Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Interesting movement from the 70's - lots of plastic. Here is was in an Omega Speedmaster cal.1045 but I have seen it in Heuer, Tissot and Fortis watches. I have taken lots of pics. Enjoy :)

Tech Specs:

Frequency: 28,800
Lift Angle: 52º

 


Click here to view the article

Posted

Amazing movement (I love it) and great pictures Mark. Thank you for showing us. Lots of plastic parts indeed. Makes me think it was not designed to last forever -- as Omega claims -- in spite of the beauty and complexity.

  • Like 1
Posted

I am curious as to why they used plastic parts,  cost saving? hardly seems worth the effort,  less friction?  Longer life?   Omega watches usually cost an arm and a leg and your 1st. born child,  I would have been most upset had I bought one to find out it was a cheap and nasty plastic watch.

Posted

Great movement and pics. I was a design/development engr in late 60's/70's when engineering plastics (as opposed to moulding plastics ie toys!) were starting to become more available and cost effective.  We looked to replace metal parts to reduce costs or to simplify manufacturing processes.  Some of these were truly tough cookies and were tested at very high/low temps and all types of loading, but many of the good ones were difficult to machine.  They were often filled with nylon etc for greater strength.  Some performed superbly, others were useless!  No doubt omega were just being 'on trend'.

  • Like 1
Posted

Wow!  That looks like a beautiful, and delicate movement ... stuff scary dreams are made of *heh*

Thanks for sharing Mark

 

PS - Are those three pronged springs part of the cannon fiction system on this movement?

Posted

Wow!  That looks like a beautiful, and delicate movement ... stuff scary dreams are made of *heh*

Thanks for sharing Mark

 

PS - Are those three pronged springs part of the cannon fiction system on this movement?

 

It allows for flyback for the minute recording hand.

Posted

Oh. I see there are even plastic (let's call it engineering plastic or polymer or something :-( gears.

 

I actually have two of these (the watches have different straps and bezels though :-) Having a central minute counter rather than that little itty bitty counter on the ubiquitous Valjoux 7750 is nice. But I noticed recently that Fortis have switched from using the Lemania to the Valjoux...

 

I don't suppose any plastic parts needed replacing, where a metal one wouldn't have?

  • 6 months later...
Posted

Omega/lemania used plastics for several reasons. Being "on trend" is one, plastics were regarded as modern and high tech in those days. To reduce costs is another, the 70s digital wave weren't kind to our trusted "analog" manufacturers. Ruggedness is another, this were the only movement that stood up to several military tests. Several defence companies used only this movement because it had exceptional shock resistance, was resonable affordable and had a direct drive to the chronograph seconds hand. Most other chronos has an intermediate wheel in the seconds drive which cause it to stop on impact, but not this 5100/1045 obviously. So there's more than meets the eye with this movement.

I'm not a fan of plastics in watches generally but with this history, I think it has more than proven it's qualities, both in buissness and war... 

For more info on the 5100 follow this link..;

http://www.woundforlife.com/2014/10/10/hall-fame-lemania-5100/

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Alex mentions the coils below the stud should remain the same as you move the regulator block along the terminal curve.  Mine do that. What he doesn’t discuss and is used in the other video is how the regulator block is used to adjust rate and positional error.  He also doesn’t mention how opening and closing the pins could and in my case does, alter amplitude  In Alex’s video once he sets the stud he never adjusts the regulator pins yet every new movement I get have the pins signing closed. 
    • The video I linked above does mention the spacing of the hairspring coils, and the importance of the regulator being able to move through its full range without distorting the hairspring - the terminal curve of the hairspring must be concentric with the regulator pins throughout the regulator’s range.  If you meticulously follow every step in this video, the regulator system should behave as intended, regardless of the brand of the movement.  Best Regards, Mark
    • Hi friends! My mother got a bunch of old watches from a horologist who was retiring, and he subsequently passed away. It's been in her studio for years, and she showed it to me today and I just fell in love with it. Sadly, I don't know a darn thing about it yet. It's quite old, or at least seems to be. It has two winding arbors, but the key is missing. The crystal appears to be some kind of yellowed plastic, which is odd- I think it was replaced at some point to possibly protect it or something. If I had to guess, it's from the mid-19th century, given that it has no keyless works and that it says "Anchor Escapement" in French. It looks to be about 18 ligne, and the case fob is positioned in the upper right corner. The face is missing the dial, the hands, and a couple of the wheels that drive the hands- I think. But the movement itself seems to be in excellent shape. The serial number on the movement matches the number on the case- it's stamped on the movement and on the case in two places. I haven't started any disassembly yet, but I'm wondering if anyone can give me some idea of what kind of movement it is, and where I might look to see what parts are missing from the face. i may even have a dial that would fit it. It's in good enough shape that I think I could get it running, assuming I could find the missing parts. Any insights are vastly appreciated and thank you! Addendum: The inside of the case has some *very* tiny scratched numbers and letters in it, but I am having an extremely hard time seeing what they are. Like "N 99" and "No192X", They were clearly done with some kind of sharp stylus and maybe they mean when it was serviced or by who? Addendum the second: At least one of the scratches seems to say "N1921X" or maybe "W1921X". Serviced in 1921? And the inside lid of the case has the letters R H with a star between them, and a very tiny mark that says "ARGENT" in a u-shape.
    • I’ve watched every video I can find on YouTube. Some of the info is contradictory and none mention  the effect on amplitude or spring coil spacing which I observed. I was hoping someone here is a Seiko expert and knows these inside out.   
    • This video explains how to set up and adjust the etachron regulator :   I hope that helps, Mark
×
×
  • Create New...