-
Similar Content
-
Recently Browsing
- No registered users viewing this page.
-
Topics
-
Posts
-
By Neverenoughwatches · Posted
The run-out is on my mind, but very unlikely a spec would be available for such a cheap thing. I'm going completely by eye, x40 magnification is the highest I have, that I can get it under. I can't detect any run-out at all on the slowest speed, which is where it's most visible, i had thoughts of cutting the spindle tight back to the bearing, but as it was so good with the 8mm length I decided against it. At the moment it's just a play thing, but this might have an application yet. The good bit is the chance for someone to experience a little lathe work for practically nothing. The motors are 33p, the speed controller 50p and if you have a spare 5v usb adapter plug, another potentiometer as a usb plug-in power supply £1.60p or an old 6v plug in transformer as the motors are 6v rated...8,000 rpm. Who remembers whizzing their Scalextrics cars through figures of 8 under mum and dad's dining room table at xmas 👋. -
It would appear this is the shape of things to come as Mark either isn't responding to requests to expand storage or isn't willing to invest the additional costs. Not sure it would make a difference but if you're quoting someone in a response and they've got photos then it's possibly a good idea to delete the photos from the quote to save space.
-
By SwissSeiko · Posted
Good Stuff! Try it again, this time having a bit of water on the file, that should minimize chipping. The only issue I could see with this method, is just how true the spindle runs. Even a few hundredths of a mm could cause issues once you install the jewel, causing it to not line up with the opposite jewel. Let me know how this ends up on the second attempt!
Recommended Posts