Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I have been recently servicing an Omega 3220A chronograph movement which uses a Dubois Depraz 2000 chrono module.  This has been quite a time consuming project, not necessarily difficult but with lots of steps.  Working on the chrono module is like working on the love child of a hugely complex keyless works and a Timex pin pallet movement. I do have access to a couple of Omega tech sheets and a couple of relevant Youtube videos (including Mark Lovick's Breitling series) so I feel confident that I have all of the required information.

The 'tractor' movement (effectively an ETA 2892) had no issues with obtaining 300 degree amplitude dial up / dial down and maybe a spread of 7 seconds across all of the positions.  I serviced the chrono module and when reinstalling it, this brought the amplitude down to about 260 degress with the chrono stopped and 200 with it running.  The Omega specification states that the chrono running should see the amplitude drop by no more than 40 degrees (from, I am guessing, the assembled amplitude i.e. chrono stopped rather than just the bare tractor movement).

Obviously this isn't good enough. I am going to have to redo the chrono module again.  Where I suspect I have a problem is inconsistent / over oiling of pivots.  For some reason the Omega technical guide states to apply oil to the bottom pivot of each wheel and then place in the jeweled base plate.  In practice, I managed to smear oil on the horizontal base of the wheel which would be smeared over the outside face of the jewel.  This also wouldn't be helped by dragging the wheel around trying to get the lower pivots to engage in the the jewel.  When I watch Mark service a similar Breitling chrono with DD module, he also oils the bottom pivots and installs the wheels (obviously doing a better job than me!). 

My question is, why can't I install the wheels dry and the oil the jewel on the other side of the base plate in the conventional way? The top pivots are oiled through the jewels in the conventional way, so why would the lower pivots be any different? Looking at the those jewels (picture below an example from a different movement) it looks like there isn't an oil well in the outside surface of the jewel around the pivot, so perhaps I would be better applying a drop of oil directly to the jewel hole before installing the wheel?  Perhaps the jewels have different arrangement to conventional jewels because the outside face is installed against the dial side of the tractor movement and we don't want to risk oil migrating from the module to the movement.

There are also a couple of friction springs that may have an impact on amplitude, I will recheck their pre-load but these should be OK.  Is there anything else I should look at as a source of friction in the DD module?

IMG_8922.thumb.JPG.944d23a192ec5bd6137c2cc974a9d7e3.JPG

Capture2.JPG.dc84f9f644364448ae7d3454dd3774b3.JPG

image.thumb.png.81d63d178d455ce0d7c02aad3b480c4a.png

Posted
  On 4/16/2025 at 4:37 AM, Simeon said:

For some reason the Omega technical guide states to apply oil to the bottom pivot of each wheel and then place in the jeweled base plate.

Expand  

a unfortunate problem of watchmakers is watch companies not explaining why they do things.

the practice of oiling the pivots is not unique to all watches. I've seen it on Seiko watches for instance a lot of the quartz watches you'll do that because you can't see the pivot on the other side there is no oil sink. Or some other watches they actually use grease rather than a oil and they do say that the grease won't flow if you oil in the jewel you have to put it on the pivot

the other reason for all of this may be that if you look at the side view this is really thin module and the one side presses against the other watch movement and if you were to put oil in oil sinks they may be concerned that the oil is going to run down into the other module. So they may only want the oil sparingly placed on the pivots and not flooding all over the universe but that's a speculation

 

 

  • Thanks 1

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • By the way, I opened my watch, looked under a magnifying glass, there is simply no grease, the screws are without traces, the slots are intact.I think it's just a matter of maintenance.there are no rotor marks on the body. And to remove the strap from yours, just press on the 1st side,and slightly move the strap, then on the other side and it will come off.
    • Hi My name is Chris. Just started trying to learn about watch and clock repair as a result of repairing my fathers old 1890s police station clock (about a year ago). The clock was Ok, but having graduated to pocket watches and then wrist watches, despite the really excellent stuff on Youtube, I am struggling a bit.  As a retired engineer, I find the engineering exquisite, but a bit on the fiddly side.  I have done a few practice watches with a little success but failed a few, but have had success with Seiko 7005s, 7009s etc, but have just attempted a citizen 5430.  Nightmare.  My wife thought I had found religion as I spent so much time on my knees with my eyes to the floor looking for springs.  Got through that and found that the balance is shot.  Trying to source one or something that will fit from the citizen range has me totally perplexed.  Tried Ebay, Cousins etc without luck.  Any advice as to alternatives that will fit or alternative sources would be gratefully received.
    • Agreed, this is puzzling. Can you ask questions or inspect the lots before bidding? My Boley & Leinen Reform face plate is dia. 95mm exactly. It's possible that 4 inches is a slightly too large approximation, but why then make the distinction to 3 11/16 for the sake of 8mm? If the larger ones are truly 4" then they will clash with the bed, but then I have no idea which 8mm lathe would take them. All 8mm lathes have spindle height 50mm or less, as far as I know. The spindle height is, as you say, standard 50mm for W.W.
    • I have only been a member for six years & I have found this a very friendly forum although I don’t have anything to do with watches not because I don’t like watches but because I have gout in both hands so my dexterity isn’t very good, I restore torsion clocks & occasionally other antique clocks also at 72 my eyes are not what they used to be, that is why I only post on the clock forum & the lathe forum mostly . As others have said Mark it is much appreciated that  you are willing & able to do this. very many Thanks Dell
    • Ah, this is brilliant, thank you very much!
×
×
  • Create New...