Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

With all the talk of Long Arm Microscopes to add in watch repairing, I too have been looking into optical solutions to use.

I find after many hours using a standard loupe my dominant eye gets a little strained ... not to mention having lack of depth perception whilst working.

 

I was at my Dentist the other day, and she was using a pair of Carl Zeiss Stereo Optics to aid her, and I asked if I could have a look through them .... WOW OH WOW!! 

Simply stunning vision!!  So clear, and with a huge "exit pupil" things were nice and bright to boot.  The only issue was the focus length ... as they were set for dental work @ 500mm (19.68inches).  But I definitely wanted to know more!!

 

So I called Zeiss in Australia, and explained my needs.  They were incredibly helpful and supportive to my inquires ... it's truly a shock to receive old style customer service these days, but that's what I got from Zeiss.  So much so that they sent a rep to my house with a demo pair for me to loan for a week or two: like I said old style customer service at it's BEST!

 

Here they are ... the Carl Zeiss EyeMag Pro F.

 

post-246-0-97033600-1412334374_thumb.jpg

 

post-246-0-07526100-1412334380_thumb.jpg

 

post-246-0-50735100-1412334377_thumb.jpg

 

These ones are 4x power, with a focal length (FL) of 300mm (11.81 inches), which is not from the end of lens, but from your forehead ... so you can take the length of the lens out of the equation.  These are a little bit too far away from the work I think; and I mentioned this to their rep.  He suggested to keep them for a week, and if he found a set with a close FL he would contact me.

 

Not 2 hours later he called and said they had a pair of 5x with an FL of 235mm (9.25 inches).  That sounds about perfect to me.  They will be shipping them out to me, free of charge, to test for a few weeks.   Just amazing service!!

 

So I'll keep you all updated on the outcome.

  • Like 2
Posted

Yeah, they're not cheap ... but cheap gear isn't good, and good gear isn't cheap.

 

Remember, these are fully Titanium construction, with lifetime warranty.  The rep was telling me that some spinal surgeons have been using similar optics from Zeiss for over 30+ years, and they are still covered under warranty.

 

This, to me, is an investment in my eyesight (comfortable, fog free, stereo vision, with high quality German Lens), and product I will be enjoying for decades after I've forgotten about the initial cost.  As long as the "5x @ 235mm (9.25inches)" lens work well, I'll be putting the money down on them.

Posted (edited)

Those are powerful reasons Lawson. If you put it that way I guess I would do the same in your place! As for me, at this time, I will wait a little and of course since you have the opportunity to test it for free, I will await impatiently for your review of the item. This will be in my wish list for now...well at the top....pending wife approval! :(

 

PS. Maybe if Zeiss knows about this forum they might consider a discount for forum members! :)

Edited by bobm12
Posted
bobm12, on 04 Oct 2014 - 2:23 PM, said:

I will await impatiently for your review of the item. This will be in my wish list for now...well at the top....pending wife approval! :(

 

It will be a very unbiased review Bob.  I've already told the rep that the current ones I have are not "fit for task" because they are a bit long in the focal length @ 300mm (11.81 inches).  I should be getting the pair set @ 235mm (9.25inches) to test, next week.  I will be testing them on an ST96, ETA 2540, and a pocket watch before I'm satisfied they will do the job.  So they will be put through the paces.

 

At this point I am impressed by firstly by the customer service of Zeiss: with the lengths they have gone to, and their willingness to help a single individual with an unusual request, and the quality and finish of the product.  The ONLY thing that's stopping me from buying them is the focal length of the optics, but this is paramount to my purchase, and has to be spot on.

Posted

I know you'll be fair Lawson, it goes without saying! By the way, will you be able to try it with a lady's movement like the Seiko 4205? It would be interesting...and more/new service pictures/review!!! :)

  • 3 weeks later...
Posted

The testing is done, the verdict is in.

I have run the Zeiss - Eye Mag Pro F 5x @ 235mm (9.25inches) through their paces on many watches, including several Analog Quartz movements with very small gear trains.

So what do I think? ....

 

 

These are the BEST optics for working on watches bar none! I will never, and I mean NEVER, go back to using a standard monocular eye loupes again; except on inspections that require the extreme magnification of a 20x to 30x loupe ... which is rare.  The clarity is so good that I don't even have to swap to a higher power loupe to locate the tiniest of pivots, even the tiny rotors in Quartz analog movements ... this set does it all.  I have shown them to several professional watchmakers, who have been in the trade for decades (some as much as 50yrs), and they are astounded by the Eye Mag Pro's clarity and comfort, and are looking into getting themselves a pair.

 

Believe me when I say there is nothing like working with stereo vision that moves with your head movements, and gives complete depth perception at all times.  If you can afford to buy them, DO IT!  And if you can't afford to buy them .... SAVE! :)

  • Like 2
Posted

Thanks for the the report Lawson, it's good to know they are the business for doing watch repair. Did you find the weight to be an issue if they were worn for long periods of time?

Posted

Did you find the weight to be an issue if they were worn for long periods of time?

 

Hey Geo,

 

Not at all my friend. 

They are completely Titanium, including the frames. 

And if you have a look at the nose piece of the frames they are very well padded in soft rubbery plastic.

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

Just received my optics from Zeiss, delivered directly to my work :)

 

IMPORTANT NOTE: The magnification/optical length ratio is no longer a stock item at Zeiss (note they are black instead of the new silver look) ; BUT they still have old stock of the 5x @ 235mm which they are heavily discounting at the moment to clear the NOS!  I saved AU$1340.00, nearly a 50% discount!! ... so if you want a pair ORDER THEM NOW!

 

Here's my invoice:

post-246-0-99788700-1414798323_thumb.jpg

 

Here's the stock number of the optic to get the ones that are discounted:

post-246-0-44378000-1414798321_thumb.jpg

 

They come in a very sturdy case that will keep them well protected

post-246-0-67820200-1414798315_thumb.jpg

 

Picture of the inside of the case with my new Eye Mag Pro F optics

post-246-0-87903000-1414798318_thumb.jpg

 

 

Posted

Here is my cheapo solution: 6x magnification 370mm working disatance - $275 plus shipping.

Flip Up Prismatic Loupes 6.0X Titanium Frames.  Ref. Nº F-T-6.0X

From CareOptical (China)
http://www.optical-world.com/optical-loupes-flip-up-prismatic-loupes_c8

The optics are excellent but I would have liked a shorter WD.

 

post-374-0-83393000-1414848628_thumb.jpg

I am buying these more comfortable eye glasses to replace the supplied Ti frames.
UVEX I-VO 9160-120 Safety Glasses / Spectacles - Clear Lens + Head Band

 

post-374-0-32019100-1414848647.jpg

 

  • Like 1
  • 4 years later...
Posted
On 11/1/2014 at 2:32 PM, cdjswiss said:

Here is my cheapo solution: 6x magnification 370mm working disatance - $275 plus shipping.

1

Happy with your solution? I'm (more than) tempted to give it a try. Working distance is specified to 340mm. Did you measure 370 mm or just a typo? Thanks!

Posted

Seems to me that the long focal length would allow you to do watch work when sitting at a regular bench/desk rather than a raised up watchmaker-style bench.

Do you find that's true?

 

  • Like 1
Posted

Got in touch with a representative for Carl Zeiss in Sweden to ask for the current price of Lawson's setup. Approx. USD $2000 excluding tax :startle:

Hmm... think I will go with the Chinese "cheapo solution" when/if I want to try this out.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Thank you @Mark. I only became a Patreon subscriber 5 or 6 months ago, but I draw so much value here. If you come up with future contribution or support opportunities, I will be on board.
    • Hi Mike I did a ships clock a long while ago, not a Hermle though and without getting the beast in my hands to refresh my memory I can’t recall the timing.  This doesn’t help I know but will start the grey matter turning.
    • Of course it will continue Richard.
    • I have stripped and cleaned a Hermle ships clock. It was just oily, no major faults, and I reassembled it, following my photos in reverse order. The time train is fine but the strike train will not play the ships bell strike for half-past. Ships bells play a four hour sequence for the 'watches' and play double 'ding' for the hour and the double dings plus one for the half past (eg half past the second hour is 'ding-ding' 'ding-ding' 'ding'). Sounds complicated but it isn't really. The strike wheel consists of pairs of bumps (for the ding-ding) and no single bumps. There must me some mechanism on the half-past that lifts the strike lever over one of the bumps so only one ding is played. When I get to a half past, it still plays double ding. I have a feeling it is to do with the lever in front of the rack (there is a sprung attachment  on it) and the position of the wheel (to the right) with the two pins that lets that lever fall, but no matter where I place that wheel I cannot get a single ding at half past! Please can someone help with advice on positioning so I can fix this? BTW Happy Easter 🐣 
    • No it's not 52. I had looked at the Pocket Watch lift angles thread, which lists Elgin 6s as something really high like 62° but visually that is not at all what this watch is doing. I think 42° is more correct and that's where my machine is setup. The watch has a million problems but I have made solid progress. Impulse jewel replaced. Hairspring didn't match the balance (which also doesn't match the serial) but I got it down into range this weekend with 8 or 10 huge timing washers. Replaced the mainspring, balance and train are nice and free. At this point it is running consistently and in beat at about 160°, the third wheel has a bend that sends the timegrapher on a little roller coaster every 8 minutes or so. Remaining amplitude problems may be down to the escapement. The banking pins were way out and it didn't run at all before I started. It has one of the old brass escape wheels rather than steel, and I assume the faces its teeth are probably worn or scored in a way I can't yet fix (or see without a microscope). I know this watch is not going to run above 250° but I am going to keep trying to get above 200. But the best part about this watch? Some unscrupulous person stamped "21 JEWELS" on the train bridge sometime in the past, right on top of the Damascening. It's a 15 jewel movement.
×
×
  • Create New...