Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Greetings!

I was having an issue with a quartz citizen and decided to bypass the issue by replacing the movement.

The hands engage from the crown just fine, the watch pulses on the tester, but the hands won't move.

What could be wrong?

Posted

Could be that is defective from factory as it can happen with mass produced products, get a replacement or refund.

Posted
37 minutes ago, jdm said:

Could be that is defective from factory as it can happen with mass produced products, get a replacement or refund.

It could be.

I'm a little curious though, because the movement that came out of it was doing the same thing. Could something happen in the installation process to cause this to occur?

Posted
22 minutes ago, Apex86 said:

I'm a little curious though, because the movement that came out of it was doing the same thing. Could something happen in the installation process to cause this to occur?

Quartz mov.t often fails in a mysterious way. You can't see or really diagnose a faulty circuit board, although you can diagnose an interrupted coil. And then you find the part is not available or replaceable. Fortunately Miyota/Citizen are very cheap to replace entirely.

Posted
10 hours ago, Apex86 said:

I'm not sure, I have a generic watch tester (https://www.esslinger.com/watch-battery-and-watch-tester-with-pulse-tester/). Would that allow me to do it?

No, you need a low current multimeter to do that. But it wouldn't help, after you find that it draws the right current, or doesn't, there is still nothing you can do about it. You could have better luck with a line free device, which emits an impulse to free up movn't stuck by dried oil.

Posted
1 hour ago, jdm said:

it wouldn't help, after you find that it draws the right current, or doesn't, there is still nothing you can do about it.

It absolutely can help, because it lets you identify if the train is too heavily loaded which may lead you to identify a fault (hands rubbing being a common example). It also can help to identify if the coil is open-circuit, as the current draw remains lower than expected when running. Looks like the tester has a basic coil test function.

To help free the train if you suspect it is jammed, you can advance one of the wheels at the rotor end of the train gently with an oiler.

I would try un-casing the movement, remove the dial, and just install a seconds hand (if fitted) to check for operation. Also make sure the battery terminal is good and that the insulators are present where they are meant to be.

Posted
1 hour ago, rodabod said:

It absolutely can help, because it lets you identify if the train is too heavily loaded which may lead you to identify a fault (hands rubbing being a common example). It also can help to identify if the coil is open-circuit, as the current draw remains lower than expected when running. Looks like the tester has a basic coil test function.

All nice and good things when working on more complex, mov.t which are are difficult to replace, or for which parts are available, etc. But a Miyota/Citizen like the OP has cost typically $5 or less. The tester linked doesn't do anything that an household multimeter can't do, but cost twice as much.

Posted
45 minutes ago, jdm said:

All nice and good things when working on more complex, mov.t which are are difficult to replace, or for which parts are available, etc. But a Miyota/Citizen like the OP has cost typically $5 or less. The tester linked doesn't do anything that an household multimeter can't do, but cost twice as much.

Well, the hands do move freely when operating the crown. I'm not sure if that tells us anything.

I don't have an issue with replacing the movement. I am trying to understand what is happening because the previous movement was doing the same thing and I'm trying to see if anything I did caused this to happen.

If the movement became magnetized, would this be the outcome?

Posted
13 minutes ago, Apex86 said:

If the movement became magnetized, would this be the outcome?

No. Quartz mov.t have a lot of magnetism in them already, from the rotor.
And when they fail, or are bad from factory, they won't run. A quite common occurrence in fact.

Posted
2 hours ago, jdm said:

All nice and good things when working on more complex, mov.t which are are difficult to replace, or for which parts are available, etc. But a Miyota/Citizen like the OP has cost typically $5 or less. The tester linked doesn't do anything that an household multimeter can't do, but cost twice as much.

Yes, but your comment was in reply to my suggestion that current draw is a very important measurement. You can't reliably service a quartz watch without one. Otherwise Witschi wouldn't sell any of their testers. It's almost analagous to measuring balance amplitude.

Agree about the point regarding replacing the entire movement, but it may not be the movement itself at fault.

Posted
13 minutes ago, rodabod said:

Yes, but your comment was in reply to my suggestion that current draw is a very important measurement. You can't reliably service a quartz watch without one. Otherwise Witschi wouldn't sell any of their testers. It's almost analagous to measuring balance amplitude.

I agree with that. I had been looking for a multimeter capable of measuring µA using low voltage, and the cheapest I could find was about EUR 100. Buying Witschi is out of question for an hobbyist.

Posted

There is some simpler method for current measurement using a multimeter which I can't remember just now. May just involve running a large value resistance in series with the circuit and then measuring the voltage drop across it to determine the current flow. Would rely on the circuit having a very high input impedance though.

Posted
4 minutes ago, rodabod said:

There is some simpler method for current measurement using a multimeter which I can't remember just now. May just involve running a large value resistance in series with the circuit and then measuring the voltage drop across it to determine the current flow. Would rely on the circuit having a very high input impedance though.

Correct. But making the fixture to connect to the mov.t leads, plus fitting a resistor, and then do the corrective calculation really exceeds the effort one normally wants to spend on something like that. 

Posted

I'm not sure how much effort it would be for someone who's familiar with soldering. I have access to a Witschi, but if I didn't then I might make a jig. It's what the BHI suggest doing.

Possibly going slightly off topic, but my original point is that measuring current draw is important for serious quartz servicing work. The OP may not consider theirs to be serious work of course.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Decided to update with the repaired watch back in rotation and the new anniversary gift.   
    • I’ve been playing with a NH35 movement that which has the classic Etachron regulation system and a few balance assemblies as practice. What I’m trying to do is get comfortable with the effect both the stud and regulator pin positions have on rate and positional error. When I install a new balance assembly I install it with the assembly in place  on the cock and cock is attached to base plate. I use the back of the tweezers to push the stud into place and feel the click. However, I noticed that the angle of the stud can be adjusted and what I also noticed is that some movements have the stud carrier arm bent down a little and that changes the angle of the hairspring leaving the stud. This angle effects how the spring goes through the regulator pins and also the spacing of the coils opposite the stud. What I thought I was supposed to do is set the regulator block in the middle of the curve, open the pins, and use the stud angle to center the spring.  Then the stud is set.  Now on all the new NH movements I have seen the angle of the regulator block is about 60 degrees counter clockwise from full open. I watched a video where the author used the regulator pin adjust to adjust rate and position error. When I close down the pins I do notice that the rate increases but also the amplitude drops, the coil spacing changes and hairspring appears slight straighter between the stud and the regulator block. If I open the pins the amplitude comes back, the spring breathes a bit more between the stud and the regulator block and the rate slows.  So, a long post I know but I would really appreciate any advice on how to correctly adjust the etachron system for rate, amplitude and positional error.   
    • Aw come on Andy, it was just a comparison between spending 30 quid and tackling a tricky piece of work. You appeared to be volunteering,  i volunteer for stuff all the time it gets me into all kinds of trouble.
    • It's not really shown here , but the blade flips over, so it faces the other way. The knob and threaded case holder then pushes the caseback seam into the blade. Once the blade starts to penetrate into it, the lever and blade are lifted , which should hopefully pop the back off. A lot of fashion style cases have very tight seams and need a sharp blade to start separating them.  Don't buy the cheaper plastic versions of this tool, the posts with the pins through for blade holder break easily if the apply extra force to blade. 
    • You will still be looking for a balance complete I’m afraid, this is the balance staff, balance wheel and hairspring in one package. Hairspring and the balance wheel are matched in the factory. Whilst we can change a balance staff the hairspring and balance wheel stay together.   Tom
×
×
  • Create New...