i knew photos would be helpful.

You are correct again, it is am "L" profile, didn't spot this initially.

Dry as kindling.

More convinced that the acetone this has been subjected to has damaged it.

Just glad the seals didn't breach in use.

Movement is intact

IMG_1473.jpg

IMG_1472.jpg

IMG_1471.jpg

IMG_1469.jpg

IMG_1468.jpg

IMG_1466.jpg

IMG_1465.jpg

IMG_1464.jpg

IMG_1463.jpg

For completeness, i also post here the SUB 300T seal kit from cousins.

This is not the correct kit for the SUB 5000T.

doxa sub300T crystal and gasket-01.jpg

Posted

Agreed.

Which is why it is in pieces in a box.

Along with other watches i am servicing.

And also why i have ordered 3 watches in the last week alone, as cheap stand-ins.

The expensive items really do not stand up any better than cheaper alternatives if they get beaten to within an inch of scrap.

So, i'll take my time.

Meanwhile, 'Homage' is the way to go...

 

Posted

Good question.

The lens is rounded on the edge.

Tapering away towards the rear.

The plastic ring is larger diameter at front, redusing after the step, towards the rear.

Ring goes into case from front first.

Then lens, then seal and "washer" ring, then screw down metal ring.

Not my idea of how to seal glass.

Bearing in mind the plastic ring is against the ground glass edge.

But apparently works to 5000ft.

Not sure i entirely believe that after the stripdown.

 

Regardless, i'll find the parts eventually i'm sure.

I have yet to contact Doxa, been busy with other thinigs.

 

In passing, the ETA 2892A2 COSC movement has been faultless.

Never missed a beat in 10 yrs.

So i might yet just rehouse it.

 

I have also just received a Seagull ST2812 movement.

Which I may put in this case.

 

Thanks for the input.

If i make any progress i'll update.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Hi guys. @VWatchie Those images are self hosted (not hosted on this server). Do a look at the page source and you will see this. I’m afraid, I can’t have control or backup images not hosted on this server. ( They seem to be served from here: https://qehvsw.bn.files.1drv.com/) This server is backed up fully every night and the database is backed up and versioned every hour, all stored off site on Amazon S1 platform. It’s hard for us to lose data. Ive got a huge overhead of space on this particular server the site is served from so no worries there 🙂 Sorry all for lack of response so far, I have been extremely busy and am embarrassed to say that priorities had to be set in place for a while.  Be assured that i’ve got constant monitoring and alerts should the site be in an extended problematic state (down etc) and work on these issues if they arise.
    • Web sites are cheap. Message board are easy. Hosting both is less than 100 usd a year and small advertising would cover most of that.  In the discord group we did some 15 min poc and threw up a couple of different message boards on a domain i host.   The real value is the data / information / hive mind While I'm a rank amateur in watch repair the information and assistance on this board is invaluable. The members on here are friendly, entertaining and a wealth of knowledge This is what needs to be preserved  --Jeff
    • The post below contains the link. If you don't already have a discord account it will take you to the registration screen.  Registration is free.   https://www.watchrepairtalk.com/topic/31653-mark/?do=findComment&comment=279066
    • HWGIKE#57 Valex FEF 190 15 jewels Swiss lever full service and repair This one was waiting for a balance staff replacement in my cabinet parts and case cleaned up with a new balance staff and a 4th wheel as the original 4th wheel had a broken pivot for the off center second hand. I never attempted a balance staff replacement before however I received a Bergeon Molfres (i was hunting it for about 2 years) and with the help of it I managed to remove the old staff and riveted the new one in. It also received a new MS, crystal and the hole for the MS arbor was also tightened. With the new MS now it has an acceptable performance meaning that the amplitude goes up to 280 fully wound, has an acceptable beat error and I have the two nice lines but only dial up, dial down is not as nice and I could not figure out as why. I have the two lines but the amplitude is dropping to around 230 and the lines are a bit hairy. Both dial up and dial down the lines just go up and down without seemingly any pattern. I cleaned the movement two times, and then a 3rd time pegged out the main plate and train bridge holes but made no change. Both the HS collet and the roller table was too lose on the new staff... I did not count how many times I took the balance cock off to sort out the HS collet, the roller table and the beat error, somebody before me also shortened the HS by pushing it out a bit and it seems every time somebody is messing with the end of the HS the protruding bit is most of the time twisted bent etc. This one was probably one of the most challenging repair and service. I might take the new MS out and clean it lubricate it as I just pushed the new one in to the barrel from the retaining ring. Plus started to re-read the theory of the escapement and how to analyse the graph on the timing machine: Greiner Chronografic Record manual. I am also thinking to put the watch on a 24 hour long run with the eTimer SW it once helped me to figure out what was wrong with a watch. There is an interesting part of the Greiner record manual talking about the pallets and the end shake of the balance and pallet staff. Maybe this is my issue? Who could that possibly identify? After a few years now I am still without a clue how could watchmakers make parts I can only see with my microscope or how could/can they carry out complicated services impossible to do.. real magic..... .... ..... before I sent this post while the pics were uploading I had an idea, i was browsing the possible outcomes on the timing machine I had one for magnetism..... so I demagnetized the movement and it is not hairy now.... two really nice lines 0.2 ms beat error still a bit wavy, but a lot lot better..... argh....  
    • Hi there, welcome here.  
×
×
  • Create New...