Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Ok so I have a cheap Chinese hand pressing tool but I'm not happy with its build quality. It's fine for fitting hour and minute hands but there is play in the shaft which becomes worrying when fitting the seconds hand. As we all know how susceptible the seconds pinnions are to breaking. Also a lot of the vintage omegas are spring loaded or have a jewelled bridge at the rear. Is there anything available for supporting the jewel whist pressing the seconds hand on with a precision tool. I've been using a minute wheel attached to the base of the hands pressing tool to support the jewel and praying while pressing the hand on... Any thoughts or tried and trusted methods please

Posted

I actually use a staking set to install hands.

 

For the hour and minute hands I use a hollow flat stake, choosing a hole size that just fits over the minute hand arbor for the hour hand, and one that just fits over the seconds hand arbor for the minute hand, and pushing down gently by hand (no hammers). That way the stake comes up against a positive stop when the hand is in place and the tendency to push the hand too far down the post is eliminated. As a result there is almost always sufficient clearance between the hour hand and the dial, and between the hour and minute hands, the hands always go on square, and the only time any adjustment is necessary  is if a hand is bent out of its correct shape.

For the seconds hand my staking set has a stake with a plain, flat, brass tip and a plastic ball on the top (so designed for pushing by hand rather than hitting with a hammer).

 

As far as supporting the other end of the seconds hand arbor, this has never been an issue for me. As a rule, if you have to apply a lot of force to get the hand on to the post then its probably the wrong size hand. It should really only require light pressure to get it to seat, but nowhere near enough to damage the supporting bridge or jewel. If the movement has an indirect driven centre seconds hand with a tension spring bearing on the end of the arbor then this should flex enough to allow the shoulder of the arbor to contact the jewel or bridge for support without any harm coming to the spring.

 

The exception to this is chronograph centre seconds hands. When you reset the chrono the seconds hand rotates back to zero very fast and comes to a sudden stop. Because of the length of the hand and the speed of rotation, inertia is likely to cause the hand to slip around the post when the post stops at zero so unless the hand is a tight fit, it would be constantly going out of alignment.

For this reason  you should always use the correct movement holder which will have the proper support for the lower bearing built in to it.

 

Basically, use the right movement holder for chronos, and a light touch for everything else.

  • Like 2
Posted

This is a very good question Chris.  I'm looking into the same thing.

Using the standard Horotec hand fitting tools is fine for basic movement; but as I move on to more and more expensive movements (some these days over a thousand dollars), I'm not happy using the standard tools for fitting the hands.

 

I was considering this tool from Horotec, and any input from the seasoned veterans would be most appreciated...

 

post-246-0-88875700-1411643529_thumb.jpg

Posted

Thanks for the detailed reply Marc. I've just bought a staking set with a red nose on the top and a brass pin at the base. Will give it a try. As for the chronos it's not always viable to purchase a movement holder for every repair job. Think I will invest in a 7750/1164 as its a very popular one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Alex mentions the coils below the stud should remain the same as you move the regulator block along the terminal curve.  Mine do that. What he doesn’t discuss and is used in the other video is how the regulator block is used to adjust rate and positional error.  He also doesn’t mention how opening and closing the pins could and in my case does, alter amplitude  In Alex’s video once he sets the stud he never adjusts the regulator pins yet every new movement I get have the pins signing closed. 
    • The video I linked above does mention the spacing of the hairspring coils, and the importance of the regulator being able to move through its full range without distorting the hairspring - the terminal curve of the hairspring must be concentric with the regulator pins throughout the regulator’s range.  If you meticulously follow every step in this video, the regulator system should behave as intended, regardless of the brand of the movement.  Best Regards, Mark
    • Hi friends! My mother got a bunch of old watches from a horologist who was retiring, and he subsequently passed away. It's been in her studio for years, and she showed it to me today and I just fell in love with it. Sadly, I don't know a darn thing about it yet. It's quite old, or at least seems to be. It has two winding arbors, but the key is missing. The crystal appears to be some kind of yellowed plastic, which is odd- I think it was replaced at some point to possibly protect it or something. If I had to guess, it's from the mid-19th century, given that it has no keyless works and that it says "Anchor Escapement" in French. It looks to be about 18 ligne, and the case fob is positioned in the upper right corner. The face is missing the dial, the hands, and a couple of the wheels that drive the hands- I think. But the movement itself seems to be in excellent shape. The serial number on the movement matches the number on the case- it's stamped on the movement and on the case in two places. I haven't started any disassembly yet, but I'm wondering if anyone can give me some idea of what kind of movement it is, and where I might look to see what parts are missing from the face. i may even have a dial that would fit it. It's in good enough shape that I think I could get it running, assuming I could find the missing parts. Any insights are vastly appreciated and thank you! Addendum: The inside of the case has some *very* tiny scratched numbers and letters in it, but I am having an extremely hard time seeing what they are. Like "N 99" and "No192X", They were clearly done with some kind of sharp stylus and maybe they mean when it was serviced or by who? Addendum the second: At least one of the scratches seems to say "N1921X" or maybe "W1921X". Serviced in 1921? And the inside lid of the case has the letters R H with a star between them, and a very tiny mark that says "ARGENT" in a u-shape.
    • I’ve watched every video I can find on YouTube. Some of the info is contradictory and none mention  the effect on amplitude or spring coil spacing which I observed. I was hoping someone here is a Seiko expert and knows these inside out.   
    • This video explains how to set up and adjust the etachron regulator :   I hope that helps, Mark
×
×
  • Create New...