Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

First I would like to give my many thanks to Mark Lovick for sharing with us all the wonderful world of watch repairing. His talents at the bench are a great source of inspiration and motivation. I have learned great tips on technique. Books are good, but being at the bench with a professional such as Mark is a true joy. His care and dedication shows us all what can be accomplished through patience, determination, and the willingness to learn. Mark, your videos are unmatched anywhere, they are truly a gift. Thanks again.

 

      And now on to my main topic. Whilst servicing an ETA 2824-2, I received the new mainspring. Upon examining the inner coil that has the slot for the hook on the arbor, it became obvious this last and important coil was incorrectly formed and way too large to fit the corresponding diameter of the mainspring arbor. The photos show it clearly. I have a question for Mark. Is it somewhat common? Is it just a matter of forming this coil to fit? I have not come across this before. I think that the mainspring should not have to be altered, as this may cause a stress point. I am tempted to return it for another. The mainspring is shown with the corresponding arbor to compare.

post-351-0-83338600-1412544276_thumb.jpg

post-351-0-37095300-1412544320_thumb.jpg

post-351-0-91868600-1412544349_thumb.jpg

Posted

Welcome to the forum Charlie, you should like it here.

I've had the same issue but not with that movement. I resolved it by gently re-shaping the spring with a pair of round nosed pliers.

As I'm not a professional watchmaker, I too would like to here Marks take on the problem, and if it crops up often.

Posted

Thanks Geo, I'm liking it already. If I chose to reshape this spring, I might do it after installing it in the drum. At least that way the spring can only come out one end. I would also like Marks take on this, I hope he responds, if not, I might send him a p.m.

Posted

If I chose to reshape this spring, I might do it after installing it in the drum. At least that way the spring can only come out one end.

That's the way I did it!

Posted

Hi and welcome to the forum.

 

Whoever supplied that - it's unacceptable in my opinion. I would complain. The proper 2824 mainsprings will have a hook that fits the barrel arbor.

 

The Swiss GR reference for the mainspring is: GR3149X

But you can buy genuine ETA and the reference at Cousins is ETA28201801.

 

However if you do want to close it - you have quite a gap there, I have reduced them before but obviously the larger the gap the greater the risk of snapping the spring. I would say it's 50/50 - it could go either way. 

 

Good luck - and let us know how you get on :)

  • Like 2
Posted

Well thank-you Mark for the kind reply and info. I will now be returning it, it came from Jules Borel, a reputable materials house I have been dealing with for years. I don't understand what you mean by the spring having a hook? This one has a slot like most I've seen.

Posted

I mean the rounded part that wraps around the barrel arbor. It has a hole near the end which hooks onto the arbor. If its way too big then it cannot possibly be designed for the 2824 as the 2824 has a very small diameter arbor.

 

The ones I have ordered in the past have had the correct size hook. I usually purchase by the GR reference.

 

Hope this helps :)

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

Exchange is definitely the way to go, I hadn't noticed that was an option. When I was supplied an incorrect spring for a Longine from a well known supplier, they weren't interested in a exchange because I had opened the sealed sachet and presumed you had the same problem.

Edited by Geo
Posted

Yes, they don't have problem with the package being opened because it's their fault for sending the wrong part. I returned it yesterday, but now have to wait two weeks for them to receive the right spring from Switzerland.

  • 2 months later...
Posted

Well, I have waited two months now and no spring. I ordered one from Cousins and it arrived in roughly one week. The installation did not go well with the first one so I ordered another. This was my first automatic servicing and I found the mainspring a bit trickier to install than a hand wound mainspring. All is well now and my Fathers Gylcine is running to +2 seconds a day.

Posted

Thanks. I'm beginning to like the automatics more and more since becoming more familiar with them at the bench. The ETA service sheets are worth their weight in gold!

Posted

www.******.com for parts.

 

I've been very satisfied with the communication, and pricing.  Shipping was only $2 USD

Who is this aimed at?

Posted

No one in particular. I posted as an alternate parts website.

I didn't know a procedure was in place for suggesting vendor sites.

My apologies if I violated the forum rules.

  • Similar Content

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I have stripped and cleaned a Hermle ships clock. It was just oily, no major faults, and I reassembled it, following my photos in reverse order. The time train is fine but the strike train will not play the ships bell strike for half-past. Ships bells play a four hour sequence for the 'watches' and play double 'ding' for the hour and the double dings plus one for the half past (eg half past the second hour is 'ding-ding' 'ding-ding' 'ding'). Sounds complicated but it isn't really. The strike wheel consists of pairs of bumps (for the ding-ding) and no single bumps. There must me some mechanism on the half-past that lifts the strike lever over one of the bumps so only one ding is played. When I get to a half past, it still plays double ding. I have a feeling it is to do with the lever in front of the rack (there is a sprung attachment  on it) and the position of the wheel (to the right) with the two pins that lets that lever fall, but no matter where I place that wheel I cannot get a single ding at half past! Please can someone help with advice on positioning so I can fix this? BTW Happy Easter 🐣 
    • No it's not 52. I had looked at the Pocket Watch lift angles thread, which lists Elgin 6s as something really high like 62° but visually that is not at all what this watch is doing. I think 42° is more correct and that's where my machine is setup. The watch has a million problems but I have made solid progress. Impulse jewel replaced. Hairspring didn't match the balance (which also doesn't match the serial) but I got it down into range this weekend with 8 or 10 huge timing washers. Replaced the mainspring, balance and train are nice and free. At this point it is running consistently and in beat at about 160°, the third wheel has a bend that sends the timegrapher on a little roller coaster every 8 minutes or so. Remaining amplitude problems may be down to the escapement. The banking pins were way out and it didn't run at all before I started. It has one of the old brass escape wheels rather than steel, and I assume the faces its teeth are probably worn or scored in a way I can't yet fix (or see without a microscope). I know this watch is not going to run above 250° but I am going to keep trying to get above 200. But the best part about this watch? Some unscrupulous person stamped "21 JEWELS" on the train bridge sometime in the past, right on top of the Damascening. It's a 15 jewel movement.
    • I think it would rather be the blast of high current drain that would do the damage. But if used occasionally to maybe fix a mainspring or do dial feet it might be worth trying especially if the mainspring or a replacement couldn’t be found.    Tom
    • This is indeed a unique site and members including myself genuinely care about it.  All we want is the site to continue. 
    • Hello Mark,  thank you for the ad removal , like JohnR725 , I appreciate any revenue from such would be helpful.  This is the one forum which encourages conversation and social interaction and in that sense it is unique  All the others I frequent can be a little intimidating and answers some what terse some quite rude. I think on here we try to do justice to your site in keeping with your principals. In my opinion it is like no other. The contributors  behave and act like gentlemen and ladies. And long may it continue to be so.
×
×
  • Create New...