Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Hi all of you,

I had an opportunity to buy a vintage watch early in the morning. It is supposed to be a Longines with a 25.17 movement. As there are some buyers who react very quickly when they see a new watch on that website, I had to make my mind at once. I made some researched immediately, and then I decided to get that watch. After that, I made some additional research, and I think it might be a real Longines.

Would you have the same opinion as you look at the pictures attached?

 

2d0ca5779cd24e03348b64bd078417c90f352d39.jpg

27bd4eaae3eee95be6b761141f1219bdc4012443.jpg

a8662caf674f3533e275c9a2187666efa75718c3.jpg

bec9b38652838ce162dc0a909ded97d11acc7a10.jpg

d868a9bde0d994d1b36ab4f3700ff2b1682c3b67.jpg

e434a4fe961bc14743412157bdf369f41789404f.jpg

Posted

Does that mean it's a fake? I had a look on SERIAL-NUMBER-DECODER.CO.UK which confirms that the serial number 5472134 refers to 1936, but the website indicates that "I have estimated dates for years where I couldn't find any information so please consider this a guide only, it should be within a couple of years either way".

I had a try with another website which indicates 1937 and a third one which indicates 1936 (approximately). 

May I still hope that it's a real Longines? If not ... I've been to quick in my decision🥴

Posted (edited)

It may just not be a 25.17 movement but I don't know enough about Longines to what came later.

Edit

Just found this which dates to 1935 so maybe the 25.17 was made before 1939 as stated on Ranfft.

https://www.joseph-watches.com/all-products/longines-cal-25-17-stainless-steel-1930s/

Re Edit

Done i little more searching and to me it looks like Ranfft is wrong
but can't find what actual date these were first produced.

Looking at other examples my thoughts would be it's a genuine movement but the dial
and case both look wrong so I suppose it all comes down to what you paid for it.

Edited by AndyGSi
Posted (edited)

Longines have a service where you can send the serial number and they will tell you the date and name of the agent the watch was sent to. 

I'm not sure about the case, but I would expect "Longines" on the dial

Edited by mikepilk
  • Like 2
Posted

I beleive Its a Longines, couple of variants to this calib were made,  one with flat and several  with overcoil H/S, overcoils were furthure modified, thus new designations.

 TG reveals it's  worth, when serviced. 

 

 

 

Posted
7 hours ago, mikepilk said:

Longines have a service where you can send the serial number and they will tell you the date and name of the agent the watch was sent to. 

I'm not sure about the case, but I would expect "Longines" on the dial

Yep,  used it and they are pretty fast!

Posted
On 4/10/2025 at 7:12 PM, mikepilk said:

Longines have a service where you can send the serial number and they will tell you the date and name of the agent the watch was sent to. 

I'm not sure about the case, but I would expect "Longines" on the dial

The thing is you have to provide Longines with a serial number AND a reference number when you fill the form. I have the first one on the movement, but I can't see the other one, which sould look like L.xxxxxxxxxx. I mentionned the number inside the case and I sent the mail. Wait and see...

Here are some picture I took yesterday when I received the watch. 

20250417_195820.jpg

20250417_200048.jpg

Posted
7 hours ago, BlueHarp said:

The thing is you have to provide Longines with a serial number AND a reference number when you fill the form. I have the first one on the movement, but I can't see the other one, which sould look like L.xxxxxxxxxx. I mentionned the number inside the case and I sent the mail. Wait and see...

The number in the case (1444) is the reference number. On older movements it's a shorter number.

When I applied I sent the serial number from the movement and the reference number on the case back. In my case for a 1967 Cal 30L the case number was 7855.

Posted

Thank you so much! So I think I provided the right information. I just have to wait now. I have disassembled / cleaned / reassembled the watch. Still alive 😀

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This is probably the single most important point. One of my best friends, 48 years old at the time, suffered a massive stroke about 15 years ago. He barely survived, but his life was never the same after that. If you had asked me back then to guess which of my friends might have a stroke and nearly die, he would have been the very last one I'd have picked. He was perfectly healthy, played tennis three times a week, ran a successful business, was full of life, and had a wonderful wife and well-behaved teenage kids. The harsh truth is, we never know when it’s "game over." @Mark, I truly wish you a long, happy, and successful life. But have you given any thought to some kind of backup plan for WRT in case the worst should happen? Is there anyone who could keep the site going? If you can reassure us in some way, it would mean more than a lot to us!
    • Looks like glass with that bevel edge.
    • Update: The demagnetization only helped temporarily, maybe it pulled the wheels into a position where they liked each other. I have to adjust the sub second hand as it is a bit angled upwards and catching the minute hand stopping the whole movement but before this happened there were some wild deviations. HWGIKE#58 Alarm clock, cooked in hot cleaning fluid and oiled gently. This is a movement so I count it. 🙂 A while ago it tried to fly away one day, it was on my windows sill, we had strong wind the curtain flew like a flag and doing so encouraged my clock to do the same...  went out and ended up on the roof above the entrance door, its door in pieces but the clock itself suffered no damage otherwise. The original glass was already broken when I received it I still have the bottom part in two pieces. The new "glass" is acrylic. It also had a paper in the back in the case inside but it disintegrated, I still have a little bit of  piece of that too.     HWGIKE#59 Durowe 870 / Times M84 This particular instance is a D870, when I saw its worn out contact pin I thought that it must be a design flaw, and here we go: https://17jewels.info/movements/d/durowe/durowe-870/ An incredible movement again where the balance wheel drives the train and has two magnets one for the balance wheel/coil and one for the pallet. The magnet for the pallet is basically the "draw" one direction. The coil is about 1.8kOhm and one end is in contact with the main plate and the other end is soldered to a contact pin which is insulated by the means of putting it into a jewel and this contact pin is rubbing against a wire getting the energy/impulse as it is passing. Behind the contact pin there is an "impulse jewel" not sure why is it there... the wire seems to hit the impulse jewel first then the contact pin but maybe it is there only for insulation purposes? I was almost certain that the screw holding down the battery - (minus) clamp had no insulation washer.. i only noticed the green stuff around it coming from battery leakage... anyway the + and - had a shortcut which took me a while to realize.. had to fabricate one insulating washer on my own. The jewel settings were dirty but not it is all cleaned and oiled. The contact pin might work for a while but I am sure it has a short life. It is a front loader the whole thing is held together by the case so it is not possible to regulate it without putting it all together and taking the movement out of the case again, very inconvenient. A wonderful movement but not made for eternity only for the consumer market.  
    • Is it a crystal or an acrylic and just foggy with age?
    • The point I missed to make !   is ; moisture in the movement is the main problem, it can ruin  electronic components.   
×
×
  • Create New...