Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Another strip down. Today it is a Poljot 31681 russian chronograph movement. This movement is strikingly similar to the Valjoux 7734.It was actually a nice movement to work on as it is a well built cam activated chrono. It has three sub-dials, one being for an off-centre seconds hand, another for hour recording and the other for a 30 minute recording hand.

The train is a 21,600

Enjoy some pics:



Click here to view the article

  • Like 1
Posted

Very similar to the 3133's that I have. I'm about to make one good one out of two because of major problems obtaining spare parts.

Posted

Not only the complexity, but the contrast of the finishing in the different surfaces! Looks like the finish is where it matters or is visible and also different quality to other movements (not better or worst but different), i.e swiss, japan, etc.

 

Thank you Mark, this is an unusual treat! Lots to see and learn.

  • 11 months later...
Posted

I never liked Russian watches, I always found them to be rough and ready. Seeing that spacer that goes under the balance cock still makes me laugh as to why couldn't they machine the watch without such a stupid piece. Nice pictures though.

Posted

i kinda like russian movts... they appeal to me because of their robustness and surprising accuracy. I only feel that these movements are let down badly by their cases... mostly snap-back base metal ... not many stainless steel ones!

 

Anilv

Posted

Very nice, looks very neat and complicated movement. Thank you Mark, as I'm not familiar with the Russian watch industry, I appreciate it more!

 

Cheers,

 

Bob

  • 4 weeks later...
Posted

Coincidentally, I'm wearing one of those watches at the moment. It's a Poljot chronograph that I've owned for years, and I quite like it. I agree with the comments above regarding the case quality. It's chrome-plated brass with a snap-on back, and is aging poorly. Likewise the crown - and it has lost the chrono reset stud, for which I need to find and install a replacement. Aside from that, I find it a pretty interesting and nice-looking watch.

Cheers,

Gryf

Posted

Hello, Geo! I have a smallish collection, and will post photos in the intro section as time permits. I've always been fascinated by mechanical devices, and very much enjoy tinkering and repairing. Owning an MG for twenty years has provided plenty of practice... But as far as watches go, I have four Russians and some other odds and ends, including a non-functional Seiko 6106-8489 that I would love to get working again. I bought it new in the 1970s, wore it for several years, then lent it to my brother. When he returned it to me, it was very dead. So joining this forum was partly in an effort to learn how to service and repair my own watches, along with a few old family clocks. I plan to retire in a few months, and am looking forward to having more free time to devote to my various hobbies, and watch repair is toward the top of the list.

Cheers,

Gryf

Posted

There are plenty like minded people here Gryf, if you need any help just ask. I look forward to reading about your horological exploits in the future. :)

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

I like the 3133 and 31681 (they're the same, except the 3133 doesn't have the 24h sub dial). And yes, they are extremely similar to a Valjoux 7734. The original tooling for the 3133 was bought by the USSR from Valjoux, so I wouldn't be surprised if some of the parts are still interchangeable. There are a few differences (and the date complication is completely different), but they are close enough that I used a 7734 service manual as a guide when I serviced one of my 3133s:

 

post-140-0-77962700-1444608148_thumb.jpg

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

Stefan -

 

That's the same model I have... a carbon copy, although yours is still pristine; mine is really showing its age. I have a new pair of chrono pushers on the way, and may replace the crown later. Also, when I had it serviced a while back, the watchmaker apparently lost the minute recorder hand and substituted a different one. Maybe I can find one of those, too.

 

Anyway, I really like it! It was my main watch for several years.

 

Gryf

 

0PLgBqW.jpg

Edited by Gryf
Posted (edited)

Yeah, I really like mine too. Unlike many of the more recently made 3133/31681-powered watches, this one is of a reasonable size (38mm diameter), and is shaped in such a way that it doesn't look thick on the wrist (it's very thin at the sides). I got really lucky with mine. It was cosmetically in great shape, but was running very poorly (extremely low amplitude, and losing 10 to 20 minutes per day), and I paid very little for it.

 

Regarding the minute recorder, you should be able to pick up a replacement as part of a set on eBay (search for "Poljot 3133 hands").

 

You could also try contacting Julian at Poljot24.de to see if he has any spare cases of that style.

Edited by svorkoetter
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Alex mentions the coils below the stud should remain the same as you move the regulator block along the terminal curve.  Mine do that. What he doesn’t discuss and is used in the other video is how the regulator block is used to adjust rate and positional error.  He also doesn’t mention how opening and closing the pins could and in my case does, alter amplitude  In Alex’s video once he sets the stud he never adjusts the regulator pins yet every new movement I get have the pins signing closed. 
    • The video I linked above does mention the spacing of the hairspring coils, and the importance of the regulator being able to move through its full range without distorting the hairspring - the terminal curve of the hairspring must be concentric with the regulator pins throughout the regulator’s range.  If you meticulously follow every step in this video, the regulator system should behave as intended, regardless of the brand of the movement.  Best Regards, Mark
    • Hi friends! My mother got a bunch of old watches from a horologist who was retiring, and he subsequently passed away. It's been in her studio for years, and she showed it to me today and I just fell in love with it. Sadly, I don't know a darn thing about it yet. It's quite old, or at least seems to be. It has two winding arbors, but the key is missing. The crystal appears to be some kind of yellowed plastic, which is odd- I think it was replaced at some point to possibly protect it or something. If I had to guess, it's from the mid-19th century, given that it has no keyless works and that it says "Anchor Escapement" in French. It looks to be about 18 ligne, and the case fob is positioned in the upper right corner. The face is missing the dial, the hands, and a couple of the wheels that drive the hands- I think. But the movement itself seems to be in excellent shape. The serial number on the movement matches the number on the case- it's stamped on the movement and on the case in two places. I haven't started any disassembly yet, but I'm wondering if anyone can give me some idea of what kind of movement it is, and where I might look to see what parts are missing from the face. i may even have a dial that would fit it. It's in good enough shape that I think I could get it running, assuming I could find the missing parts. Any insights are vastly appreciated and thank you! Addendum: The inside of the case has some *very* tiny scratched numbers and letters in it, but I am having an extremely hard time seeing what they are. Like "N 99" and "No192X", They were clearly done with some kind of sharp stylus and maybe they mean when it was serviced or by who? Addendum the second: At least one of the scratches seems to say "N1921X" or maybe "W1921X". Serviced in 1921? And the inside lid of the case has the letters R H with a star between them, and a very tiny mark that says "ARGENT" in a u-shape.
    • I’ve watched every video I can find on YouTube. Some of the info is contradictory and none mention  the effect on amplitude or spring coil spacing which I observed. I was hoping someone here is a Seiko expert and knows these inside out.   
    • This video explains how to set up and adjust the etachron regulator :   I hope that helps, Mark
×
×
  • Create New...