Jump to content

Dating an Ansonia Slate Clock


Tmuir

Recommended Posts

I recently picked up this rather sad looking Ansonia slate clock for a quite reasonable price. (The seller counted my offer with an offer $50 lower than I offered to pay)

Other than a missing pendulum it is complete.

I've not looked too closely so haven't decided if someone painted the slate to try and make it look better, or its just filthy, but by the weight of it its definitely slate

Are there any Ansonia experts that could date this or give the model name? I'm guessing 1880 to 1890, but that is just a guess.

The corners and top that look to be hand painted badly gold, would this of been originally painted gold, or gilded?

I do like the enamel dial and can see the potential under the grime, and yes it will need a number of bushes.

 

I do have the gong too, it had become unglued from the clock, so it is not sitting inside the movement

 

ansonia_slate1.jpg

ansonia_slate2.jpg

Edited by Tmuir
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The link I provided is what you needed. If you look at it again you will see the label of 1883 up to 1929 Ansonia where produced at Brooklyn, New York. Your movement is stamped Ansonia Clock co New York. One other thing if the glass is thick and original it will be from the early period. Thin glasses were fitted later. You also might find more info under the dial.  The hands are a style called  fleur-de-lis which is a French style which means Flower and are very popular with French clocks.

 

Clockboy you are correct these American clocks are not in the same class as French movements, there made of soft steel and poor grade brass. The reason these movements had lantern pinions was to take the wear and tear of the extremely powerful springs, the old springs are also made of poor metal. I don’t know if this is true I was told the reason the main plates are skeleton was to save on cost.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would agree definitely after 1883, although it would be nice to tie it in tighter than that.

I remember reading somewhere that these clocks were made to counter the french slate clocks coming into the US, Ansomia also made cast iron clocks painted to look like slate and cheaper wooden cased clocks painted to look like slate or marble too.

As oldhippy says not as good quality, or worth as much as the French slate clocks, but still interesting none the less

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Tmuir said:

I would agree definitely after 1883, although it would be nice to tie it in tighter than that.

I remember reading somewhere that these clocks were made to counter the french slate clocks coming into the US, Ansomia also made cast iron clocks painted to look like slate and cheaper wooden cased clocks painted to look like slate or marble too.

As oldhippy says not as good quality, or worth as much as the French slate clocks, but still interesting none the less

Yes you are right.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 years later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Dear WRT Community, My name is Ben, I am a watch enthusiast learning about watch servicing and repair thanks to Mark‘s course. I started a while ago and I am progressing at a very slow yet enjoyable pace. I look forward to exchanging with you on this forum! Ben
    • I wonder if they ever got the back off, dug mine out today for a change.
    • …here’s a factory shim on a supposedly high quality movement…as I said it’s a lovely shim, though…
    • Bending the balance bridge does seem to be an acceptable method as is taught in school and after all the Swiss make a nifty tool. But? Something was bothering me this discussion has gone on for five pages for one watch? One of the things we have to be very careful about when teaching watch repair on a discussion group is our observations of what's going on is based on the posting person making observations. The problem is if the person making observations does not actually grasp 100% what's going on will we become the idiots? so for instance bending the balance bridge why would we do that? Typically if it's been bent by somebody else and were restoring it back to wherever it's supposed to be. Or basically the Swiss are using it to fine tune the end shake. But it appears to be if I'm reading correctly we have a variation of 0.5 mm which is not a minor amount of end shake. this is where when you read five pages of discussion it becomes kind of a confusing mess so I would not recommend bending the balance bridge until we figure out exactly what's going on. So while I'm not a big fan of shimming which is extremely popular with @Nucejoe I do think it's perfectly acceptable until we actually figure out what's going on.
    • ? I don't know what you mean holds the arms ? The internal spring in the spindle should allow it to hold up to the rivet and the hub of the staff. But that means taking off both the collet and the rolle. With a figure of 8 calipers that have the correct nibs fitted you don't need to do that to true a balance wheel. 
×
×
  • Create New...