Jump to content

Website Software Upgrade

Mark

By Mark
in WRT News & Announcements

 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 62
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

Mark
Mark

OK - I have finished the upgrade and await any reports of problems. Thank you @jdm for pointing out some issues, hopefully I have dealt with those. If there is anything else guys, please let

Mark
Mark

The makers of the software this website runs on has released several new versions since we last upgraded, one of which was a major new release. We are currently on v3 of IP Board and the new version h

GuiBer
GuiBer

Everything will run as smoothly as a complete watch overhaul in your hands!...   and this spectacular forum will be even better... and up-to-date!!   Thanks for all the knowledge you managed to tr

Posted Images

Mark Distinguished Member

Mark

Posted
  • Author
Posted
Via tapatalk.....

When I go back and edit a post, I now get blank lines inserted between lines of text.

I believe this is a Tapatalk issue. The developers of Tapatalk have not yet allowed for the fact that IPB is not using BBCode any more and is storing the posts with HTML formatting. It is something a lot of Tapatalk users are complaining about.

We'll have to wait for Tapatalk to catch up.

jdm Distinguished Member

jdm

Posted
Posted
7 minutes ago, Mark said:

Strange one. I can't replicate the error. Quoting came up perfect. Tried several posts.

If you have non-posted content in the editing window, sometime hitting "quote" doesn't add, or replace it. But if you clear the content, it works fine. Something to do with CKedit handling temporay content.

The feature of partial quoting by selecting text then hitting the notification pop-up is nice.

Davey57 WRT Addict

Davey57

Posted
Posted

I have had no problems logging in to the site since the change but, tonight I kept getting an error message.

I have had to enable an exception in order to allow me to login and access the site. I am using Firefox, version 45.0.1. I don't think there have been any recent updates installed by Firefox on my pc.

It might be something or nothing, I just thought I would advise you on what happened tonight.

Here is the message that appeared.

www.watchrepairtalk.com uses an invalid security certificate. The certificate is not trusted because the issuer certificate is unknown. The server might not be sending the appropriate intermediate certificates. An additional root certificate may need to be imported. Error code: SEC_ERROR_UNKNOWN_ISSUER

oldhippy Distinguished Member

oldhippy

Posted
Posted
On 25/03/2016 at 8:46 AM, Spandrel said:

This method will disable all notofications for all sites, so be aware of that.

In the Firefox address bar type "about:config" without the parentheses then press "enter". You may be presented with a dire warning of the world ending or some such like. Press "OK I'll don full protective headgear" or whatever and press "enter".

In the search box type "dom.web" and find the line "dom.webnotifications.enabled". Double click on it and the "true" will turn to "false". Restart your browser and the nags have ceased.

Mark posted the above just before me and his solution seems the better option as it disables notifications only for this site.

Thanks again Mark.

I have had the same problem and I also use firefox.

Mark Distinguished Member

Mark

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Nothing to do with the software upgrade.

I installed a new server SSL certificate last night - it's most likely related to that.

Works fine in my Chrome browser and also Safari.

Now I have to download Firefox to text :(

The things I do for you guys. Lol

:)

Mark Distinguished Member

Mark

Posted
  • Author
Posted

OK Guys,

I think I have resolved this - I had the wrong intermediate certificate installed. I have replaced this and done some other tweaks.

I had a third party testing website check it out and the following browser/OS combinations show good results apart from IE6 and IE8 on WinXP. But this site won't work on those browsers anyway me thinks - they are too old.

 

Android 2.3.7   No SNI 2RSA 2048 (SHA256)  TLS 1.0TLS_RSA_WITH_RC4_128_SHA  No FS  RC4

Android 4.0.4RSA 2048 (SHA256)  TLS 1.0TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA   ECDH secp256r1  FS

Android 4.1.1RSA 2048 (SHA256)  TLS 1.0TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA   ECDH secp521r1  FS

Android 4.2.2RSA 2048 (SHA256)  TLS 1.0TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA   ECDH secp521r1  FS

Android 4.3RSA 2048 (SHA256)  TLS 1.0TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA   ECDH secp521r1  FS

Android 4.4.2RSA 2048 (SHA256)  TLS 1.2TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384   ECDH secp521r1  FS

Android 5.0.0RSA 2048 (SHA256)  TLS 1.2TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA   ECDH secp521r1  FS

Baidu Jan 2015RSA 2048 (SHA256)  TLS 1.0TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA   ECDH secp256r1  FS

BingPreview Jan 2015RSA 2048 (SHA256)  TLS 1.2TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384   ECDH secp521r1  FS

Chrome 48 / OS X  RRSA 2048 (SHA256)  TLS 1.2TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256   ECDH secp256r1  FS

Firefox 31.3.0 ESR / Win 7RSA 2048 (SHA256)  TLS 1.2TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256   ECDH secp256r1  FS

Firefox 42 / OS X  RRSA 2048 (SHA256)  TLS 1.2TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256   ECDH secp256r1  FS

Firefox 44 / OS X  RRSA 2048 (SHA256)  TLS 1.2TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256   ECDH secp256r1  FS

Googlebot Feb 2015RSA 2048 (SHA256)  TLS 1.2TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256   ECDH secp521r1  FS

IE 6 / XP   No FS 1   No SNI 2Server closed connection

IE 7 / VistaRSA 2048 (SHA256)  TLS 1.0TLS_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA  No FS

IE 8 / XP   No FS 1   No SNI 2RSA 2048 (SHA256)  TLS 1.0TLS_RSA_WITH_RC4_128_SHA  RC4

IE 8-10 / Win 7  RRSA 2048 (SHA256)  TLS 1.0TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA   ECDH secp256r1  FS

IE 11 / Win 7  RRSA 2048 (SHA256)  TLS 1.2TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384   ECDH secp256r1  FS

IE 11 / Win 8.1  RRSA 2048 (SHA256)  TLS 1.2TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384   ECDH secp256r1  FS

IE 10 / Win Phone 8.0RSA 2048 (SHA256)  TLS 1.0TLS_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA  No FS

IE 11 / Win Phone 8.1  RRSA 2048 (SHA256)  TLS 1.2TLS_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256  No FS

IE 11 / Win Phone 8.1 Update  RRSA 2048 (SHA256)  TLS 1.2TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384   ECDH secp256r1  FS

IE 11 / Win 10  RRSA 2048 (SHA256)  TLS 1.2TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384   ECDH secp256r1  FS

Edge 13 / Win 10  RRSA 2048 (SHA256)  TLS 1.2TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384   ECDH secp256r1  FS

Edge 13 / Win Phone 10  RRSA 2048 (SHA256)  TLS 1.2TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384   ECDH secp256r1  FS

Java 6u45   No SNI 2RSA 2048 (SHA256)  TLS 1.0TLS_RSA_WITH_RC4_128_SHA  No FS  RC4

Java 7u25RSA 2048 (SHA256)  TLS 1.0TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA   ECDH secp256r1  FS

Java 8u31RSA 2048 (SHA256)  TLS 1.2TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256   ECDH secp256r1  FS

OpenSSL 0.9.8yRSA 2048 (SHA256)  TLS 1.0TLS_DHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA   DH 2048  FS

OpenSSL 1.0.1l  RRSA 2048 (SHA256)  TLS 1.2TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384   ECDH secp521r1  FS

OpenSSL 1.0.2e  RRSA 2048 (SHA256)  TLS 1.2TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384   ECDH secp256r1  FS

Safari 5.1.9 / OS X 10.6.8RSA 2048 (SHA256)  TLS 1.0TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA   ECDH secp256r1  FS

Safari 6 / iOS 6.0.1  RRSA 2048 (SHA256)  TLS 1.2TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384   ECDH secp256r1  FS

Safari 6.0.4 / OS X 10.8.4  RRSA 2048 (SHA256)  TLS 1.0TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA   ECDH secp256r1  FS

Safari 7 / iOS 7.1  RRSA 2048 (SHA256)  TLS 1.2TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384   ECDH secp256r1  FS

Safari 7 / OS X 10.9  RRSA 2048 (SHA256)  TLS 1.2TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384   ECDH secp256r1  FS

Safari 8 / iOS 8.4  RRSA 2048 (SHA256)  TLS 1.2TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384   ECDH secp256r1  FS

Safari 8 / OS X 10.10  RRSA 2048 (SHA256)  TLS 1.2TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384   ECDH secp256r1  FS

Safari 9 / iOS 9  RRSA 2048 (SHA256)  TLS 1.2TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384   ECDH secp256r1  FS

Safari 9 / OS X 10.11  RRSA 2048 (SHA256)  TLS 1.2TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384   ECDH secp256r1  FS

Apple ATS 9 / iOS 9  RRSA 2048 (SHA256)  TLS 1.2TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384   ECDH secp256r1  FS

Yahoo Slurp Jan 2015RSA 2048 (SHA256)  TLS 1.2TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384   ECDH secp384r1  FS

YandexBot Jan 2015RSA 2048 (SHA256)  TLS 1.2TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384   ECDH secp521r1  FS

jdm Distinguished Member

jdm

Posted
Posted

Could the dirty words check be relaxed a little? "Coarze" (with an s) is a normal word very used in the industry. There are probably many othe false triggers

  • Like 1
  • 2 weeks later...
jdm Distinguished Member

jdm

Posted
Posted

The server now presents the mobile interface when accessing from my usual desktop. Why that could be?

Mark Distinguished Member

Mark

Posted
  • Author
Posted
The server now presents the mobile interface when accessing from my usual desktop. Why that could be?

This website is now responsive. That means it will present itself differently depending on the size of the window. If your browser window is below a certain size then it will present as a tablet or mobile website.

Maximise your browser window to full screen and refresh.

I'm going to close this thread as the software upgrade happened quite a while back :)

If you are still having problems please feel free to start a new thread or open a support ticket using the "support" link in the main menu above.

:)

  • Like 2
  • Mark locked this topic
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • mbwatch
      Automatic vs Manual movement servicing

      By mbwatch · Posted

      If at all possible, find a service guide for the automatic movements your work on, because the lubrication procedures may have different requirements or rely on oils you would not use in a manual wind train (in addition to the braking grease you mentioned). Some autos like older Seikos do not have a manual wind option, so the procedure of letting down the mainspring without being able to use the crown may require a screwdriver in the ratchet wheel screw and great care. Do you have an auto movement you were planning to start with?
    • LittleWatchShop
      Breitling Navitimer 806

      By LittleWatchShop · Posted

      I am an amateur, so there's that. I do not get fixated on amplitude, lift angles, and beat error. However, 4.8ms would bug me if it were my watch. But you must judge your own skills to appreciate the possibility of going backward. I suggest, that you button it up let your friend enjoy the watch for now. As your skills progress, come back to it and correct it. I assume that this watch has a fixed hairspring pin. Some modern watches have an adjustable pin along with adjustable regulator. These are trivial to get in beat. I own a valjoux 726 my dad gave me on my 18th birthday (a looooong time ago). I broke the ratchet wheel with an aggressive wind 4 yrs ago. I have been waiting for my skills to progress before doing a service. I am close. Your advice is well placed and I will apply it.
    • tonydagee
      Unitas 6376

      By tonydagee · Posted

      I didn’t find any anomaly to the left of the red mark…reflection? this is the balance in its pivot in the inverted assembly. i can’t see any obvious kinks  and the spring is flat as far as I can see. Either the stud screw is missing, or it’s glued in… I don’t know. I’m loathe to fiddle with it. Any further insights? Thanks!
    • Bonefixer
      Breitling Navitimer 806

      By Bonefixer · Posted

      Update!  I've dismantled it, cleaned all the glue off, and rebuilt and lubricated the base movement. I'll leave the chrono part for another day. It's running well - great amplitude and keeping time, but it's got a beat error of 4.8ms.    How important is it to correct this? I'm worried that the potential for making things worse having to take the hairspring off and on repeatedly to adjust this. Would anyone here accept it at that?
    • Neverenoughwatches
      Discussing the forum in the event of no administration

      By Neverenoughwatches · Posted

      Since I've been banned from the previous discussion, apparently my language was inappropriate...for small boys. I will start another thread and act in a more decent manner for the girls and ladies of the group.  Please what will happen if the forum can't be managed by the administrator, are there provisions in place to preserve the achived member's questions and answers over the years. Please if I may ask these important questions that are important to the members please.
×
×
  • Create New...