Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

Hi friends! My mother got a bunch of old watches from a horologist who was retiring, and he subsequently passed away. It's been in her studio for years, and she showed it to me today and I just fell in love with it.

Sadly, I don't know a darn thing about it yet. It's quite old, or at least seems to be. It has two winding arbors, but the key is missing. The crystal appears to be some kind of yellowed plastic, which is odd- I think it was replaced at some point to possibly protect it or something. If I had to guess, it's from the mid-19th century, given that it has no keyless works and that it says "Anchor Escapement" in French. It looks to be about 18 ligne, and the case fob is positioned in the upper right corner.

The face is missing the dial, the hands, and a couple of the wheels that drive the hands- I think. But the movement itself seems to be in excellent shape. The serial number on the movement matches the number on the case- it's stamped on the movement and on the case in two places.

I haven't started any disassembly yet, but I'm wondering if anyone can give me some idea of what kind of movement it is, and where I might look to see what parts are missing from the face. i may even have a dial that would fit it. It's in good enough shape that I think I could get it running, assuming I could find the missing parts.

Any insights are vastly appreciated and thank you!

unknown_2_front.jpg

unknown_2_front_open.jpg

unknown_2_rear_engraving.jpg

unknown_2_rear_open_windingposts.jpg

unknown_2_open_windingposts2.jpg

unknown_2_rear_caseinterior.jpg

unknown_2_movement.jpg

Addendum: The inside of the case has some *very* tiny scratched numbers and letters in it, but I am having an extremely hard time seeing what they are. Like "N 99" and "No192X",

They were clearly done with some kind of sharp stylus and maybe they mean when it was serviced or by who?

Addendum the second: At least one of the scratches seems to say "N1921X" or maybe "W1921X". Serviced in 1921?

And the inside lid of the case has the letters R H with a star between them, and a very tiny mark that says "ARGENT" in a u-shape.

Edited by coreymsnow
Typo in subject line
  • coreymsnow changed the title to Very Old Watch- "Echappement A Ancre", "13 Rubis" on the case
Posted

The movement looks like a lepine movement in the Locle style, with a tangential lever escapement, with decorative engraving. 

Without engraving, the movement would have looked something like this :

IMG_4163.thumb.jpeg.031398dd6af2e290feccb9b8b1ca6fc4.jpeg

The blue arrow points to the click, which appears to be missing from your movement. Without a click, it will be impossible for the mainspring to retain any power when wound. 

The “Echappment A Ancre” means the watch has a lever escapement. 

There is some damage and missing parts on the dial side. The blue arrow below indicates where the cannon pinion, centre wheel arbour and the pin that runs through them has snapped off. 

The green arrows indicate where the Maltese cross style stop works should be. 
IMG_4164.thumb.jpeg.73958d1a327d259ff9dffa20df41a11f.jpeg

Best Regards,

Mark

  • Like 4
  • Thanks 2
Posted
1 hour ago, Mercurial said:

The movement looks like a lepine movement in the Locle style, with a tangential lever escapement, with decorative engraving. 

Without engraving, the movement would have looked something like this :

IMG_4163.thumb.jpeg.031398dd6af2e290feccb9b8b1ca6fc4.jpeg

The blue arrow points to the click, which appears to be missing from your movement. Without a click, it will be impossible for the mainspring to retain any power when wound. 

The “Echappment A Ancre” means the watch has a lever escapement. 

There is some damage and missing parts on the dial side. The blue arrow below indicates where the cannon pinion, centre wheel arbour and the pin that runs through them has snapped off. 

The green arrows indicate where the Maltese cross style stop works should be. 
IMG_4164.thumb.jpeg.73958d1a327d259ff9dffa20df41a11f.jpeg

Best Regards,

Mark

That's great info, thank you. I wonder if the guy who owned it, being a watchmaker, was using it as a donor- would explain the missing parts.

I'll have to see if I can find the missing parts. Be an interesting challenge.

Posted
47 minutes ago, coreymsnow said:

I wonder if the guy who owned it, being a watchmaker, was using it as a donor- would explain the missing parts.

Parts weren’t readily interchangeable when this watch was made, and almost every part was adjusted by hand to fit the rest of the parts in that specific watch.

That said, it can save time to harvest a part from a donor movement so you can modify it to fit a similar movement, rather than try to make the part from scratch. 

With that in mind, it is possible that the click from this watch was removed for use in another watch.

I doubt that the other missing parts were taken for use as donor parts. The cannon pinion would be removed properly, rather than snapping it off with the centre wheel arbour and pin inside it. 

The Maltese cross stop works were probably removed by a lazy or less knowledgeable watchmaker servicing the watch. 

It is very common to encounter otherwise functional watches (including very high end pieces) that are missing their stop work because a previous watchmaker didn’t know how to set it up when reassembling the movement, or was too lazy to bother and knew that the customer would probably never notice. 

It is possible that the stop work parts were taken to be fitted to a watch that was missing them. 

Best Regards,

Mark

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I will definitely look for interference when I open it back up. You make good points.  The part that makes me wonder is the fact that it snaps around well if I do it during the day whilst I'm wear it and assume it has more 'wind' than at midnight. 
    • I doubt it is due to lack of amplitude.  My 7750 - which I haven't serviced yet because the numbers were OK (and I am still scared of chronographs!)- has no problem flipping the date with an amplitude closer to 250º On other movements I have had issues where the plate(s) that go over the calendar wheel interfere.  I did an FHF ST 96-4 last week where there are 2 tiny plates plus a larger plate that hold the calendar wheel in place and I had real problems getting the calendar wheel to snap around nicely.  Lubrication on the points of the teeth of the calendar wheel and making sure the small plates were aligned properly was the solution there.
    • Well I spoke too soon. Here's where I am now with this issue. I replaced the date jumper and all seemed to function correctly. Fully wound and only in the movement holder, no dial or hands, I let it sit untouched for two days. Both nights it advanced the date. The second night it might have been just shy of fully advanced. Seemed as though I fixed it, so I reassembled the watch. Three nights in a row the date did not advance. Once I pull the crown it does. So you might think that it's the dial interfering, but here's the weird thing. If I advance the date during the day to 11:57p and watch it get to 12:00:30a the date flips with gusto. So here's what I'm thinking and could use your council. I installed a new Swiss mainspring. I used Moebius 8217 braking grease on the barrel walls. It seems to wind quite a bit before slipping, but does slip.  I've read that the 7750 really needs Kluber p125 as a braking grease.  Do you think it just doesn't have enough power after a few to several hours of sitting before the date change? Here are the TG numbers after service:  Rate +1s/d,    Amp 301,    BE 0.0ms   
    • I've managed with the ones I have but 1.8 mm would be better. 
    • Parts weren’t readily interchangeable when this watch was made, and almost every part was adjusted by hand to fit the rest of the parts in that specific watch. That said, it can save time to harvest a part from a donor movement so you can modify it to fit a similar movement, rather than try to make the part from scratch.  With that in mind, it is possible that the click from this watch was removed for use in another watch. I doubt that the other missing parts were taken for use as donor parts. The cannon pinion would be removed properly, rather than snapping it off with the centre wheel arbour and pin inside it.  The Maltese cross stop works were probably removed by a lazy or less knowledgeable watchmaker servicing the watch.  It is very common to encounter otherwise functional watches (including very high end pieces) that are missing their stop work because a previous watchmaker didn’t know how to set it up when reassembling the movement, or was too lazy to bother and knew that the customer would probably never notice.  It is possible that the stop work parts were taken to be fitted to a watch that was missing them.  Best Regards, Mark
×
×
  • Create New...