Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Hi all of you,

I had an opportunity to buy a vintage watch early in the morning. It is supposed to be a Longines with a 25.17 movement. As there are some buyers who react very quickly when they see a new watch on that website, I had to make my mind at once. I made some researched immediately, and then I decided to get that watch. After that, I made some additional research, and I think it might be a real Longines.

Would you have the same opinion as you look at the pictures attached?

 

2d0ca5779cd24e03348b64bd078417c90f352d39.jpg

27bd4eaae3eee95be6b761141f1219bdc4012443.jpg

a8662caf674f3533e275c9a2187666efa75718c3.jpg

bec9b38652838ce162dc0a909ded97d11acc7a10.jpg

d868a9bde0d994d1b36ab4f3700ff2b1682c3b67.jpg

e434a4fe961bc14743412157bdf369f41789404f.jpg

Posted

Does that mean it's a fake? I had a look on SERIAL-NUMBER-DECODER.CO.UK which confirms that the serial number 5472134 refers to 1936, but the website indicates that "I have estimated dates for years where I couldn't find any information so please consider this a guide only, it should be within a couple of years either way".

I had a try with another website which indicates 1937 and a third one which indicates 1936 (approximately). 

May I still hope that it's a real Longines? If not ... I've been to quick in my decision🥴

Posted (edited)

It may just not be a 25.17 movement but I don't know enough about Longines to what came later.

Edit

Just found this which dates to 1935 so maybe the 25.17 was made before 1939 as stated on Ranfft.

https://www.joseph-watches.com/all-products/longines-cal-25-17-stainless-steel-1930s/

Re Edit

Done i little more searching and to me it looks like Ranfft is wrong
but can't find what actual date these were first produced.

Looking at other examples my thoughts would be it's a genuine movement but the dial
and case both look wrong so I suppose it all comes down to what you paid for it.

Edited by AndyGSi
Posted (edited)

Longines have a service where you can send the serial number and they will tell you the date and name of the agent the watch was sent to. 

I'm not sure about the case, but I would expect "Longines" on the dial

Edited by mikepilk
  • Like 2
Posted

I beleive Its a Longines, couple of variants to this calib were made,  one with flat and several  with overcoil H/S, overcoils were furthure modified, thus new designations.

 TG reveals it's  worth, when serviced. 

 

 

 

Posted
7 hours ago, mikepilk said:

Longines have a service where you can send the serial number and they will tell you the date and name of the agent the watch was sent to. 

I'm not sure about the case, but I would expect "Longines" on the dial

Yep,  used it and they are pretty fast!

  • Like 1
Posted
On 4/10/2025 at 7:12 PM, mikepilk said:

Longines have a service where you can send the serial number and they will tell you the date and name of the agent the watch was sent to. 

I'm not sure about the case, but I would expect "Longines" on the dial

The thing is you have to provide Longines with a serial number AND a reference number when you fill the form. I have the first one on the movement, but I can't see the other one, which sould look like L.xxxxxxxxxx. I mentionned the number inside the case and I sent the mail. Wait and see...

Here are some picture I took yesterday when I received the watch. 

20250417_195820.jpg

20250417_200048.jpg

Posted
7 hours ago, BlueHarp said:

The thing is you have to provide Longines with a serial number AND a reference number when you fill the form. I have the first one on the movement, but I can't see the other one, which sould look like L.xxxxxxxxxx. I mentionned the number inside the case and I sent the mail. Wait and see...

The number in the case (1444) is the reference number. On older movements it's a shorter number.

When I applied I sent the serial number from the movement and the reference number on the case back. In my case for a 1967 Cal 30L the case number was 7855.

Posted

Thank you so much! So I think I provided the right information. I just have to wait now. I have disassembled / cleaned / reassembled the watch. Still alive 😀

Posted

The movement is a genuine Longines calibre 25.17, and is the version with the flat hairspring (no Breguet overcoil). 

I’ll be very interested to see what Longines says about the case. It looks like a generic jobbers case and I think the movement was married with the case and dial after it left Longines. 

Best Regards,

Mark

  • Like 1
Posted

Did Longines contract ébauches to jewelers? Twas quite common to see branded movements sent out this way. Either way don’t assume nefariousness. Worst case you probably have an ‘unbranded’ watch with a Longines movement.

  • Like 1
Posted

Oh, I see ... I'll just have to wait for the answer from Longines, and I will tell you.

When disassembling the watch, I noticed some figures on the back of the dial. I don't know whether they mean anything.

Thanks to all of you!

Longines 2517-4.jpg

Posted
5 hours ago, Mercurial said:

’ll be very interested to see what Longines says about the case. It looks like a generic jobbers case

The format of the numbers on the case back are similar to Longines I have - a two digit and a four digit number. 

4 hours ago, rehajm said:

Did Longines contract ébauches to jewelers? Twas quite common to see branded movements sent out this way. Either way don’t assume nefariousness. Worst case you probably have an ‘unbranded’ watch with a Longines movement.

The lack of "Longines" on the dial suggests this might be the case. But then you would expect the jeweller to put their name on. 

We await the response from Longines. 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I've never seen them, then again, I haven't got a ton of experience, but "common"? Really? In what context have you seen them? I'm not questioning you. I am sincerely curious why I've missed it. An alternative to Fixodrop is to apply less oil (no more than 50 % of the circle area). The only downside would be that it would shorten the service interval. More oil will prolong the service interval, but if the movement is subjected to trauma, there's a risk it will be displaced. Fixodrop makes it more stable. Unfortunately, Fixodrop is seriously expensive.
    • I plan to continue this thread until done. I received the watch today.  My first step was to make measurements.  Here they are. Here is an image of this model watch retrieved from ebay   Here is my sketch of the bezel profile that I need to make.  No dimensions yet as I am pondering that.   Question: Should the bezel grip the crystal?  The crystal is already gripping a lip of the case.
    • I'm in the middle of restoring a 1980 Bulova 666 (Devil Diver) and am trying to confirm how to handle the bezel. (see pics) It was quite dirty and grimy (didn't rotate) but after cleaning and soaking a bit, it started turning and I managed to pull the bezel off the case. There is no click spring nor retention ring, only a worn out o-ring inside the bezel.  I am concluding that the o-ring is there as a tension ring to hold the bezel in place(?), as the bezel sits outside the crystal, so I know it's not for waterproofing. Can someone confirm: 1) Did some Bulova/Accutrons from this era have these types of free-rotating bezels with only a rubber o-ring to help keep the bezel attached? 2) Is it as simple as matching the o-ring, applying a bit of silicon grease and just pressing the ring back on? 3) Wouldn't see very sturdy. Is there anything else needed to reduce the chance of the bezel coming off (other than glue) I've handled "normal" bezels in years past with click springs and metal wire to retain the bezel, but servicing one with only an o-ring is new to me.  I would appreciate any feedback/experience from others. Much appreciated.    
    • Hi folks, I'm doing some homework on getting a watchmaker's lathe, and it's clear I have a lot to learn. But I know one goal: I want to be able to fabricate wheels, which would require an indexing capability. I know how to use large lathes- like, giant metal lathes- but my experience is a few decades old now (but you never forget the smell of the metal cutting oil). So I'm looking to learn anew, and have a goal to get to a point where I can fabricate some basic watch parts. I also have no specific timeframe and want to do this right, so I'll be patient and learn what I need to before spending the money. I know I'm not going to get anything for a pittance, but I'm also not really able to put together the scratch for a $5-$10k lathe. What's out there for a hobbyist that can either handle some fabrication out of the box or can be relatively easily made to do so? Thanks!  
×
×
  • Create New...