Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I have not one but two ETA 2783 based watches ... both of which need new stems.

These stems seem special in that they are helical i.e. the rectangular section at the end of the stem is twisted. Cousins lists them as 'Obsolete' and whilst I see some on ebay the price seems high for a stem (partly driven by the fact that none are UK based so postage is a factor).

So my first question is why a helical stem? This might well answer my second question which is ... could I 'get away' with a normal stem if I managed to find one that could fit? And, thirdly, does anyone know of a better (UK) source of 2783 stems?

Posted
36 minutes ago, WatchMaker said:

So my first question is why a helical stem? This might well answer my second question which is ... could I 'get away' with a normal stem if I managed to find one that could fit? 

The helical is needed to properly tension when quick-changing date. From our forum: 

Quote

  I have been so incredibly frustrated- these watches (I bought from hong kong) had wrong stems- (they had 2824 stems and I didn't realize there was a difference---there is), and these springs were not tensioned, so the date wheel would randomly move from one number to the next.  

https://www.watchrepairtalk.com/topic/5728-eta-278384-partsassembly-question/

Then you can go with Marc's excellent guide:

https://www.watchrepairtalk.com/topic/1924-eta-2783/

 

Posted
5 minutes ago, oldhippy said:

They are supposed to increase pressure of the sliding pinion against the winding pinion. You should be able to use the common type providing the sliding pinon is square.

No, you cant't. See above.

Posted

Thanks oldhippy ... I did come across http://www.windingstems.com/eta.php in a web search but the 2783 comes up with a 'Free Quote' icon rather than a buy price indicating it's not readily available. I didn't think they'd be so elusive!

Thanks jdm ... I had tried to do some due-diligence before posting my question and had come across the 'parts assembly question' you've kindly linked for me. As I read this though the OP had 2783 movements with 2824 stems. I'm not surprised there were then issues as windingstems gives them very different dimensions as per pic below.

I will of course always try and use the correct parts so my question was more a theoretical one for a plan B on whether there's merit sifting  through the hundreds of spare stems I have to try and find one that matches a broken 2783 example albeit without the helical twist.

stem_comparison.jpg

Posted

I found three stems but i could probably part with 2 if you can't find them elsewhere.

Probably have some more ETA 2763 stems somewhere if i search harder. 

  • Thanks 1
Posted
4 hours ago, WatchMaker said:

As I read this though the OP had 2783 movements with 2824 stems. I'm not surprised there were then issues as windingstems gives them very different dimensions as per pic below.

Thanks for posting the comparison. You are looking at the original 2824, but that OP probably had a 2824-2 stem, which has sizes
A=75
E=315
B=110
C=110
D=90
F=39

That is much closer to a 27xx stem, and may almost fit.

BTW, there is also an error for the 2824. Size E is supposed to be A+B+<dimension not specified>, but it reports A+B=160 with E=114.

 

  • Like 1
  • 3 years later...
Posted

Only if inside the clutch wheel is square. If the inside is twisted to take a twisted stem the answer is no. Call 2783 come in two types twisted and squared. You can't fit one into the other. 

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Did you watch the whole video? Once Alex has set the stud, he first corrects the best error, then checks that the hairspring coils are breathing concentrically, then turns the stud to centre the hairspring between the open regulator pins.  He then checks that the regulator can traverse the terminal curve without disturbing the hairspring. A correction is needed, which he performs.  He then reinstalls the balance and re-centres the hairspring between the regulator pins, and verifies that the regulator traverses the terminal curve without disturbing the hairspring.  Finally, he demonstrates how to close the gap between pins.  He then recaps the whole process, fleshing out more detail. If you follow this process, you have correctly set up the regulator pins, and are ready to set the rate of the watch.  If you are interested in learning more about the effects of the regulator pin spacing on positional rates etc, you can read any literature regarding regulator pins. The etachron system makes adjusting beat, centering the hairspring between the regulator pins and adjusting the gap between the pins very convenient, but the same rules that apply to old style regulator pins apply to the etachron system.  This video explains the basics :    I hope that helps, Mark
    • Some photos of the angles you are talking about, and the changes you are seeing to coil spacing etc. would be really useful. Part of your problem could be that you are closing the pins too far and pinching the hairspring. Adjusting the pin separation should not affect amplitude. Nor should it change the coil separation.
    • Did you try it on a Rolex ref. 16600 specifically? Congrats on the nice condition of the movement in your watch. Even so, remember to check the rotor play or those marks around the main plate may start to build up.
    • Here is a method described in the watch repair book of Mark W. Wiles. Don‘t hammer, just tap very gently!
    • Alex mentions the coils below the stud should remain the same as you move the regulator block along the terminal curve.  Mine do that. What he doesn’t discuss and is used in the other video is how the regulator block is used to adjust rate and positional error.  He also doesn’t mention how opening and closing the pins could and in my case does, alter amplitude  In Alex’s video once he sets the stud he never adjusts the regulator pins yet every new movement I get have the pins signing closed. 
×
×
  • Create New...