Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

After servicing, I spun the motion works by turning the spring drum and everything turns correctly, but it felt like it took more effort than it should. My suspicion is confirmed because I have to wind the spring a lot to get the balance wheel going, plus the watch will only run for a bit more than an hour. I had lubricated as shown on videos and I find no faults in the parts or bearings. What are some things that could cause this? Thanks for any help!

Posted (edited)

If you are sure that the balance is spinning freely? - a blast from a puffer and it should still be moving well after 30s.

Is the gear train running freely - without the pallet or barrel, blow with a puffer and check it all spins freely. Check endshake of all wheels.

A common problem is wear on the barrel bridge arbor hole. Remove the ratchet wheel from the barrel, stick some pegwood in the barrel arbor thread and check for side shake, and up and down for end shake.  Too much and the barrel can touch the brige, mainplate or a wheel.

You can see how to check in this video

 

Edited by mikepilk
  • Thanks 2
Posted

 Concurring  with Mike, barrel lid ought be fitted in the barrel & sit flush level with the barrel wall, check if its level ( first ) as you lift the barrel bridge when disassembling.

Barrel lid must fit tight in the barrel.

 Check if mainspring is coned, which can happen when previous watch destroyer has pulled the spring out of the barrel. Coned mainspring can push out a loosely fitted  barrel lid.

The click also can diminish spring's torque.

Good luck 

 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted

Wow, I watched that video. I hadn't thought of that! First, I will find out if the arbor hole is oversized. I'll let you know what I find, and if I can correct it. Thanks for your time!

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This is the old/first(?) way for making a mainspring for an automatic. "Evolution-wise" it is an logical first step forward from a standard spring. Usually these are indeed replaced with a new spring with an integrated/fixed bridle. Lubrication as you would do with any automatic.
    • I'm working on a Schild AS 1250 (a 'bumper' automatic) and it's the first time I've seen a mainspring like this. It has what looks like a regular manual-wind mainspring with a 'hook' at its outer extremity. On a manual-wind watch that 'hook' would engage with a 'hook' in the barrel wall to prevent it from rotating. However, the AS 1250's mainspring does not engage directly with the barrel but rather with a 'sliding bridle' that sits between the mainspring and the barrel wall, and evidently facilitates the slip necessary in an automatic. I'm not sure what advantage this two-piece configuration provides, but it highlights a gap (one of many) in my horological knowledge. I'm not sure if 'hook' is the correct term as used above, but please see photo below to see what I mean. Therefore, two questions please. 1. What is the proper way to lubricate a barrel from an automatic watch with a sliding bridle? My guess is the same as any automatic ms/barrel (e.g, a few dabs of braking grease on the interior barrel wall). What do the experts say? 2. I purchased a Generale Ressorts GR3472X mainspring, made for the AS 1250. It looks like the bridle is included and I don't need to salvage and re-use the old one. Is this a safe assumption? Thanks for the advice. If you have any other wisdom you'd like to share about separate sliding mainspring bridles, I would be very interested. Cheers!
    • Thank you Hector. You too matey 😊
    • Bless you, Mark. May you live long and prosper!
    • That’s a nice idea, But i’m committed to providing this site as a gift to the watch repair community as my thank you for my incredible life i’ve had in this business. Ive done well and unless my financial circumstances change then i’m more than happy to foot the bill. If circumstances do change then be assured that I will make an appeal. For now, I’m comfortable with the way things are and I am extremely delighted to remove Google Ads from this site and to stop Patreon, it feels like a major step forward 🙂 Sorry, I missed your reply, I got blinded by another poster in this thread. Yes - I can confirm that I have always seen WRT as a not-for-profit website, and therefore - not a business as such. I’m lucky and have done well in my life due to a decision made in my teens to start a watch repairing apprenticeship which has sustained myself and my family for many years now. Consider this my small way of paying it forward. Ive been committed to keeping the site alive on a technical and financial level for over 10 years now and I have zero plans to change that. Thank you for your kind words by the way. And as for your wish - nobody can control what happens in life, if something happens to me I have things in place with my family but I’m just not comfortable talking about my personal business - I wish a certain person would respect that, but i’ve calmed down now - i’m only human 😄  
×
×
  • Create New...