Jump to content

Vintage Quartz watches


Recommended Posts

I have a variety of older quartz watches that appear to have obsolete movements. Being new to this, can I ask, is it possible to measure a quartz movement and find an alternative? If so, how do I go about matching the original movement?   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi buzz,

Welcome to the forum.

To answer your question, it is possible to find the "next" movement to the obsolete one or in other words the current substitute by the same company. It is a little difficult to figure it out but if you post the movement(s) you are talking about I'm sure there will be someone who knows the alternative.

Sometimes there is no substitute or an equivalent is not from the original company or even the same country. An example, and it is not the same situation, I've seen Miyotas 8200 type movement substituting ETA 2824 type movements...Also some quartz from ETA may be substituted by cheaper Rondas and so forth. The trick is to have the approximate same dimensions and the height to the stem and dial to match the case.

I'm sure some one that has more experience in this than me will soon chip in.

Cheers,

Bob

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sometimes i has been able to find movements on Ebay. Or just servicing the old movement could make it run again? Some old Citizen movement has newer movements that would interchange with the old ones. So all depends on what movement it is? Ronda does a whole lot of movements that could work for older movements. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

One is a Geneva quartz, movement is Longain Ltd LG08

and the other is a Vialli PH7799 but the movement only has Miyota

Neither are anything special, but I like them. I'll take a look at the Ronda movements and see what I find.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cheers Bob. Think I found a Miyota movement if the height is right. What exactly does the height measurement refer to - just the thickness of the movement (without stem?)

Struggling with the round one though, 18.3 dia. Any ideas where I need to be for this one?

DSCF2149[1].JPG

DSCF2148[1].JPG

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've converted a few quartz. With the 18.3 You can easily get away with a smaller diameter movement with a suitable dial spacer. Thickness is more an issue so find one to match. If it has date calendar then you will need the same diameter or very close. Head height measure the thickness of movement to the base of the hour wheel. Then thickness of movement to the top of the hour wheel and that will give you the head height. If the dial feet don't fit the new movement, cut them off, smooth with a fine file and fit dial to movement with dial stickers. If the substitute movement has a taller head height to fit the hour hand on, you may still get away with it, using a high dome crystal.

Tony

Sent from my SM-G900F using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Possibly I should of been more clear. The height measurements is the base of the hour wheel to the top. My hands are not steady so I tend to leave on movement to take measurement to be more accurate.

Also if the watch has any value an original or updated version of the movement is the only way to go.

Most vintage quartz watches have no value. Personally I love them.

Sent from my SM-G900F using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Gotcha... very helpful. So, if height is the key bit, what's the best way to find a match? By that, I mean do different makers tend do different heights or is it a case of any brand will probably do... take your pick? The watches in question are not of any value... I just like them.  I do have some that might have value, but I'm cutting my teeth on the cheapies, first. Personally, I prefer mechanical, but I wear what I like, and if it's quartz... well who cares... I'm happy with this one,

DSCF2150.JPG

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi buzz,

Yes, the height is mainly the thickness of the movement. Pretend the quartz movement is a waffle and the hour wheel is the little butter some restaurants put on top: The thickness is the waffle without the butter. Some distributors call "total height" and measure from the bottom of the waffle to the top of the butter which is a different measurement. I've found both measurements help since some movements are made with a taller "butter" therefore their thickness is the same but the total height differ among them.

Then, manufacturers make different heights (either one) because of case design. Some cases offer less space for the movement than others...just a matter of design and manufacturing...and even marketing I suppose.

In the Miyota case, I would check also the diameter of the movement just in case there is still something similar. Check for a familiar resemblance on your supplier's database (they post pictures) but the most important is the height. As digginstony said, the height is the important one, the shape can always be "filled up" to meet your requirements with an adapter or something. Also, by getting the same manufacturer's movement (from the old one) you are playing safe (although not always) to ensure the dial will fit the replacement (newer) movement. One word of caution: check the hands hole size. Those should match the specs of the new movement (one more reason to look the newer stuff from the SAME manufacturer as the old one) otherwise you will have to get newer hands and some Miyotas are difficult to get.

Bottom line, the more similarities of the new movement with the old, the less you will have to "improvise".

I hope it helps,

Cheers,

Bob

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Bending the balance bridge does seem to be an acceptable method as is taught in school and after all the Swiss make a nifty tool. But? Something was bothering me this discussion has gone on for five pages for one watch? One of the things we have to be very careful about when teaching watch repair on a discussion group is our observations of what's going on is based on the posting person making observations. The problem is if the person making observations does not actually grasp 100% what's going on will we become the idiots? so for instance bending the balance bridge why would we do that? Typically if it's been bent by somebody else and were restoring it back to wherever it's supposed to be. Or basically the Swiss are using it to fine tune the end shake. But it appears to be if I'm reading correctly we have a variation of 0.5 mm which is not a minor amount of end shake. this is where when you read five pages of discussion it becomes kind of a confusing mess so I would not recommend bending the balance bridge until we figure out exactly what's going on. So while I'm not a big fan of shimming which is extremely popular with @Nucejoe I do think it's perfectly acceptable until we actually figure out what's going on.
    • ? I don't know what you mean holds the arms ? The internal spring in the spindle should allow it to hold up to the rivet and the hub of the staff. But that means taking off both the collet and the rolle. With a figure of 8 calipers that have the correct nibs fitted you don't need to do that to true a balance wheel. 
    • Hi Richard I get it from master finish.co.uk email *****@*****.tld contact is Nia but sometimes they have no stock so a bit of a wait but it’s not cheap £15 per tin last time but I did buy six so may be more. Dell why does the site hide email address but it is sales at masterfinish co uk
    • I have been recently servicing an Omega 3220A chronograph movement which uses a Dubois Depraz 2000 chrono module.  This has been quite a time consuming project, not necessarily difficult but with lots of steps.  Working on the chrono module is like working on the love child of a hugely complex keyless works and a Timex pin pallet movement. I do have access to a couple of Omega tech sheets and a couple of relevant Youtube videos (including Mark Lovick's Breitling series) so I feel confident that I have all of the required information. The 'tractor' movement (effectively an ETA 2892) had no issues with obtaining 300 degree amplitude dial up / dial down and maybe a spread of 7 seconds across all of the positions.  I serviced the chrono module and when reinstalling it, this brought the amplitude down to about 260 degress with the chrono stopped and 200 with it running.  The Omega specification states that the chrono running should see the amplitude drop by no more than 40 degrees (from, I am guessing, the assembled amplitude i.e. chrono stopped rather than just the bare tractor movement). Obviously this isn't good enough. I am going to have to redo the chrono module again.  Where I suspect I have a problem is inconsistent / over oiling of pivots.  For some reason the Omega technical guide states to apply oil to the bottom pivot of each wheel and then place in the jeweled base plate.  In practice, I managed to smear oil on the horizontal base of the wheel which would be smeared over the outside face of the jewel.  This also wouldn't be helped by dragging the wheel around trying to get the lower pivots to engage in the the jewel.  When I watch Mark service a similar Breitling chrono with DD module, he also oils the bottom pivots and installs the wheels (obviously doing a better job than me!).  My question is, why can't I install the wheels dry and the oil the jewel on the other side of the base plate in the conventional way? The top pivots are oiled through the jewels in the conventional way, so why would the lower pivots be any different? Looking at the those jewels (picture below an example from a different movement) it looks like there isn't an oil well in the outside surface of the jewel around the pivot, so perhaps I would be better applying a drop of oil directly to the jewel hole before installing the wheel?  Perhaps the jewels have different arrangement to conventional jewels because the outside face is installed against the dial side of the tractor movement and we don't want to risk oil migrating from the module to the movement. There are also a couple of friction springs that may have an impact on amplitude, I will recheck their pre-load but these should be OK.  Is there anything else I should look at as a source of friction in the DD module?
    • I found a Trupoise in a flea market box of tools (🇬🇧car boot). I preferred the ‘8’ style tool until the moment I broke my new Omega rivet. The trupoise holds the arms firmly and I’ve become quite efficient… …and I just resorted to bending a balance cock. I needed a tiny bit less shake and it seemed the least risky of the other options. I held it between a stump and a fat stake while I bent the jewel end with my fingers. Honestly I don’t know how anyone would know by visual inspection. 
×
×
  • Create New...