Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

I was recently given a Ladies Seiko 4207 automatic watch to service.

This will be the first time I've serviced a ladies automatic watch.

The watch was given to me not running but no information as to why it had stopped running.

On removing the back cover it became obvious there was a problem.

Look at the photo below, see the dark circle on the barrel with the red arrow pointing at it.

4207_1.png.6434fd9699f0bb240d7b6f53c5137999.png

That is an actual wear mark into the cover on the barrel, so obviously something is rubbing on it. I couldn't see anything obvious as to what was rubbing so I started to strip it down.

On removing the day wheel I was surprised to see cross head screws holding on the day jumper, and went and grabbed my new Horotec crosshead screw drivers I had just recently purchased. Imagine my surprise when I discovered the smallest one at 1.2mm was too big.

After some digging on Cousins I have found the AF make a 'Seiko' cross head screwdriver for the 9S26 which is 0.98mm, so I've added that to my next order. Hopefully it is small enough.

Sorry about the quality of photos but my camera recently broke and will no longer focus. I now need to move my camera closer or further away from what I am photographing to get it to focus.

Doesn't matter how many tools you have, you always need another one.............

4207_2.png.7b0e59a1ae287861cc833499a6758f81.png

Edited by Tmuir
Posted

Those screws are present on many Seiko movements. I just screw/unscrew mine with the smallest flat screwdriver that I have which is 0,8 or so. It's still a bit big but if you improvise a bit you can do it.

Is that circle mark really a worn out part or just dried out gunk/debris/lubricant ?

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Alex mentions the coils below the stud should remain the same as you move the regulator block along the terminal curve.  Mine do that. What he doesn’t discuss and is used in the other video is how the regulator block is used to adjust rate and positional error.  He also doesn’t mention how opening and closing the pins could and in my case does, alter amplitude  In Alex’s video once he sets the stud he never adjusts the regulator pins yet every new movement I get have the pins signing closed. 
    • The video I linked above does mention the spacing of the hairspring coils, and the importance of the regulator being able to move through its full range without distorting the hairspring - the terminal curve of the hairspring must be concentric with the regulator pins throughout the regulator’s range.  If you meticulously follow every step in this video, the regulator system should behave as intended, regardless of the brand of the movement.  Best Regards, Mark
    • Hi friends! My mother got a bunch of old watches from a horologist who was retiring, and he subsequently passed away. It's been in her studio for years, and she showed it to me today and I just fell in love with it. Sadly, I don't know a darn thing about it yet. It's quite old, or at least seems to be. It has two winding arbors, but the key is missing. The crystal appears to be some kind of yellowed plastic, which is odd- I think it was replaced at some point to possibly protect it or something. If I had to guess, it's from the mid-19th century, given that it has no keyless works and that it says "Anchor Escapement" in French. It looks to be about 18 ligne, and the case fob is positioned in the upper right corner. The face is missing the dial, the hands, and a couple of the wheels that drive the hands- I think. But the movement itself seems to be in excellent shape. The serial number on the movement matches the number on the case- it's stamped on the movement and on the case in two places. I haven't started any disassembly yet, but I'm wondering if anyone can give me some idea of what kind of movement it is, and where I might look to see what parts are missing from the face. i may even have a dial that would fit it. It's in good enough shape that I think I could get it running, assuming I could find the missing parts. Any insights are vastly appreciated and thank you! Addendum: The inside of the case has some *very* tiny scratched numbers and letters in it, but I am having an extremely hard time seeing what they are. Like "N 99" and "No192X", They were clearly done with some kind of sharp stylus and maybe they mean when it was serviced or by who? Addendum the second: At least one of the scratches seems to say "N1921X" or maybe "W1921X". Serviced in 1921? And the inside lid of the case has the letters R H with a star between them, and a very tiny mark that says "ARGENT" in a u-shape.
    • I’ve watched every video I can find on YouTube. Some of the info is contradictory and none mention  the effect on amplitude or spring coil spacing which I observed. I was hoping someone here is a Seiko expert and knows these inside out.   
    • This video explains how to set up and adjust the etachron regulator :   I hope that helps, Mark
×
×
  • Create New...