Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Hello guys,

An attempt to make a low cost hairspring vibrating tool :

Prove of concept :

_DSC1377-800x600.jpg.1eddcab2b354d6d31db88b3f945a0b26.jpg

The hairspring (here it's a 18s balance) is clamp in a crocodile clip which has been grinded to be as fine as possible, a laser beam is set so that the beam is cut by the balance arm. The photo diode (from an old pc mouse ) is en-capsuled in a little housing to avoid parasite light (from what i thing to be an old TO3 transistor spacer found in my spare screws box).

The IC is just a simple op amp acting as a comparator, the led on the output is used to visualize the that the laser beam is on the detector.

First measure on scope :

_DSC1378.thumb.JPG.c2d32ef0514065eecad581faf3f5d70e.JPG

Doing some simple math show that an error of 0.1 ms on the measured value (which is 400 ms for 18000 bph) correspond to an error of 21.5 seconds / day. At that time base setting my scope has a resolution of 4 ms !

I switched to an Arduino based measuring system :

_DSC1382-800x600.jpg.c5d129d4a76c8f4b75c81f9eb58c8829.jpg

I used an existing Arduino module based on a cheap stm32  and add a led (indispensable to adjust the beam) and the power output for the laser. The comparator is no more required as the stm32 has schmitt trigger inputs. The soft is triggered by the touch screen and accumulate a couple of measures in a circular buffer to compute an average value. This permits to eliminate aberrant measures that you can have when the balance starts to swing.

 Detail of the crocodile clip :

_DSC1386-800x600.jpg.a6a6d81a0950b7e4223aa36be9896f49.jpg

In conclusion this is little tool (cost me only the plexyglass sheet, around $1.5)  could be useful to match a new hairspring on an existing balance. The measures are relatively simple to do with a good consistency and surprisingly the croco clip do the job and you can get the balance swing for tens of second on the plexy. You need a resolution of 0.05 ms to be at 10 s/d and probably calibrate your measuring device. The main difficulty was to adjust the position of the laser beam.

Hope this can give you some ideas.

Regards

 

 

 

 

 

 

_DSC1383-800x600.jpg

  • Like 7
  • Thanks 2
Posted

I love the ingenuity behind this, especially the fact it is manufactured from relatively low cost components. Would I be right in thinking that the initial angular excitation is made by rapidly displacing the whole apparatus through a small angle, or have I missed a part of the rig?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Posted

Very nice! This has been on my low-priority to-do list as well, but I didn't get much further than thinking about how to do the actual balance frequency pickup. I play with stm32/stm8/arduino stuff as well.

I thought about building an old-school one, but they are just too impractical as they only work at a single bph.

Have you ever used the legacy version? I've never replaced a balance spring, only fixed them. Sadly enough, sometimes because I warped it myself in a clumsy moment. The smaller the hairspring, the easier it is to damage and the harder it is to fix.

Your alligator clip looks much too strong to safely hold the spring. I assume you've modified it?

 

Posted

If the clip fails to grip the hairspring and it drops onto the plexyglass you could end up with a broken balance staff. That clip looks as if it might bend the hairspring so it could be out of shape.

 

Nice try but I think you need to modify it. Why do you need such a device? Are you intending to make your own balance?

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

Hi syfre,

I like your prototypes and your spirit of research.

Who ever had to make a flat or a Breguet hairspring (happens now and then in my shop), knows why you need such a device.

Years ago I made my own device as I did not like the traditional boxes that can test one beat rate only and are ridiculous expensive, very similar to your setup:

spitalbox1.jpg.jpg.0f0a914dd75bb26b14b9e839acc8b945.jpg

 

Advantage: box has a built-in 3 V battery that lasts for years (or one month if running permanently).

Frank

spitalbox2.jpg

Edited by praezis
  • Like 4
Posted

Nice, I have thought about doing something similar as I have a couple of spare Raspberry Pis with displays and a couple of laser diodes lying around, but on the list of tools I still need to make a hairspring vibrator is pretty far down on the list.

For pure tool porn you can't beat the look of the old fashioned hairspring vibrators though.

  • Like 1
Posted
27 minutes ago, Tmuir said:

For pure tool porn you can't beat the look of the old fashioned hairspring vibrators though.

Agreed, like the one in the photo above.  I can see how details like the two rack and pinions would make it a pleasure to use, but things like that take a lot of time to make.

Posted
14 hours ago, teegee said:

Your alligator clip looks much too strong to safely hold the spring. I assume you've modified it?

Yes, the alligator clip has been modified , it works much better than i thought, but i tried pocket watch hairspring only. Also i used an old croco clip which was originally shaped differently than the chinese ones you can find on the bay.

 

 

14 hours ago, teegee said:

 

 

Posted
why vibrate  a spring?

Hi vinn. The objective is to measure and validate the dynamic frequency of the balance / hair spring as a system, therefore it needs to be set into motion first. There are some good videos of the traditional empirical method on the BHI website. The system is excited by pushing and releasing a lever then comparing angular displacement over a fixed time. It’s rather tedious looking, but the above apparatus is ingenious


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  • Like 2
Posted
Hi syfre,
I like your prototypes and your spirit of research.
Who ever had to make a flat or a Breguet hairspring (happens now and then in my shop), knows why you need such a device.
Years ago I made my own device as I did not like the traditional boxes that can test one beat rate only and are ridiculous expensive, very similar to your setup:
spitalbox1.jpg.jpg.0f0a914dd75bb26b14b9e839acc8b945.jpg
 
Advantage: box has a built-in 3 V battery that lasts for years (or one month if running permanently).
Frank
spitalbox2.jpg.77da3ddee2f3a0ca88f52f3ddece9384.jpg

Nice adaptation of the luthy-Hirt oscillator.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  • Like 1
  • 2 years later...
Posted

Hello

I am French, I am not an electronics engineer, but passionate about old watches.

I'm very interested in your two montages. Could you give me all the instructions to make this vibrator.

Kind regards

Posted

Praezis actually makes these for a very reasonable price- I'm glad you posted, I've been meaning to buy one and it slipped through the cracks, will order now!

 

If you send him a message he can send the info and user manual, it looks like a killer tool. Not only are the master balances rare to find (in odd beats especially), they are prone to damage and drifting in precision. I only do a hairspring every few months but I know this will pay for itself in zero time (pun intended).

Posted
On ‎2‎/‎12‎/‎2018 at 12:02 PM, Deggsie said:


Hi vinn. The objective is to measure and validate the dynamic frequency of the balance / hair spring as a system, therefore it needs to be set into motion first. There are some good videos of the traditional empirical method on the BHI website. The system is excited by pushing and releasing a lever then comparing angular displacement over a fixed time. It’s rather tedious looking, but the above apparatus is ingenious


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

   I should have known,   I thought it was a horse at Long  Acres.     vin

  • Haha 1
Posted

I've seen the Finnish tool firsthand and it is an excellently made piece of equipment. As I already have a regular Luthy tool, I'd rather go for Frank's optical platform that fits it with the software; the Luthy tools can be found for a few hundred bucks. I think the Finnish tool would be well suited for small boutique makers doing small series custom watches; the next step from there is the Greiner system which I think starts around 20k...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Here is a method described in the watch repair book of Mark W. Wiles. Don‘t hammer, just tap very gently!
    • Alex mentions the coils below the stud should remain the same as you move the regulator block along the terminal curve.  Mine do that. What he doesn’t discuss and is used in the other video is how the regulator block is used to adjust rate and positional error.  He also doesn’t mention how opening and closing the pins could and in my case does, alter amplitude  In Alex’s video once he sets the stud he never adjusts the regulator pins yet every new movement I get have the pins signing closed. 
    • The video I linked above does mention the spacing of the hairspring coils, and the importance of the regulator being able to move through its full range without distorting the hairspring - the terminal curve of the hairspring must be concentric with the regulator pins throughout the regulator’s range.  If you meticulously follow every step in this video, the regulator system should behave as intended, regardless of the brand of the movement.  Best Regards, Mark
    • Hi friends! My mother got a bunch of old watches from a horologist who was retiring, and he subsequently passed away. It's been in her studio for years, and she showed it to me today and I just fell in love with it. Sadly, I don't know a darn thing about it yet. It's quite old, or at least seems to be. It has two winding arbors, but the key is missing. The crystal appears to be some kind of yellowed plastic, which is odd- I think it was replaced at some point to possibly protect it or something. If I had to guess, it's from the mid-19th century, given that it has no keyless works and that it says "Anchor Escapement" in French. It looks to be about 18 ligne, and the case fob is positioned in the upper right corner. The face is missing the dial, the hands, and a couple of the wheels that drive the hands- I think. But the movement itself seems to be in excellent shape. The serial number on the movement matches the number on the case- it's stamped on the movement and on the case in two places. I haven't started any disassembly yet, but I'm wondering if anyone can give me some idea of what kind of movement it is, and where I might look to see what parts are missing from the face. i may even have a dial that would fit it. It's in good enough shape that I think I could get it running, assuming I could find the missing parts. Any insights are vastly appreciated and thank you! Addendum: The inside of the case has some *very* tiny scratched numbers and letters in it, but I am having an extremely hard time seeing what they are. Like "N 99" and "No192X", They were clearly done with some kind of sharp stylus and maybe they mean when it was serviced or by who? Addendum the second: At least one of the scratches seems to say "N1921X" or maybe "W1921X". Serviced in 1921? And the inside lid of the case has the letters R H with a star between them, and a very tiny mark that says "ARGENT" in a u-shape.
    • I’ve watched every video I can find on YouTube. Some of the info is contradictory and none mention  the effect on amplitude or spring coil spacing which I observed. I was hoping someone here is a Seiko expert and knows these inside out.   
×
×
  • Create New...