Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I've been buying far fewer watches in the latter half of this year than in previous years - using money for other pursuits - having decided to move away from the selected "cheapies but goodies" on eBay in favour of more considered purchases.

 

The last watch I bought was a Christopher Ward C1000 auto, which I've worn virtually every day since getting it - and very nice it is too - and now I've picked up this very smart Le Coultre from 1956. [seller's] photos:

 

post-64-0-14490500-1449062038_thumb.jpg

post-64-0-78231000-1449062038_thumb.jpg

 

Some info on Le Coultre for those interested:

 

United States duty regulations made it more cost effective to import Jaeger LeCoultre movements, dials, crowns and hands into the USA from Switzerland and for the cases to be manufactured in the States. In the 1950’s the Longines Wittnauer group was the distributor of LeCoultre watches and Vacheron & Constantin watches sold in North America. The Longines Wittnauer group did not manufacture Jaeger LeCoultre watches as some people mistakenly believe, the movements were produced in the Swiss Jaeger LeCoultre factory at Le Sentier and were identical in every way to movements distributed within Europe other than the LeCoultre markings on the watch. The cases were manufactured under licence in the United States and were marked "Cased and Timed in the USA by LeCoultre". In approximately 1985 the brand name "Jaeger LeCoultre" was adopted worldwide.

 

Some people believe that because LeCoultre movements are signed "VXN" on the bridge (denoting Vacheron & Constantin), they were manufactured by Vacheron & Constantin. This is incorrect. Jaeger LeCoultre supplied movements to Vacheron & Constantin, which were used in their watches but not vice versa. The only collaboration that ever took place between these two prestigious watchmakers was the "Galaxy" diamond dial model. The Galaxy was marketed by both companies; with the case marked "Vacheron & Constantin - LeCoultre Inc." and the dial signed "LeCoultre".

 

Cheers,

 

Will

  • Like 6
Posted

Very nice Will, I would imagine the click is on the underside.

Absolutely - but where exactly I wouldn't care to say. Presumably in an equivalent area to a more conventional topside click.

 

To be honest, I don't see the advantage of a buried click, other than neatness, as there's more stripping of the movement to be done if the click spring should break, etc. But who am I...

Posted

Handsome watch, Will.

The click is hidden under the ratchet wheel. You can see the head of the click at the grove next to the ratchet wheel.

b05637ebd5183795f2422023b08b611d.jpg

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Posted

Problem solved, watchitis cleared to go...beautiful watch Will, I'm sure you'll get bored to wear it soon so feel free to send it over when you do! :)

 

Cheers,

 

Bob

 

PS. Quality is watchitis stage II, by the way. I'm getting it now too...

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

That's a real class watch you have there Will, I like the dial nice and simple and very clear to see. The movements were always a pleasure to work on well made and easy, no stupid fiddly bits. Its a real gem.  

Posted

i saw this a while back and forgot to comment - this is a beautiful watch! very clean looking and so classic. you can't beat anything from the fifties - except for their size.

what size is this, will?

Posted

I'm glad I joined this forum.  Now I realise that I am not alone in having this mania to buy watches!  Will...that is one beautiful watch.  It reminds me of two watches my father owned (and which I cannot, for the life of me, find) one was a LANCO and the other was a Grimsel.  They both kept wonderful time...only going out by about ten seconds a day, if that.

 

Like you I am often on "Fleabay" looking at what make a good cheap purchase.  What amazes me is the way the Chinese have moved along in making nice-looking automatic watches with complications.  Some even look like they have tourbillon movements.  The higher priced ones might really be tourbillons!

Posted

32 mm. that's about right for a 50's watch. i love their style, but i need at least a 35 to 38mm watch to make it look halfway decent on my wrist.

i have an almost perfect 10 bulova auto that i'm looking to sell because i never wear it.  it is 32mm and just too small.

Posted

32 mm. that's about right for a 50's watch. i love their style, but i need at least a 35 to 38mm watch to make it look halfway decent on my wrist.

i have an almost perfect 10 bulova auto that i'm looking to sell because i never wear it.  it is 32mm and just too small.

I'm in the same boat.  I have a few family heirloom watches that are truly works of art from the 50s and 60s but they are too small for my fat wrist.  They end up looking like kid's watches.

  • Like 1
Posted

I'm in the same boat.  I have a few family heirloom watches that are truly works of art from the 50s and 60s but they are too small for my fat wrist.  They end up looking like kid's watches.

You can, if you wish, donate watches that are too small for you, to the Watchitis Research Fund. Just drop an email to [email protected] for the address...

:D

  • Like 3

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Ok, as per pictures I have a smiths rim set and wind on the bench, swimming in oil but all sorted. The fault I have is the mainspring bridle has lost its tab/notch/hook, like a hebdomas pocket watch the mainspring is fitted to a bridal in the barrel which slides around on full wind onto 4 notches in the barrel wall, thus stopping damage to the mainspring by over enthusiastic winding. So my questiion is this, what is the best way to create another hook in the bridal, my thoughts are along the same lines as making a new hole in the mainspring end, annealing etc, but what and how to make the hook?? I have a pair of barrel hook pliers that work great in soft brass but won’t even scratch the bridal, what I don’t want to do is whack a hole into it and not have a hook. the pictures are of the bridal ( broken) and a hebdomas ( complete ) incase you are wondering what I’m on about. And a few of the serivce. Thanks for any advise.
    • Decided to give the case and bracelet a good cleaning and my first shot at polishing/brushing. Went with the Cape Cod polishing cloth and gray scotch brite method.  Before First; Then After; Then comparing to some original links from when the watch was new to now.       
    • What is this (left of the red line)? hairspring? Frank
    • It's either bent or hung up on something or both. The hexane won't hurt it, and hanging from a balance tack indefinitely won't hurt it.   If the spring is glued to the stud there's a chance that the glue was softened and the outer coil stuck to the stud. Haven't seen that happen, but I suppose it could. Don't know if hexane affects the glue used either.
    • Hello all. some help required here from the community please. I serviced this movement, which was running reasonably well, but the balance spring which was running healthily before I started, after cleaning in hexane for 30 secs, is all bunched up at the stud. I did store the balalance on a tack thereafter for a day.   could the spring be strained under gravity? I demagnetised of course, and the balance is squeaky clean. some help would be much appreciated. Thanks, Tony G    
×
×
  • Create New...