Jump to content

Rebushing an out of round barrel bushing


Recommended Posts

I'm stripping down this Bulova 10BRC and inspection showed this out of round barrel bushing. I *wont* be rebushing it as I don't have the skill yet but hopefully someday.  However, I was wondering if I were going to rebush it, how would I locate where the exact center of the bushing should be when placing the new bushing?

10brc-barrel.thumb.jpg.0b8ddfedeb27fdae73816486344bc04a.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My (not particularly expert) thoughts would be:

The outer bore for the ratchet wheel should be concentric with the original hole position.

And possibly simpler but a bit crude - The arbour only turns while the watch is being wound, so look which way the arbour is pushed by the action of the crown wheel while winding it? It looks like to the right by torque and down by the angle of the wheel teeth?

From that I'd guess that the lower right in the photo is the badly worn area and the upper left is the nearest untouched area, that could be used as a reference for a close fitting stake or drill to locate the plate before opening the hole for the bush. That's what I'd try - though on a junk movement first to be sure it worked!

 

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, HectorLooi said:

Idealy for this job, the barrel bridge should be mounted on a faceplate, roughly centred with the faceplate's centering pin. Then confirmed with an optical centering microscope.

Only if drilling a new hole in the plate, this is bushed only the bushing needs replacing 

 

Tom

Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, tomh207 said:

It’s a bushing, the hole will/should be concentric with the outer diameter, you don’t need to figure out where it should be.

Tom

I'm not clear on what that means. My very limited understanding is that a larger hole would first need to be reamed and then a bushing placed in that hole. But given that the current hole is not completely concentric (it's somewhat oval), how is the exact center point determined?

 

28 minutes ago, HectorLooi said:

Idealy for this job, the barrel bridge should be mounted on a faceplate, roughly centred with the faceplate's centering pin. Then confirmed with an optical centering microscope.

Is a 'faceplate' part of a lathe? I don't know what a center pin is either, so I guess I'm probably way over my head on this.

2 minutes ago, tomh207 said:

Only if drilling a new hole in the plate, this is bushed only the bushing needs replacing 

 

Tom

Oh, I get what you mean now. Yeah, that makes sense. It didn't occur to me that the center part of the circle in the plate could be pushed out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, tomh207 said:

Only if drilling a new hole in the plate, this is bushed only the bushing needs replacing 

 

Tom

I don't think there was a bush originally. If there was an old bushing, just ream it out.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I guess there is no bushing, I guess OP just used this word instead of 'bearing hole'. To press a bushing there the hole first needs to be enlarged or bored and yes, face plate on lathe is the normal choice for the way to do this. But, on the flat face of a brass piece may be turned small step in the center, with the diam of the arbor pivot, it can be used to center the bridge when gluing it on the face with shellac.

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm no expert on faceplates (still making the clamps for mine) but could either one of these diameters be used to help center the piece? Or would the hole originally be machined in another setup?

Screenshot_20250320_070143_Chrome.jpg

Edited by caseback
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, nevenbekriev said:

I guess there is no bushing, I guess OP just used this word instead of 'bearing hole'. To press a bushing there the hole first needs to be enlarged or bored and yes, face plate on lathe is the normal choice for the way to do this. But, on the flat face of a brass piece may be turned small step in the center, with the diam of the arbor pivot, it can be used to center the bridge when gluing it on the face with shellac.

I guess the brass step would then be drilled out along with the new hole for the bush Nev.

16 minutes ago, caseback said:

I'm no expert on faceplates (still making the clamps for mine) but could either one of these diameters be used to help center the piece? Or would the hole originally be machined in another setup?

Screenshot_20250320_070143_Chrome.jpg

I was thinking the same a while back Cees, I cant remember when or what I was looking at, I expected the bearing hole to be concentric with the milled circles , but it wasn't, it will have been a cheap movement though. 

Theres a great video by " times radical " where he bushes the plate on a Rolex. The guys ways are...a bit controversial . But the tool he used was very nice.  A hand driven faceplate  with a rear mount holder for reamers. It looked very accurate. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Having slept on it - and realised that I have now got a suitable lathe - my new approach would be to turn a bit of brass to fit the ratchet wheel outer bore and drill the centre to act as a guide to drill though as a guide for the bushing drill.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, rjenkinsgb said:

Having slept on it - and realised that I have now got a suitable lathe - my new approach would be to turn a bit of brass to fit the ratchet wheel outer bore and drill the centre to act as a guide to drill though as a guide for the bushing drill.

That will work, providing the original hole was concentric with the outer bore. But as @Neverenoughwatches points out, that is not always the case.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, caseback said:

I'm no expert on faceplates (still making the clamps for mine) but could either one of these diameters be used to help center the piece? Or would the hole originally be machined in another setup?

Screenshot_20250320_070143_Chrome.jpg

These other features can be concentric, but aren't necessarily and often simply aren't.

 

My preferred method is like Hector says, faceplate with optical centering. You can see quite easily the unworn portion of the hole and center on it.

 

But- many watchmakers simply ream out the hole with the jeweling tool, press in a bushing and off it goes. There's the false belief that the reamer somehow (magically?) follows the original hole, but what's really happening is the hole center becomes the average of the original center and worn center- and this is usually good enough that all's well. However, when opening a hole like this to take a bushing one would have to go through several sizes of reamer to get the hole large enough for a reasonable bushing, and each reaming operation risks drifting the hole a little more (even in a jeweling tool with everything just so they can drift).

 

10 hours ago, GuyMontag said:

 

Is a 'faceplate' part of a lathe? I don't know what a center pin is either, so I guess I'm probably way over my head on this.

 

This is a faceplate. In the image a "wobble stick" is being used to find the center. The pointed end goes in the hole, the body rests on the T-rest, and the extended end nutates as the faceplate is slowly turned, indicating the out of center direction. You can get very well centered with this method, but it takes more time than optical centering. It doesn't account for a worn hole though- it will average the location of the original and worn locations.

 

 

faceplate.jpg

Edited by nickelsilver
  • Like 3
  • Thanks 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, rjenkinsgb said:

Having slept on it - and realised that I have now got a suitable lathe - my new approach would be to turn a bit of brass to fit the ratchet wheel outer bore and drill the centre to act as a guide to drill though as a guide for the bushing drill.

My take on it is to make a wax chuck that has a tight arbor to take the plate or bridge bearing. Once the plate is cemented up, the arbor is drilled out with the new bush hole.

1 hour ago, nickelsilver said:

You can get very well centered with this method, but it takes more time than optical centering. It doesn't account for a worn hole though- it will average the location of the original and worn locations.

So the wobble stick method is a bit more accurate than multiple reamers in a jewelling frame ?  Taking just one drilling operation in a faceplate.  What are seeing through your optical centering device Nicklesilver ? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Neverenoughwatches said:

 

So the wobble stick method is a bit more accurate than multiple reamers in a jewelling frame ?  Taking just one drilling operation in a faceplate.  What are seeing through your optical centering device Nicklesilver ? 

The wobble stick is more certain to keep the hole on center. Then the hole gets bored in the faceplate, with the slide rest. Drill is another very uncertain way to put a hole in a true location. It can work, but it often doesn't work perfectly.

 

I see the part through my optical centering device!

Edited by nickelsilver
  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

As a alternative optical centering microscope, I've ordered something that is called an "usb otoscope".Screenshot_20250320_125919_Google.thumb.jpg.5fd6e3af41a14463b7e5574759596cf2.jpg Apparantly it is a tiny camera meant for looking in one's ears.. but it looks slim enough to fit in the tailstock. Worth a shot imo. I'll let you know if it works or not..

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Neverenoughwatches said:

Sorry Nicklesilver I meant - are you lining up the center of the hole with a cross hair ?

Yes, my scopes have cross hairs and concentric circles. There are some dedicated centering scopes with one hair, which is all that's needed. You move around until it's near the border of the hole and it just serves as a reference.

 

20250320_141334.jpg

 

I do lots and lots of faceplate work, so I have a dedicated setup that's a bit extravagant but for all the use it sees worth it. The faceplate is on a 35mm quill, which can switch out between a measuring microscope (a Hauser M1 jig borer, but it only gets used as a scope) and a short Schaublin 102 lathe bed. Parts get glued to a little base, then that goes in the faceplate and gets centered on the scope (the base gets tapped with a brass bar, having the part glued like this avoids any damage), then over to the lathe. Centering to a couple microns takes about 30 seconds.

 

This was a LeCoultre 409 that needed a new jewel. I bored out the rub-in setting, and put the new jewel in a bushing that mimics the look of the setting.

 

IMG_0034 (Large).JPG

IMG_0035 (Large).JPG

IMG_0036 (Large).JPG

IMG_0037 (Large).JPG

IMG_0038 (Large).JPG

 

IMG_0039.JPG

 

 

IMG_0040.JPG

 

 

Edited by nickelsilver
  • Like 5
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, nickelsilver said:

Yes, my scopes have cross hairs and concentric circles. There are some dedicated centering scopes with one hair, which is all that's needed. You move around until it's near the border of the hole and it just serves as a reference.

 

 

20250320_141334.jpg

Thats cool, are the hairs integrated into the eyepiece ?  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)

 

6 hours ago, nickelsilver said:

But- many watchmakers simply ream out the hole with the jeweling tool, press in a bushing and off it goes. There's the false belief that the reamer somehow (magically?) follows the original hole, but what's really happening is the hole center becomes the average of the original center and worn center- and this is usually good enough that all's well. However, when opening a hole like this to take a bushing one would have to go through several sizes of reamer to get the hole large enough for a reasonable bushing, and each reaming operation risks drifting the hole a little more (even in a jeweling tool with everything just so they can drift).

I can see how even a new bushing that isn't completely centered could be 'good enough' for some as I was surprised just how well this 65 year old watch that hadn't been serviced in many decades was running, especially the amplitude given how worn that barrel arbor bearing is.
 

Screenshot2025-03-20at08-43-21EditableTable.png.f1b197d226ff932a1ea2a80c9a9bb3f8.png

 

 

6 hours ago, nickelsilver said:

These other features can be concentric, but aren't necessarily and often simply aren't.

 

My preferred method is like Hector says, faceplate with optical centering. You can see quite easily the unworn portion of the hole and center on it.

 

But- many watchmakers simply ream out the hole with the jeweling tool, press in a bushing and off it goes. There's the false belief that the reamer somehow (magically?) follows the original hole, but what's really happening is the hole center becomes the average of the original center and worn center- and this is usually good enough that all's well. However, when opening a hole like this to take a bushing one would have to go through several sizes of reamer to get the hole large enough for a reasonable bushing, and each reaming operation risks drifting the hole a little more (even in a jeweling tool with everything just so they can drift).

 

This is a faceplate. In the image a "wobble stick" is being used to find the center. The pointed end goes in the hole, the body rests on the T-rest, and the extended end nutates as the faceplate is slowly turned, indicating the out of center direction. You can get very well centered with this method, but it takes more time than optical centering. It doesn't account for a worn hole though- it will average the location of the original and worn locations.

 

 

faceplate.jpg

Thanks, seeing that photo really helps in understanding what was being said.

Edited by GuyMontag
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Neverenoughwatches said:

My take on it is to make a wax chuck that has a tight arbor to take the plate or bridge bearing. Once the plate is cemented up, the arbor is drilled out with the new bush hole.

This is what I tried to say in my post

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The post below contains the link. If you don't already have a discord account it will take you to the registration screen.  Registration is free.   https://www.watchrepairtalk.com/topic/31653-mark/?do=findComment&comment=279066
    • HWGIKE#57 Valex FEF 190 15 jewels Swiss lever full service and repair This one was waiting for a balance staff replacement in my cabinet parts and case cleaned up with a new balance staff and a 4th wheel as the original 4th wheel had a broken pivot for the off center second hand. I never attempted a balance staff replacement before however I received a Bergeon Molfres (i was hunting it for about 2 years) and with the help of it I managed to remove the old staff and riveted the new one in. It also received a new MS, crystal and the hole for the MS arbor was also tightened. With the new MS now it has an acceptable performance meaning that the amplitude goes up to 280 fully wound, has an acceptable beat error and I have the two nice lines but only dial up, dial down is not as nice and I could not figure out as why. I have the two lines but the amplitude is dropping to around 230 and the lines are a bit hairy. Both dial up and dial down the lines just go up and down without seemingly any pattern. I cleaned the movement two times, and then a 3rd time pegged out the main plate and train bridge holes but made no change. Both the HS collet and the roller table was too lose on the new staff... I did not count how many times I took the balance cock off to sort out the HS collet, the roller table and the beat error, somebody before me also shortened the HS by pushing it out a bit and it seems every time somebody is messing with the end of the HS the protruding bit is most of the time twisted bent etc. This one was probably one of the most challenging repair and service. I might take the new MS out and clean it lubricate it as I just pushed the new one in to the barrel from the retaining ring. Plus started to re-read the theory of the escapement and how to analyse the graph on the timing machine: Greiner Chronografic Record manual. I am also thinking to put the watch on a 24 hour long run with the eTimer SW it once helped me to figure out what was wrong with a watch. There is an interesting part of the Greiner record manual talking about the pallets and the end shake of the balance and pallet staff. Maybe this is my issue? Who could that possibly identify? After a few years now I am still without a clue how could watchmakers make parts I can only see with my microscope or how could/can they carry out complicated services impossible to do.. real magic..... .... ..... before I sent this post while the pics were uploading I had an idea, i was browsing the possible outcomes on the timing machine I had one for magnetism..... so I demagnetized the movement and it is not hairy now.... two really nice lines 0.2 ms beat error still a bit wavy, but a lot lot better..... argh....  
    • Hi there, welcome here.  
    • yes the advertising revenue should generate money. The question is how much money? Then as far as the cost of the website goes that's relatively easy to determine? all you would have to do to grasp costs and profitability would be to go to the link below and you can actually get a website for free try it out for free I believe you get no advertising initially. They also talk about that they'll help you out they have marketing tools and some sort of paid subscription or something. So I guess were shopping for a whatever just ask them what would a maybe could use this one as an example in other words it's going to look basically identical to this is going to have advertising a paid subscriptions what's it going to cost? After all they want to sell or give us a message board like this they should bill answer the questions as they're the people who did the software for this. Yes they really said you can have a free discussion group at least to start. https://invisioncommunity.com/ I was curious about the monthly supporter thing where exactly do we find that on this message board? A quick search I'm not finding it so obviously I'm not looking in the right place?
    • Help me out here, but with all the advertising on this site (which I don't mind) wouldn't it pay for itself or even make money for the owner ???
×
×
  • Create New...