Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
Hello all!

When regulating and adjusting a watch we have to close the regulating pins as much as possible around the hairspring, leaving a minimal space between them and it when the balance is in the neutral position (neutral position being achieved only by taking out the anker/pallets).

 

My question:

After making all the settings on the regulator (for timing) and the end-stud (for beat error) why couldn't we close the regulating pins all the way around the hairspring? Why do we have to leave a small space on the left and right of the hairspring (if we add up these two spaces we have to get no more then the hairspring thickness or less then that).

 

 

Could anyone provide more details on the phenomenon behind this thing? Maybe even a mathematical/physical explanation?

 

 

Thank you!

Bogdan

Posted

Oh, come on! There has to be a mathematical model of the physical phenomenon! 

 

Even a scan will do, or the book title :)

 

 

Thank you!

Bogdan

Posted

Ideally the space between the hairspring and the regulating pins should be as much as another hairspring thicknes.

Less than that or more than that will lead to difference between horizontal and vertical positions rates which is bad as it leads to less accurate watch

br

emso

p.s: sent from my s****y phone so sorry for typing mistakes :-)

  • Like 1
Posted

Also i forgot to mention that the distance between the regulating pins should be the same at the whole length of the pins.

If not you wont have stable rate when the watch changes positions

br

emso

p.s: sent from my s****y phone so sorry for typing mistakes :-)

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)
:) Thank you for the explanation and the links. I had already read the first one.

I'm still curious about the physical explanation. Rolex doesn't have a regulator, they regulate the watch by modifying the inertia of the balance by modifying the screws on it. So why can't we close the regulator pins all the way? (after we set the correct position)

... And I think the answer is that there is no practical way of doing that because the hairspring will still slip through the pins...or, i don't know, gluing the hairspring to the regulator - this of course would mean not to move the regulator pins again...

I would like to post a link in which the phenomenon is explained a little, but I would like more then that :)


 

if the link doesn't work try searching on that site for "pinning to the stud & final adjustments"

Edited by matabog
Posted

I would recommend "practical watch adjusting" by de'carle and also "watches adjustment and repair" by Camm (quite rare but an excellent resource)

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Posted

Thank you for the suggestion Mark, I'm always looking for good books and although I have the first one, I didn't know about the second one. I was able to locate it here.

  • Like 1
  • Similar Content

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Agreed, this is puzzling. Can you ask questions or inspect the lots before bidding? My Boley & Leinen Reform face plate is dia. 95mm exactly. It's possible that 4 inches is a slightly too large approximation, but why then make the distinction to 3 11/16 for the sake of 8mm? If the larger ones are truly 4" then they will clash with the bed, but then I have no idea which 8mm lathe would take them. All 8mm lathes have spindle height 50mm or less, as far as I know. The spindle height is, as you say, standard 50mm for W.W.
    • I have only been a member for six years & I have found this a very friendly forum although I don’t have anything to do with watches not because I don’t like watches but because I have gout in both hands so my dexterity isn’t very good, I restore torsion clocks & occasionally other antique clocks also at 72 my eyes are not what they used to be, that is why I only post on the clock forum & the lathe forum mostly . As others have said Mark it is much appreciated that  you are willing & able to do this. very many Thanks Dell
    • Ah, this is brilliant, thank you very much!
    • A local machinery auction this week is liquidating some watchmaker's equipment. Actually a truly absurd amount of it, from a machine collector's estate, making me wish I had waited a couple of months to buy my lathe because there are so many options at low prices. Anyway - there are a handful of faceplates on 8mm collet mounts up for sale and I think I can probably get one. Having never had one in hand, they seem kind of large as described though - all are listed at either 4in (101mm) or 3 11/16in (93.7mm) diameter. As I understand it, WW lathes are 50mm from spindle center to bed so it seems like the 4 inch faceplates would not have enough clearance. Could I expect the 3 11/16in to fit with a WW headstock and bed? What is a typical diameter for a faceplate? Also possible the description of "4 inches" is only a rough estimate by the auction house and not actually accurate. Example the 3 11/16": I may have answered part of this - a lot of the listings on ebay from typical American lathe tool makers are specify about 3.75 inch diameters. Still I don't see any that specify 4 inches, but I am still guessing that is an overestimate by the auction broker.
    • Buying a specific jewel for a specific movement is difficult if not impossible in most cases. cousinsuk/jewels
×
×
  • Create New...