Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

Hi friends! My mother got a bunch of old watches from a horologist who was retiring, and he subsequently passed away. It's been in her studio for years, and she showed it to me today and I just fell in love with it.

Sadly, I don't know a darn thing about it yet. It's quite old, or at least seems to be. It has two winding arbors, but the key is missing. The crystal appears to be some kind of yellowed plastic, which is odd- I think it was replaced at some point to possibly protect it or something. If I had to guess, it's from the mid-19th century, given that it has no keyless works and that it says "Anchor Escapement" in French. It looks to be about 18 ligne, and the case fob is positioned in the upper right corner.

The face is missing the dial, the hands, and a couple of the wheels that drive the hands- I think. But the movement itself seems to be in excellent shape. The serial number on the movement matches the number on the case- it's stamped on the movement and on the case in two places.

I haven't started any disassembly yet, but I'm wondering if anyone can give me some idea of what kind of movement it is, and where I might look to see what parts are missing from the face. i may even have a dial that would fit it. It's in good enough shape that I think I could get it running, assuming I could find the missing parts.

Any insights are vastly appreciated and thank you!

unknown_2_front.jpg

unknown_2_front_open.jpg

unknown_2_rear_engraving.jpg

unknown_2_rear_open_windingposts.jpg

unknown_2_open_windingposts2.jpg

unknown_2_rear_caseinterior.jpg

unknown_2_movement.jpg

Addendum: The inside of the case has some *very* tiny scratched numbers and letters in it, but I am having an extremely hard time seeing what they are. Like "N 99" and "No192X",

They were clearly done with some kind of sharp stylus and maybe they mean when it was serviced or by who?

Addendum the second: At least one of the scratches seems to say "N1921X" or maybe "W1921X". Serviced in 1921?

And the inside lid of the case has the letters R H with a star between them, and a very tiny mark that says "ARGENT" in a u-shape.

Edited by coreymsnow
Typo in subject line
  • coreymsnow changed the title to Very Old Watch- "Echappement A Ancre", "13 Rubis" on the case
Posted

The movement looks like a lepine movement in the Locle style, with a tangential lever escapement, with decorative engraving. 

Without engraving, the movement would have looked something like this :

IMG_4163.thumb.jpeg.031398dd6af2e290feccb9b8b1ca6fc4.jpeg

The blue arrow points to the click, which appears to be missing from your movement. Without a click, it will be impossible for the mainspring to retain any power when wound. 

The “Echappment A Ancre” means the watch has a lever escapement. 

There is some damage and missing parts on the dial side. The blue arrow below indicates where the cannon pinion, centre wheel arbour and the pin that runs through them has snapped off. 

The green arrows indicate where the Maltese cross style stop works should be. 
IMG_4164.thumb.jpeg.73958d1a327d259ff9dffa20df41a11f.jpeg

Best Regards,

Mark

  • Like 4
  • Thanks 2
Posted
1 hour ago, Mercurial said:

The movement looks like a lepine movement in the Locle style, with a tangential lever escapement, with decorative engraving. 

Without engraving, the movement would have looked something like this :

IMG_4163.thumb.jpeg.031398dd6af2e290feccb9b8b1ca6fc4.jpeg

The blue arrow points to the click, which appears to be missing from your movement. Without a click, it will be impossible for the mainspring to retain any power when wound. 

The “Echappment A Ancre” means the watch has a lever escapement. 

There is some damage and missing parts on the dial side. The blue arrow below indicates where the cannon pinion, centre wheel arbour and the pin that runs through them has snapped off. 

The green arrows indicate where the Maltese cross style stop works should be. 
IMG_4164.thumb.jpeg.73958d1a327d259ff9dffa20df41a11f.jpeg

Best Regards,

Mark

That's great info, thank you. I wonder if the guy who owned it, being a watchmaker, was using it as a donor- would explain the missing parts.

I'll have to see if I can find the missing parts. Be an interesting challenge.

Posted
47 minutes ago, coreymsnow said:

I wonder if the guy who owned it, being a watchmaker, was using it as a donor- would explain the missing parts.

Parts weren’t readily interchangeable when this watch was made, and almost every part was adjusted by hand to fit the rest of the parts in that specific watch.

That said, it can save time to harvest a part from a donor movement so you can modify it to fit a similar movement, rather than try to make the part from scratch. 

With that in mind, it is possible that the click from this watch was removed for use in another watch.

I doubt that the other missing parts were taken for use as donor parts. The cannon pinion would be removed properly, rather than snapping it off with the centre wheel arbour and pin inside it. 

The Maltese cross stop works were probably removed by a lazy or less knowledgeable watchmaker servicing the watch. 

It is very common to encounter otherwise functional watches (including very high end pieces) that are missing their stop work because a previous watchmaker didn’t know how to set it up when reassembling the movement, or was too lazy to bother and knew that the customer would probably never notice. 

It is possible that the stop work parts were taken to be fitted to a watch that was missing them. 

Best Regards,

Mark

  • Thanks 1
Posted (edited)
3 hours ago, Mercurial said:

Parts weren’t readily interchangeable when this watch was made, and almost every part was adjusted by hand to fit the rest of the parts in that specific watch.

That said, it can save time to harvest a part from a donor movement so you can modify it to fit a similar movement, rather than try to make the part from scratch. 

With that in mind, it is possible that the click from this watch was removed for use in another watch.

I doubt that the other missing parts were taken for use as donor parts. The cannon pinion would be removed properly, rather than snapping it off with the centre wheel arbour and pin inside it. 

The Maltese cross stop works were probably removed by a lazy or less knowledgeable watchmaker servicing the watch. 

It is very common to encounter otherwise functional watches (including very high end pieces) that are missing their stop work because a previous watchmaker didn’t know how to set it up when reassembling the movement, or was too lazy to bother and knew that the customer would probably never notice. 

It is possible that the stop work parts were taken to be fitted to a watch that was missing them. 

Best Regards,

Mark

I was sort of expecting to find that parts would be difficult to source- my research bears out the lack of complete interchangeability.

I'm less concerned about the stop works because the watch could run without it, but it would be nice to have it. I have a gorgeous dial that would be perfect for this watch and the movement is just gorgeous to my eyes. I hate to see it not working.

I'm not sure where to start to find similar parts, but I expect learning to fabricate a cannon pinion and center wheel would be even harder. But who knows, it's not like it's going anywhere.

Thank you again!

Edited by coreymsnow

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I've never seen them, then again, I haven't got a ton of experience, but "common"? Really? In what context have you seen them? I'm not questioning you. I am sincerely curious why I've missed it. An alternative to Fixodrop is to apply less oil (no more than 50 % of the circle area). The only downside would be that it would shorten the service interval. More oil will prolong the service interval, but if the movement is subjected to trauma, there's a risk it will be displaced. Fixodrop makes it more stable. Unfortunately, Fixodrop is seriously expensive.
    • I plan to continue this thread until done. I received the watch today.  My first step was to make measurements.  Here they are. Here is an image of this model watch retrieved from ebay   Here is my sketch of the bezel profile that I need to make.  No dimensions yet as I am pondering that.   Question: Should the bezel grip the crystal?  The crystal is already gripping a lip of the case.
    • I'm in the middle of restoring a 1980 Bulova 666 (Devil Diver) and am trying to confirm how to handle the bezel. (see pics) It was quite dirty and grimy (didn't rotate) but after cleaning and soaking a bit, it started turning and I managed to pull the bezel off the case. There is no click spring nor retention ring, only a worn out o-ring inside the bezel.  I am concluding that the o-ring is there as a tension ring to hold the bezel in place(?), as the bezel sits outside the crystal, so I know it's not for waterproofing. Can someone confirm: 1) Did some Bulova/Accutrons from this era have these types of free-rotating bezels with only a rubber o-ring to help keep the bezel attached? 2) Is it as simple as matching the o-ring, applying a bit of silicon grease and just pressing the ring back on? 3) Wouldn't see very sturdy. Is there anything else needed to reduce the chance of the bezel coming off (other than glue) I've handled "normal" bezels in years past with click springs and metal wire to retain the bezel, but servicing one with only an o-ring is new to me.  I would appreciate any feedback/experience from others. Much appreciated.    
    • Hi folks, I'm doing some homework on getting a watchmaker's lathe, and it's clear I have a lot to learn. But I know one goal: I want to be able to fabricate wheels, which would require an indexing capability. I know how to use large lathes- like, giant metal lathes- but my experience is a few decades old now (but you never forget the smell of the metal cutting oil). So I'm looking to learn anew, and have a goal to get to a point where I can fabricate some basic watch parts. I also have no specific timeframe and want to do this right, so I'll be patient and learn what I need to before spending the money. I know I'm not going to get anything for a pittance, but I'm also not really able to put together the scratch for a $5-$10k lathe. What's out there for a hobbyist that can either handle some fabrication out of the box or can be relatively easily made to do so? Thanks!  
×
×
  • Create New...