Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

You know the most disgusting part about that link? He pulls that plastic surround off last. The online tutorial has it coming off near the very start when there's lots of delicate parts still attached waiting to be crushed by a careless finger :).

 

Very helpful link!

Posted

The first thing I do is to remove the balance wheel and put it aside, then I feel safe to work on the rest! And yes, you are absolutely right, that ring is better removed when there is no delicate parts left on.

Posted

This was originally a post regarding what tools to buy and it has now turned into a post regarding the repair of a Seiko movement. Both are good posts, but would it be possible for Mark (the boss) to create a new post so that anyone searching topics could find the Seiko one easier? :-)

Posted (edited)

@Geo: ...and the pithwood holder, don't forget that! :)

 

@Padraic: I looked at your link, excellent and I intend to read it through! Very interesting! Thank you for posting it!

Edited by bobm12
Posted

@Geo: ...and the pithwood holder, don't forget that! :)

 

 

Got a link to this Pithwood holder mate?  To prime my tweezers, and screwdrivers, I use pith wood, but instead of cutting it the traditional way, I cut it length ways, and secure it to my bench with blutak. Here's a new one I fitted today..

 

15226007529_7a7757b0a1.jpgSANY5540 by Micky.!, on Flickr

 

And here's my bench again since I reorganised it. Tried one of those Chinese winders, the green one in the photo, the orange one is a Bergeon, silent it is, more than can be said about the cheap Chinese one, it will be replaced soon, but at $800 a pop, its a heavy investment, the differences in green and orange models is the speed, the orange model is the slower, final test winder whereas the green is slightly faster.

 

15379748786_beabc71607.jpgUntitled by Micky.!, on Flickr

Posted (edited)

Sniff! You didn't like my pith holder! (Wiping a tear) It's sooooo cuuuute! ---That was my small daughter when let down. (Now she is big and a black belt ...and no more sulking!   :)

 

In any case, I like the way you hold the pithwood SSteel. The blue tack is like a putty isn't it? I use buttons so it would be even better with the blue tack thing. Nice solution and now we all have it! Doesn't this Forum rocks?!

 

By the way, nice desk and nice mini review of the Chinese winder!

Edited by bobm12
Posted

No problem, you can see the grease stains on the green winder where I had to add extra grease to make it quieter, but its still too noisy for my liking hence the decision to stick with another Bergeon.

 

So you use a button to hold your pith wood?  Hows that work then?  Curious :)

 

Blue Tak is similar to Rodico, but is normally used in teenagers bedrooms for holding posters of their favourite bands on their walls lol

Posted (edited)

I see you're using the same stackable trays I am ;). I used up two of them for the Seiko disassembly. Very handy with the lid for storage.

 

@bobm12: A work in progress - I add to it whenever I'm in the mood. My mood being driven by whatever security issue is currently ticking me off in the PHP language which is why the cross-site scripting, SSL and entropy chapters are so comprehensive. I've spent a chunk of time over the years reaching out (also known as "screaming at" ;)) the PHP community and considering that the constant complaining has led to some internals changes (the SSL weaknesses are mostly fixed in PHP 5.6 just this year, and Composer now plays nice with SSL) that has been mostly a success. I have a lot less to complain about these days!

 

Enough with programming, it's tweezer time this evening. I have a Seiko to put back together.

 

P.S. I have blu-tac here :). Let's see how it works.

Edited by PadraicB
Posted

I believe it is good that you reach out since apparently you've been heard so all that hard work is not in vain. I myself am involved more and more with everchanging network security standards and appreciate the updates.

 

So, back to Seiko, keep up the good work and post a picture when you can!

 

@SSteel: No, I meant I use pithwood buttons they are like the sticks of pithwood but already cut "in slices". They are very stable and because they are cut, they present a natural surface for the blue tack idea. Here is a picture:

 

post-253-0-99417100-1417467082.jpg

 

 

Posted

Damn, but I REALLY admire the experienced watchmakers out there right now - I've been at this for a couple of hours! The assembly of my 7S26 appeared to be going really well. I got the barrel, reduction wheels, etc., all the way to being ready to turn the movement over and slip on the canon pinion with everything apparently working well and freely.

Then I decided to check over everything one more time...

It turns out that while screwing down the yoke spring, I didn't notice that the yoke had jumped up over it's corner alignment pin. The yoke tail was put back in place and it stayed at the time, but now it is sticking out making the problem obvious :(. Tomorrow, I disassemble the movement back to that point to rectify the problem. And so another lesson is learned :). I do hope I haven't messed up the spring and that it settles correctly. My mistake appears to have been checking everything from a top down view - and not checking it from the side where the problem would have been obvious. The devil is in the details...

There's a lot of details in two trays...

15399761696_657a7dd974_z.jpg

I have to say something else - rodico, pith and pegwood. Well worth getting at the very start. Digging stuff out of a tray and getting it to the work area is just begging for trouble with tweezers only - at least at my level of experience! Rodico is a real saver there.

Unable to capture a live shark, here's my DIY "pith holder" :P. An unused mouse charger stand that has found new purpose.

15236601110_242d5ebf3e_z.jpg

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

Just finished putting the Seiko back together :).

 

I had one lucky moment when I tried turning a short screw for the date wheel cover over in my tweezers and it pinged off. Luckily it hit a tray and was kicked back onto the work mat! Had to strip it back to correct the yoke positioning since it had slipped of its alignment pin. Double checked everything while assembling. Main pain was getting the balance back in - the balance cock kept slipping around in the tweezer grip and I was getting afraid it would fall out on me. It's back in its case now.

 

I get to do this all again tomorrow...

 

Anyhow, a batch of "vitcims" have finally reached me this morning ;). Actually my first set of projects - I got hold of a number of military style watches that need work. Group photo when I get a chance tomorrow.

Edited by PadraicB
  • Like 1
Posted

Wasn't that fun! And the pride of having it back on and ticking? Way to go Padraic and I like the pith holder, less hazardous than mine! :)

Posted

Beginners luck all the way ;). Probably a wee bit of thanks goes to Seiko too - everything was lining up under bridges very easily. Nobody will want me servicing their watch for three days, but speed will come, as it always does, with practice and experience.

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The watch is from 1990 and was serviced just once around 20 years ago. No idea if the mainspring barrel was ever opened or changed before now.
    • Interesting but I think we have a problem here? We probably need to split hairs on a definition problem. For instance take a real Rolex movement put it in a real Rolex case but not the one it came in take a real dial real hands and make up a watch that is 100% real and what exactly is this? If you send your Rolex in for servicing and anything's been changed at all from what it was when it left the factory Rolex will be unhappy and remove all offending components. This does become a problem of people changing things because they think it's their watch and they want to have a different dial Lord diamonds the bezel or whatever words Rolex sees all of this as evil and bad as far as a Intel Rolex only things the watch is legit if everything is exactly what it was when it left the factory and nothing's been changed including the stem everything asked me Rolex original or their very unhappy about its existence. Then you think about a fake watch what is its real purpose? Well its real purpose is to make money for somebody and fool the customer. So all the watch has to do is look pleasant on the outside and inside can be anything. Typically nobody's going to see inside. So typically anything that's not legit counterfeit movement etc. why would someone spend so much time and effort making it look just like a real Rolex when there's no need to? Unless of course you have one or two movements to impress somebody with this is what's inside your watch but even that is problematic Now we don't end up with I've interesting problem that troubles me where I work. The owner will offend a cage your watch by looking at it carefully with a microscope the timing machine etc. and he will point out all the things that he feels are not appropriate correct or whatever for your watch. But in my example above of mixing and matching legitimate Rolex parts he wouldn't necessarily be able to tell. The problem I have with this is it often times things like his claim to telling a counterfeit is look at the second hand the quality of the secondhand is not as nice as a legitimate one. But maybe somebody replaced a second hand on a real Rolex. Or the other day at work I don't know what it was in before but there was a really pretty movement transparent back and they decided it was fake because of? Now I didn't think it was fake I took one look was beautifully manufactured but they had a reason What bothers me with counterfeit Rolex is or anything counterfeit watch related it is reminding me of a witchhunt. The early days of witch hunting how can we tell a which Manon which? That makes me wonder how many super fakes are really fake at all it's basically somebody deciding it's a fake based upon inappropriate assumptions. Like the secondhand is been changed or the watch was worked on the screws are perfect or other things. Other minor problems with super fakes for instance I have a long story the not going to tell the short version is I found the website once where they claim to be counterfeiting Rolex watches. They even had a picture to prove their counterfeit watch the problem with pictures online how do we know it's really a counterfeit watch and not a real Rolex watch that you're telling us is counterfeit. Oh and they had testimonials from all kinds of people who bought their watches and were very happy with the service of course the problem with the watch is you don't know what's inside it unless you take the back off and just because somebody shows a picture online and says this is their super fake maybe it really isn't a super fake they be there just trying to say that. We end up with a interesting problem of manufacturing a watch. Does Rolex actually make every single part found in their watch? Then the year 2004's basically irrelevant. This is because initially Rolex buys stock in the company and they manufacture Rolex watches. I'm assuming over time Rolex will acquire more stock and only in 2004 do they get the whole company. But the company itself hasn't really changed other than the name on the front of the building. The real question is did they really make every single component found in the Rolex watch from the beginning of time until end of the time? A lot of the components found in a watch would be extremely specialized did they make their own jewels or their own mainsprings for instance? But that is looking at the article they employ a heck of a lot of people now I would guess now that Rolex probably does make everything in-house. Especially when they have nifty CNC equipment like for making screws were he could make a huge batch of one type it instantly switch to another type where before he needed specialized machines for one machine for one screw now manufacturing all kinds of stuff in-house becomes very simple. But still is possible that in the early days they might have outsourced something may be perhaps. But conceivably we do have minor changes in thing is due to how things have been made over time which can lead to confusions over whether this is legit or not when it may be as a change of manufacturing methods oh and regarding the screws found in your Rolex watch? In about mid-80s I went to a school reunion in Switzerland. One of things we could do was visit a factory and I picked Rolex because I wanted to see the mass production making of Rolex watches. Which is very disappointed I did not get the sea at all because didn't see them making Rolex watches in their Geneva headquarters even though the building is really fake? So what did we get to see well after sales service because after all were watchmakers we should see that. Did learn something interesting about Rolex screws if your watch was sent to Rolex the screws that come back are not the ones that went there. As they are using powered screwdrivers they don't want to risk breaking heads off and they will replace the screws of every single watch. The other one of interest was suppose there's a scratch and you can see the brass? No problem they have a solution that basically electoral plates without electricity so the scratch goes away. The research Department was quite boring and didn't look like anyone was ever there. Then it was too long ago to remember all the details other than I was disappointed I want to see manufacturing.   Yes the joys of artificial intelligence that is more like a trained monkey that's there to please you.
    • Hey everybody! I just registered to WRT. I found this forum searching for informations about ELMA watch cleaning machines (will get one ELMA tomorrow ✌️). I'm new in watch repair, collecting watch repair tools to fill up my work space 😎.   Greetings from Vienna Michael
    • Is it not covered in the manual under Profix Cap Jewels?
×
×
  • Create New...