Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I bought an antique pad printer of the bay yesterday. It was the only such device specific to watch dials for sale, so I made an offer and it was accepted. Hopefully, it will help me do what I want it to do, print my own dials.

I also found a company who makes laser engraved printing plates for pad printers that should work with this setup.

post-90-0-34439500-1411365031_thumb.jpeg

I know it looks pretty beat, but like most tools from this era, it should still have some life in her yet!

The dolly slides from one side to the other allowing the pad to pick up the paint from the etched plate and stamp the dial on the opposing side. The two surfaces are magnetic and are controlled by the 2 mechanical silver colored knobs. I'm thinking a 2 axis clamp on one surface and a rotary table on the other. This way I can fine-tune the position of the printing plate and watch dial. Sounds good in theory!

  • Like 1
Posted

Good morning Don.

I'm looking forward to seeing how you get on with your acquisition, I saw it on Fleabay a few weeks ago and couldn't work out how it operated. If I had thought of you at the time, I would have given you a shout back then. I wish you every success with it!

Posted

Like Geo I cannot visualise how it works,  but a handy find all the same,  you will be able to find out whether doing your own dials is viable or not.

 

I think I remember seeing a YouTube video showing how these work.

 

It looks really good fun - you are really raising the bar Don!

 

And to start with $1 bills should see you a return on investment  - clever stuff! :)

  • Like 1
Posted

What is astounding is the dollar bill comes out already aged! Way to go DJW!

 

I like a lot this new turn in your business: your own in house made dials!. Maybe even as a side service offered, dial refinishing/reprinting for other brands too?

Posted (edited)

I have found this video on YouTube which shows exactly what pad printing is and how a watch dial is done,  very clever stuff.

This is a great video! I've watched this one many times before. It gives you a good idea on the amount of work that goes into printing high quality dials.

Edited by DJW
Posted

 

It looks really good fun - you are really raising the bar Don!

 

 

I don't know about raising the bar, but I am raising my credit card balance! :thumbsu:

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

That video was nice. Anyone know what the pad is made of?

 

 

Don, which file format(s) do they accept for making the laser engraved plate?

Edited by colinh
Posted

That video was nice. Anyone know what the pad is made of?

 

 

Don, which file format(s) do they accept for making the laser engraved plate?

The pads are made of silicone. the Pads are shaped in such a way that they act in a rolling fashion when the lever is pulled, kind of like a printing press roller.

All they need is a any type of picture file, jpg, png, etc.

Posted

Oh, that's convenient.

 

I was planning to get a company which makes printed circuit boards to make a laser-cut stencil (which is normally used for squeegying on the solder paste, for those tiny surface mounted devices). But they require Gerber files (I think).

 

In the video, you see the guy filling the plate with paint, which is then transferred by the pad.

 

Is it possible to apply the paint directly to the dial, using the plate (stencil). Ie. by "filling" the plate (with the dial underneath), and then just removing the plate. Wouldn't that work, or would it work, just not as well?

Posted

Oh, that's convenient.

 

I was planning to get a company which makes printed circuit boards to make a laser-cut stencil (which is normally used for squeegying on the solder paste, for those tiny surface mounted devices). But they require Gerber files (I think).

 

In the video, you see the guy filling the plate with paint, which is then transferred by the pad.

 

Is it possible to apply the paint directly to the dial, using the plate (stencil). Ie. by "filling" the plate (with the dial underneath), and then just removing the plate. Wouldn't that work, or would it work, just not as well?

There are probably numerous ways to ad paint to a dial, but think of the reasoning behind this process. Even before automation, this was the easiest and cleanest way to print multiple dials in the shortest amount of time. Stenciling would probably work for a couple of dials before getting gummed up. But, them it would require a good cleaning before continuing. Also, pad printing creates very sharp lines. I believe Stencils can have bleeding, even when pressed tightly to the object being painted...

  • 7 months later...
Posted

Hi guys, years ago I worked at a CD manufacturing place that printed using both screen printers and the transfer printing you see in the process. It was a bit fancier with automated ink wells and squeegees, but same process. I recall the biggest challenge with the transfer process was the viscosity of the ink, the volatility of the solvents in the inks, the relative humidity of the air, and absolute cleanliness of everything. The smallest contaminant would wreck the ink wiper, nick the squeegee blade and you'd have a tiny stripe across your image. The magical part, though, was picking enough ink from the printing plate, transferring it on the silicone pad and while it was moving through air, flashing off some of the solvents, so that the ink would stick cleanly to the target surface - a watch dial face for example. Too wet and the ink wouldn't transfer. Too dry and the ink wouldn't transfer. Or it would string (think cotton candy spinning all those pesky threads). Anyway, getting the machine running and stable was an art, and then multiply that by a 3 or 4 color image....

The machine was called a "Tampo-matic", and the silicone pads were tampons. French, or Latin root, for 'pad' is the source of the word tampon. The guys and gal that ran that machine were whiz kids.

The screen printers were easier to use, more reliable, but the images were not near the quality of the pad transfer printer.

I'm sure ink technology has changed in the intervening 30 years, so I hope Don has an easier time than we did. It was a cool job, though.

Keep us in the loop, Don.

  • Like 1
  • 3 weeks later...
Posted

Don - I'm jealous. So jealous, in fact, that I think I'm going to get a dial printing machine...

 

However engraving the plates (clichés?) looks like a black art and frightems me - do you (or does anybody else) know of a UK based company that would be able to make them? 

 

Or if you're US-based, I guess they could post it...

 

M

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Alex mentions the coils below the stud should remain the same as you move the regulator block along the terminal curve.  Mine do that. What he doesn’t discuss and is used in the other video is how the regulator block is used to adjust rate and positional error.  He also doesn’t mention how opening and closing the pins could and in my case does, alter amplitude  In Alex’s video once he sets the stud he never adjusts the regulator pins yet every new movement I get have the pins signing closed. 
    • The video I linked above does mention the spacing of the hairspring coils, and the importance of the regulator being able to move through its full range without distorting the hairspring - the terminal curve of the hairspring must be concentric with the regulator pins throughout the regulator’s range.  If you meticulously follow every step in this video, the regulator system should behave as intended, regardless of the brand of the movement.  Best Regards, Mark
    • Hi friends! My mother got a bunch of old watches from a horologist who was retiring, and he subsequently passed away. It's been in her studio for years, and she showed it to me today and I just fell in love with it. Sadly, I don't know a darn thing about it yet. It's quite old, or at least seems to be. It has two winding arbors, but the key is missing. The crystal appears to be some kind of yellowed plastic, which is odd- I think it was replaced at some point to possibly protect it or something. If I had to guess, it's from the mid-19th century, given that it has no keyless works and that it says "Anchor Escapement" in French. It looks to be about 18 ligne, and the case fob is positioned in the upper right corner. The face is missing the dial, the hands, and a couple of the wheels that drive the hands- I think. But the movement itself seems to be in excellent shape. The serial number on the movement matches the number on the case- it's stamped on the movement and on the case in two places. I haven't started any disassembly yet, but I'm wondering if anyone can give me some idea of what kind of movement it is, and where I might look to see what parts are missing from the face. i may even have a dial that would fit it. It's in good enough shape that I think I could get it running, assuming I could find the missing parts. Any insights are vastly appreciated and thank you! Addendum: The inside of the case has some *very* tiny scratched numbers and letters in it, but I am having an extremely hard time seeing what they are. Like "N 99" and "No192X", They were clearly done with some kind of sharp stylus and maybe they mean when it was serviced or by who? Addendum the second: At least one of the scratches seems to say "N1921X" or maybe "W1921X". Serviced in 1921? And the inside lid of the case has the letters R H with a star between them, and a very tiny mark that says "ARGENT" in a u-shape.
    • I’ve watched every video I can find on YouTube. Some of the info is contradictory and none mention  the effect on amplitude or spring coil spacing which I observed. I was hoping someone here is a Seiko expert and knows these inside out.   
    • This video explains how to set up and adjust the etachron regulator :   I hope that helps, Mark
×
×
  • Create New...