Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

Crap first thing in the morning.....................there's nothing quite like it.

The amazing thing is, there are five people bidding on the remains?

Edited by Geo
Posted

The mind boggles, what a piece of junk, the clever bit is selling it at £108.  When there are many good quality reasonably priced movements available one has to wonder why Swatch went to all the trouble of developing it, just to save a buck or two.  My Chinese Rolex look alike @ £14.95 from Ebay is a proper 21 Jewel? automatic and twice the watch the Swatch will ever be.

  • Like 1
Posted

Weird. I wonder why any of the rest of the watch uses metal, if the most important part is made of plastic.

 

Perhaps it's a joke? Maybe they're making fun of someone or something? If so, of whom or what? And why?

 

 

Of course, there might be a technical reason for it. Perhaps it's pure teflon (see wikipedia article) with its extremely low coefficient of friction?

Posted

Well, all it takes is some very bad corporate decisions to sink an industry. Let's hope Swatch is not pushing it too far with the prices, product quality and over all crappy politics for their products...I really like some of the brands under their umbrella.

Posted

Hate it, hate it, hate it, hate it, I feel like sending the guy a couple of quid to go towards the somewhat priceless info we've got after dismantling what can only be described as a proper piece of crap!. Have swatch really lost the plot with this.?....do watches really need to be made this way?. Totally understand the need to challenge new materials and techniques but this is so far off the mark it's a joke.

Posted

Perhaps it's revenge? After all, it wasn't the Japanese or the quartz or digital watches that virtually destroyed the Swiss (and others) watch industry. It was "us", the people that stopped buying Swiss watches.

Posted

I don't think they will be as successful as Seiko with mixing plastic and metal (ex. 7S26 et al). And then, Seiko knew where to push the plastic parts in the movement.

Posted

Are Swatch Group in trouble? This is very reminiscent of the dying days of the British motor & motorcycle industries - churning out desperate designs like the Austin Allegro & Ariel 3. What a piece of...

Posted

The most disturbing thing for me was the fact that it can't be serviced owing to its design - and the article started by showing defects in timing. It's a no-brainer!

Posted (edited)

The remnants of the watch sold for £20 on Fleabay, someone must have needed a strap!

Edited by Geo
  • Like 1
  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

Who is in charge of the Swatch Group at the moment?!  Because presently its an insane asylum being run by the inmates!

Firstly the Swatch Group announces they are no longer supplying spare parts to independent watchmakers, and now they're hyping a caliber with designed obsolesce.

 

Is this the future of Swiss watchmaking?  If it is, then they have no future.

Posted

ROFL!

Just posted what I think of this piece of rubbish on Swatches advert for it, on their Utube Channel, with a link to the very informative article Will posted here ... and guess what?

 

They pulled my comment within 2minutes of me posting it ... ha ha ha ha, typical!

Posted

Just taken a brief look at U toob and it appears that this watch does seem to be reasonably well received by a fair number of mugs err people, or have Smersh err Spectre err Swatch (thats right isnt it) deleted all the bad posts? Careful what you say or the new CEO may come round and make you uncomfortable.

 

post-80-0-13552400-1412791271.jpg

  • Like 2
Posted (edited)

No still around I'm affraid, changed his name to that of a well known British high street bank & currently residing with his clone on the island of Brechou in the Channel Islands. First order of business - take over the neighbouring island of Sark & then the world!

Edited by Blacklab

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Alex mentions the coils below the stud should remain the same as you move the regulator block along the terminal curve.  Mine do that. What he doesn’t discuss and is used in the other video is how the regulator block is used to adjust rate and positional error.  He also doesn’t mention how opening and closing the pins could and in my case does, alter amplitude  In Alex’s video once he sets the stud he never adjusts the regulator pins yet every new movement I get have the pins signing closed. 
    • The video I linked above does mention the spacing of the hairspring coils, and the importance of the regulator being able to move through its full range without distorting the hairspring - the terminal curve of the hairspring must be concentric with the regulator pins throughout the regulator’s range.  If you meticulously follow every step in this video, the regulator system should behave as intended, regardless of the brand of the movement.  Best Regards, Mark
    • Hi friends! My mother got a bunch of old watches from a horologist who was retiring, and he subsequently passed away. It's been in her studio for years, and she showed it to me today and I just fell in love with it. Sadly, I don't know a darn thing about it yet. It's quite old, or at least seems to be. It has two winding arbors, but the key is missing. The crystal appears to be some kind of yellowed plastic, which is odd- I think it was replaced at some point to possibly protect it or something. If I had to guess, it's from the mid-19th century, given that it has no keyless works and that it says "Anchor Escapement" in French. It looks to be about 18 ligne, and the case fob is positioned in the upper right corner. The face is missing the dial, the hands, and a couple of the wheels that drive the hands- I think. But the movement itself seems to be in excellent shape. The serial number on the movement matches the number on the case- it's stamped on the movement and on the case in two places. I haven't started any disassembly yet, but I'm wondering if anyone can give me some idea of what kind of movement it is, and where I might look to see what parts are missing from the face. i may even have a dial that would fit it. It's in good enough shape that I think I could get it running, assuming I could find the missing parts. Any insights are vastly appreciated and thank you! Addendum: The inside of the case has some *very* tiny scratched numbers and letters in it, but I am having an extremely hard time seeing what they are. Like "N 99" and "No192X", They were clearly done with some kind of sharp stylus and maybe they mean when it was serviced or by who? Addendum the second: At least one of the scratches seems to say "N1921X" or maybe "W1921X". Serviced in 1921? And the inside lid of the case has the letters R H with a star between them, and a very tiny mark that says "ARGENT" in a u-shape.
    • I’ve watched every video I can find on YouTube. Some of the info is contradictory and none mention  the effect on amplitude or spring coil spacing which I observed. I was hoping someone here is a Seiko expert and knows these inside out.   
    • This video explains how to set up and adjust the etachron regulator :   I hope that helps, Mark
×
×
  • Create New...